Scan barcode
lia_dabookfiend's review against another edition
- Loveable characters? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Rape
Minor: Incest
enaraccoon's review
medium-paced
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Too many men. Give me more women. And not from men's POVs.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny
Moderate: Rape and Sexism
flooooo's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Sexual content, Rape, and Death
cosm0's review
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Violence and Racism
Minor: Rape
quinn_07's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
funny
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence, Misogyny, and Blood
Moderate: Rape and Sexual content
Minor: Incest
md33's review against another edition
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism and Misogyny
Moderate: Sexual assault, Rape, Classism, and Incest
gmadz's review
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
A great intro the the Witcher series. Geralt on paper is such a charming and complex character to read about. The introspection provided in this book really sets the stage for how his flaws might affect him over time.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Rape
morgiechristine's review against another edition
adventurous
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Pedophilia and Sexism
Minor: Rape
mnstarr's review
adventurous
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape, Death, Sexual violence, and Violence
onthesamepage's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
If you're looking to pick this up after watching the adaptation, this book just about covers the first half of the first season.
Caveat: I first got to know The Witcher through the games (I played all 3, and loved them), and then I watched the first 2 seasons of the adaptation. This means I went into this book with expectations and an element of fondness/nostalgia, which definitely impacted my reading experience in a positive way.
I'm still only giving this 3.5 stars.
The thing is, I don't think this series aged particularly well. It falls under that brand of fantasy written by men, where they feel free to create a universe where women are consistently abused because "that's how things used to be in the past". Never mind that this is a fantasy world. The stories are full of misogyny. Even capable women don't escape it. Instead of focusing on their strength or prowess on the battlefield, characters like Calanthe predominantly seem to be valued for her "hand and bed". Yennefer, one of the strongest sorceresses, gets the "let's show some nudity in a random fight scene just 'cause" treatment.
Looking past that, the world building remains extremely vague, and I question how much I would've understood about the tension between elves and humans without the knowledge I already had about the setting. I don't think most things are explained very well.
You do, eventually, get a sense of who Geralt is as a character, although even that I found disappointing, since the book seems to portray him as someone who has no issue killing humans to prove to some lord that he should be hired, or as someone who would potentially "mount a striga", as a priestess suggests. He didn't do the latter, but he definitely did the former, and I guess I prefer the version of Geralt that sees the shades of grey in every decision, and finds life in all its forms to be worthy of treating with respect.
I did find the book easy to read, and enjoyed some of the minor details like Geralt discussing theories with Roach.
Caveat: I first got to know The Witcher through the games (I played all 3, and loved them), and then I watched the first 2 seasons of the adaptation. This means I went into this book with expectations and an element of fondness/nostalgia, which definitely impacted my reading experience in a positive way.
I'm still only giving this 3.5 stars.
The thing is, I don't think this series aged particularly well. It falls under that brand of fantasy written by men, where they feel free to create a universe where women are consistently abused because "that's how things used to be in the past". Never mind that this is a fantasy world. The stories are full of misogyny. Even capable women don't escape it. Instead of focusing on their strength or prowess on the battlefield, characters like Calanthe predominantly seem to be valued for her "hand and bed". Yennefer, one of the strongest sorceresses, gets the "let's show some nudity in a random fight scene just 'cause" treatment.
Looking past that, the world building remains extremely vague, and I question how much I would've understood about the tension between elves and humans without the knowledge I already had about the setting. I don't think most things are explained very well.
You do, eventually, get a sense of who Geralt is as a character, although even that I found disappointing, since the book seems to portray him as someone who has no issue killing humans to prove to some lord that he should be hired, or as someone who would potentially "mount a striga", as a priestess suggests. He didn't do the latter, but he definitely did the former, and I guess I prefer the version of Geralt that sees the shades of grey in every decision, and finds life in all its forms to be worthy of treating with respect.
I did find the book easy to read, and enjoyed some of the minor details like Geralt discussing theories with Roach.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny
Moderate: Incest, Physical abuse, and Rape