1.59k reviews for:

Transcription

Kate Atkinson

3.46 AVERAGE


Kate Atkinson is a great story-teller, and this was a good story. Again it’s about British fascists, this time during WWII. I don’t know how there are so many of these books out, I guess it’s because it’s some D-Day anniversary this year. The main character is part of an MI5 operation keeping tabs on the fifth-columnists in Britain. These were British who were sympathetic to Hitler and the government was worried they would try to pass info to the Germans. It’s a little story as to how these operations were run and the complicated people who are involved in spying. The twist at the end is a bit weird, I don’t know why the author felt the need to add it. Maybe to just show that people who choose to go into the secret service do so for a variety of complicated reasons.
adventurous medium-paced

Smart, self-deprecating and so witty...I imagine Phoebe Waller-Bridge would play Juliet in the movie! A very well-structured story...not the usual "spy" novel. Looking forward to reading more of her work.

I gave up around page 200. This moved so slowly and Juliet was so distant.
tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Not my favourite Kate Atkinson story but still full of the qualities that make her books so good.  She sees the absurdities of how people think and behave.  The element of historical fact works really well

Absorbing story of MI5 agents during the early stages of World War Two and 10 years later in 1950, told through the eyes of Juliet who is employed to transcribe spied-on meetings by fifth columnists. Evoking the period well, it reflects the humdrum day-to-day experiences, cock-ups and other incidents of being a wartime spy and the legacy of paranoia and intrigue that lasted for decades to come.

My first Kate Atkinson. Easy to read secret service novel set in London in 1941 and 1950. Read Michael Oondatje Warlight straight before and felt it had more heft.

Entertaining enough as a novel, with some nice echoes of the era.

Nope. I feel like I have been bludgeoned by all kinds of the nonsense. The ending is like a soap opera where you find out that the star is married to the brother she never knew existed.

Really a 3.5 stars for me. An enjoyable and fast read but that won’t ultimately stick with me, and some somewhat unearned and yet enjoyable twists. A great vacation read.

Hmm. ..good in places.
How do you follow Life After Life?
God in Ruins.
Ok, so how do you follow God In Ruins?
You don't obviously.
Felt like we'd met this arch Shakespeare loving protagonist before, and that Atkinson wasn't really that into this. She should have written a Jackson Brodie pallet cleanser instead.
She has? Hurrah!