magicalghoul's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional hopeful inspiring reflective sad

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amarnareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring reflective sad tense slow-paced

5.0

This was a very difficult read, I had to stop almost at every chapter to process the emotions it awakened in me.

This is a book about an horrific event, but in every paragraph one can feel the love, hope and kindness of each of the survivors.

Do I recommend it? Absolutely. But bear in mind that this is a heavy book both for the heart and mind.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

wildbluebells's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful reflective sad

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dana_naylor's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional inspiring reflective sad tense medium-paced

4.5

Not a good book for someone without prior knowledge of the 72 Andes story.
The book has alternating chapters telling the story chronologically and interviews/discussions/memories from the 16 survivors, so without a prior framework, it can be difficult to follow.

I’d recommend Miracle in the Andes or Alive as good initial books.

This is an excellent addition. I especially appreciate knowing the author’s connection to the boys on the flight.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

camz's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional hopeful informative inspiring reflective sad medium-paced

5.0

No recomendado si no has visto un documental/película o leído un libro sobre el accidente pues no está narrado cronológicamente.

Un mismo suceso puede ser narrado 5 veces desde distintas perspectivas y otro solo puede ser mencionado 1 vez o tan pronto comienzan a hablar de como fue la supervivencia en la primera semana pueden saltar a hablar sobre su rescate y puede ser muy confuso. 

Al fin de cuenta el libro parte de la suposición que si estas leyendo, ya sabes qué paso y se enfoca en cómo se sintieron mientras sucedía. 


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nesilla's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jhbandcats's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring reflective sad tense medium-paced

5.0

I saw the movie Society of the Snow and started reading the book as soon as I got home. Both are vivid, compelling, horrific. After I started reading, I decided to reread Piers Paul Read’s Alive. I remembered it being different from Society of the Snow (SOTS) despite it being the same story. 

Alive is a rather judgmental nonfiction narrative told in the third person. SOTS is indeed quite different, more philosophical and sympathetic. Alive was written within a year of the accident; SOTS was written 35 years later when people have spent half a lifetime reflecting on what happened. It alternates chapters of a third-person narrative with chapters written by each of the sixteen survivors. 

It’s a beautiful way to tell such a terrifying tale, giving the survivors their chance to say - some for the first time - what happened. Each, of course, has a different perspective, some describing a full, emotional life since the recovery, others closed off from their lives to protect themselves from their memories and experiences. 

It’s a story of life amidst a snow field of death, of determination and love and solidarity in the face of a bitterly cold hell. It’s unforgettable. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...