Reviews

I found this book hard to review, as it's difficult to disentangle issues I had with the plotting, such as forays into Byronic opera, with issues I had with the character of the protagenist. Both left an unpleasant taste in my mouth but it is unfair to penalise the author for deliberately cultivating such a skin-curling feeling.

There is a lot of good in this book. It's engaging, it's short, it has a depth to it worth plumbing. I found the twists of the storyline highly-interesting, and there was never a point where I felt like putting it down.

However, I struggled with how much I disliked the main character. It saddens me that men like this exist, but I guess they do: men who frame their desires as heroic rights and their actions as unpreventable excercises of those rights.

Spoiler

The beginning of the book was a struggle for me in that regard, but it perked up towards the middle and end, as David recevied the ramificaitons of his disgrace.

Overall, 3.5 stars.

devis1227's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

meganmclean's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

ioutm's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This is soul shaking, most depressing book that I have ever read. The whole book is reaching out to that ultimate point of depression where nothing is left for one to find redemption, and all that is left is ‘to let go’. The book is so depressingly realistic that you find yourself wishing like a child that a fairy god mother or a comic super hero make an appearance out of nowhere and set things right – despite knowing that no such thing was ever going to happen. You end up looking for any remote point of redemption – when David finally seeks apology you want to have him forgiven; or when David sets dog on Pollux, you feel the satisfaction that could be derived from revenge; or you want Lousy to shift away from place or David to take the dog as pet.

I admit that I wasn't impressed by the book at first but it is with the incidence at Lousy’s house that book picked up for me. The writing style seemed a bit boring except for poetical extracts quoted here and there. It was from the incidence of burglary that I felt involved into it.

David is this man entering old age but still trying to maintain the passions of young. His instincts are one of a poet, and within poetry he finds reason enough for the little scandal that comes in starting of story. He doesn't feel sorry for it even at cost of losing his job but is rather defensive, accepting charges but refuses to apologize for his actions. He finds it immoral to kill one’s instincts quoting, again as is his habit a poet:

“'Do you remember Blake?' he says. 'Sooner murder an infant in its cradle than nurse unacted desires'?”

He uses somewhat same poetical sense of reason which Santino Ariza used to explain similar actions in Gabriel’s “Love in Time of Cholera”. However all this is bound to change after the incidence at farm. That is where disgrace steps in. Later he puts his thoughts in Byron’s mouth,

“Out of the poets I learned to love … but life, I found is another story.”

The above quote pretty much sums David’s part of story. My problem though is with Lousy. Why won’t she report rape (and it being a private matter is poor excuse especially with the pregnancy)? Why is she so defeatist? I understand her reservations for adaption. Why wouldn't she move out? For what is she willing to suffer so much? May be she got fond of her little house and life and is (like David once was), trying to hold on to it, yet I find her decisions revolting. The author keeps looking inside the mind of David but it is the inside of Lousy’s mind that interests me and she stays a riddle, an unanswered question.

I know I’m supposed to talk about sub themes – love for animal, attitudes towards sex, how ones’ writings reflect change in opinions; but these details are all giving tone to same depressive question – the question of meaning of life.

More...