Take a photo of a barcode or cover
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Content Warnings
Moderate: Misogyny, Racial slurs, Sexism
adventurous
challenging
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Medical content, Murder
Moderate: Racial slurs
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death, Blood
Minor: Body horror, Racial slurs, Forced institutionalization
adventurous
dark
funny
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death, Misogyny, Sexism, Violence, Blood, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Racial slurs
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
N/A
This was a great, BUT LOOONG, read! I did really enjoy most of the book, even though I skipped a certain zoo scene, you can too, it's not that important.
It is a very old book, so the treatment of its female characters were... interesting. Definetly don't expect some Mulan type of badass female characters, because those poor women weren't allowed to do so, but expect to love them none the less!
It's definetly not a very scary story, but a fun one to read, and I can definetly recommend for others who want to read the classics like me <3
OKAY, MINA AND VAN HELSING WERE THE BEST CHARACTERS OF THIS BOOK! I loved them so much! Mina and her clever brain and her trains, and Van Helsing and his serious "vampire stuff is happening" face", I loved them a lot. The main men and their "oh no, you soft tiny woman thing, we most protect you from the TERROR of KNOWING THINGS oh nOOO" attitude towards Mina AND Lucy was extremely annoying at times, but I guess it was understandable.
Morris was cleeeaaarlyyy written by a man who has never met an American in his life, but the human manifestation of Texas was a fun character, and I was so sad when he died :(
One thing I'm not sure about are the Romani, the romanians, and the hebrew character... I AM WHITE, SO I HAVE NO WORD IN SAYING IF THEY'RE APPROPRIATE OR NOT, but I got some feelings, so definetly check up on that before reading, just in case <3
It is a very old book, so the treatment of its female characters were... interesting. Definetly don't expect some Mulan type of badass female characters, because those poor women weren't allowed to do so, but expect to love them none the less!
It's definetly not a very scary story, but a fun one to read, and I can definetly recommend for others who want to read the classics like me <3
Morris was cleeeaaarlyyy written by a man who has never met an American in his life, but the human manifestation of Texas was a fun character, and I was so sad when he died :(
One thing I'm not sure about are the Romani, the romanians, and the hebrew character... I AM WHITE, SO I HAVE NO WORD IN SAYING IF THEY'RE APPROPRIATE OR NOT, but I got some feelings, so definetly check up on that before reading, just in case <3
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Blood
Moderate: Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Religious bigotry
Minor: Animal death, Racial slurs, Cultural appropriation
adventurous
dark
hopeful
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
If Dracula had ended after chapter four, I might have given it a full five stars. The first fifty-odd pages are undoubtedly the best part of the book. Jonathan Harker is trapped in Dracula’s castle, and slowly realising that he is trapped. The atmosphere is tense and eerie. Both Harker and Dracula are interesting and well-developed characters, and the interactions between them are great.
I want to talk for a moment about Count Dracula specifically. In the first four chapters he is depicted as (seemingly) kind, hospitable, careful, and emotionally intelligent, but there’s something sinister about him too. There’s also quite a bit of queer subtext. Dracula is a complicated and sympathetic character at this point, but later his characterisation changes drastically and he ends up being reduced to a cartoonish villain with very little depth. He also becomes a much less prominent part of the narrative – he’s not entirely absent, but he takes on more of a peripheral role. I wish we’d seen more of him. (Interestingly, this is the exact reverse of my view regarding Frankenstein’s monster)
Of course, I must address the elephant in the room – the bigotry. Dracula is a character crafted from several antisemitic tropes. His hooked nose is emphasised many times, and there are parallels between his vampirism (specifically his preying on children) and blood libel. Something else that stands out when viewing the character through this lens is the way he is presented as both an immensely powerful mastermind and a weakling with a “child-brain” – proto-fascist rhetoric, perhaps? The book as a whole is riddled with xenophobia, racism, ableism, and sexism. In many ways it’s a product of its time. Its age doesn’t excuse these problematic elements, but it does offer some context at least.
I was led to believe that Dracula is slow-paced but for a gothic horror story it’s actually very quick. It’s relatively well-written, and the epistolary format is executed well. Excellent build-up to an anticlimactic ending. There’s so much more I could say about the characters and the story (both praise and criticism) but I think I’ll wrap things up here.
Overall I did enjoy Dracula and I’m glad I finally sat down and read it. It’s certainly not without its flaws but I think it’s worth reading if you haven’t already.
“The last I saw of Count Dracula was his kissing his hand to me, with a red light of triumph in his eyes, and with a smile that Judas in hell might be proud of.”
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Confinement, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Antisemitism, Medical content, Murder
Moderate: Ableism, Animal death, Child death, Drug use, Racial slurs, Suicidal thoughts, Xenophobia, Kidnapping, Grief, Stalking, Death of parent, Alcohol
Minor: Body horror, Self harm, Slavery, Suicide, Vomit
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I didn't actually know the story of Dracula before reading the book, so I went in about as uninformed as one could go into Dracula (I had read The Route of Ice and Salt by Jose Luis Zarate, translated by David Bowles first though.) I also had forgotten it is an epistolary, which was a pretty awesome surprise.
Overall, Dracula is an amazing book, and it's no surprise the book has withstood the test of time. I was warned that maybe it would feel tropey, because it established so many tropes, but it didn't feel tropey to me at all. In fact, I was surprised to see that Dracula is not always the stereotypical vampire we might think he is.
I expected this book to be more of a product of its time, and while in some senses it is, it's very forward thinking, including giving a woman an important--vital, even--role (there aren't a lot of women, but the main cast is fairly small). Though compliments to women are things like "She has a man's brain...", you will find ample use of the term "g*psy" (which is to be expected for the time), and there is some racism--it's up for debate if those are Stoker's feelings or the characters at times. But even at its worst, I didn't find it appalling, just out-of-date. (Granted, their treatment of a patient at the asylum is pretty bad at times.)
From the get go, I was enthralled in this book. While it is slow, there is a lot of excitement and the climax really felt exciting and quick when push came to shove.
My biggest gripe would be that Dr. Van Helsing's dialogue and writing can be tough to read since his English isn't super strong, as well as some other accents, which Stoker insists on writing out as it would be said. The accents and dialects can be tough to read, but they're all interesting characters.
I recommend picking up either a Penguin version or another annotated version to help clear up some things less evident to modern and American readers. Plus there are all sorts of really interesting studies on the book as well as Bram Stoker.
Overall, I definitely recommend it. While it is slow-paced, the story clips along well all the same. In my opinion, a perfect balance for a slow-paced read.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Gore, Mental illness, Blood, Medical content, Stalking
Minor: Animal death, Confinement, Death, Racial slurs, Antisemitism, Death of parent
adventurous
dark
emotional
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death, Mental illness, Racial slurs, Sexism, Blood, Medical content, Grief
Minor: Animal death, Child abuse, Child death, Gun violence, Racism, Sexual assault, Suicidal thoughts, Terminal illness, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism
-Moderate Racial slurs: the word "g*psy" is used multiple times throughout the novel
-Moderate Sexism: There is no sexism encountered by the characters in the universe of the story, but the narration and word choices of the author are dated and express antiquated opinions on gender roles and gendered expectations throughout the novel