Scan barcode
skudiklier's review against another edition
emotional
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
I'm really not sure how I feel about this book. On one hand, I enjoyed reading it, and was very invested in what was going to happen. I wasn't at all bored by it because I knew how Pride and Prejudice goes, or anything like that.
On the other hand, for the first third of the book I hated all of the characters, and I still don't really like most of them by the end. There's a lot of transphobia, fatphobia, racism, and homophobia. Some of these are very clearly faults of the characters, but others are less easily dismissed. (More details on each of these under the spoiler warning.)
Transphobia: a major plot point in the novel is when a character is revealed to be trans, and this is treated very badly by almost every character. This is actually the one spoiler I knew ahead of time, because I'm trans and I read a little bit about this part of the book before starting it. But what I didn't realize is that even Lizzy was going to be weird and transphobic about it. She does quickly learn what she said/did was wrong, and becomes better towards the end of the book. But still, that section was frustrating and I didn't like it. It feels way out of proportion for her to fly home because of this, and to be honest I think Darcy forgives her too easily for this. Overall though it's clear Sittenfeld meant the transphobia to be a fault of the characters, and she herself doesn't agree with that, and so on and so on. I'm glad it was so clearly disputed in the book. But I still wouldn't have made that this big of a deal in the book at all.
Fatphobia: the fatphobia is one of the bigger issues I have with the book, as it's both blatant and not super clearly disagreed with. Lizzy as the narrator repeatedly says things like how she tries not to get caught up in diet talk, but that she's not completely successful. The characters' fatphobia is made fun of in some ways but reinforced in others. Charlotte is the only fat character that I can think of who is presented in a positive light, but she's repeatedly called unattractive--by the characters, but still. I think all of the characters who are portrayed as attractive are straight size, if not actively thin.
Racism: part of me wants to say the racism is disputed in similar ways to the transphobia, but I know I might also just be less focused on that since I'm white. Lizzy does definitely point out that several characters are racist, and this is seen as bad, and it's clear neither Lizzy as the narrator nor Sittenfeld as the author think any of the racism is okay. However, the casual racism just scattered throughout the book was still obviously not great, and I'm not sure how much of it was necessary or relevant to the plot.
Homophobia/lesbophobia: the homophobia was pretty bad in the beginning, and got a little better later on. I feel it could have been addressed more clearly, rather than just being accepted as normal, but I have less issue with the homophobia than with the rest of the things listed above. Lizzy's sisters are kind of awful about it though, and if you don't feel like reading a bunch of "haha you're a lesbian" "no I'm not" interactions, I wouldn't recommend this book.
Overall, I'm pretty torn on if I liked this book or would recommend it. In general I like Sittenfeld's writing, but the more of her books I read, I'm not sure if I should want to read them. I don't think this was a terrible retelling of Pride and Prejudice, though it's definitely a different story with different characters. I was also not super convinced by Darcy's character in general; I feel like in the beginning he was an almost irredeemable asshole, and then later he just sort of became nice and interesting. I don't buy that that's the same person with the same motivations.
On the other hand, for the first third of the book I hated all of the characters, and I still don't really like most of them by the end. There's a lot of transphobia, fatphobia, racism, and homophobia. Some of these are very clearly faults of the characters, but others are less easily dismissed. (More details on each of these under the spoiler warning.)
Transphobia: a major plot point in the novel is when a character is revealed to be trans, and this is treated very badly by almost every character. This is actually the one spoiler I knew ahead of time, because I'm trans and I read a little bit about this part of the book before starting it. But what I didn't realize is that even Lizzy was going to be weird and transphobic about it. She does quickly learn what she said/did was wrong, and becomes better towards the end of the book. But still, that section was frustrating and I didn't like it. It feels way out of proportion for her to fly home because of this, and to be honest I think Darcy forgives her too easily for this. Overall though it's clear Sittenfeld meant the transphobia to be a fault of the characters, and she herself doesn't agree with that, and so on and so on. I'm glad it was so clearly disputed in the book. But I still wouldn't have made that this big of a deal in the book at all.
Fatphobia: the fatphobia is one of the bigger issues I have with the book, as it's both blatant and not super clearly disagreed with. Lizzy as the narrator repeatedly says things like how she tries not to get caught up in diet talk, but that she's not completely successful. The characters' fatphobia is made fun of in some ways but reinforced in others. Charlotte is the only fat character that I can think of who is presented in a positive light, but she's repeatedly called unattractive--by the characters, but still. I think all of the characters who are portrayed as attractive are straight size, if not actively thin.
Racism: part of me wants to say the racism is disputed in similar ways to the transphobia, but I know I might also just be less focused on that since I'm white. Lizzy does definitely point out that several characters are racist, and this is seen as bad, and it's clear neither Lizzy as the narrator nor Sittenfeld as the author think any of the racism is okay. However, the casual racism just scattered throughout the book was still obviously not great, and I'm not sure how much of it was necessary or relevant to the plot.
Homophobia/lesbophobia: the homophobia was pretty bad in the beginning, and got a little better later on. I feel it could have been addressed more clearly, rather than just being accepted as normal, but I have less issue with the homophobia than with the rest of the things listed above. Lizzy's sisters are kind of awful about it though, and if you don't feel like reading a bunch of "haha you're a lesbian" "no I'm not" interactions, I wouldn't recommend this book.
Overall, I'm pretty torn on if I liked this book or would recommend it. In general I like Sittenfeld's writing, but the more of her books I read, I'm not sure if I should want to read them. I don't think this was a terrible retelling of Pride and Prejudice, though it's definitely a different story with different characters. I was also not super convinced by Darcy's character in general; I feel like in the beginning he was an almost irredeemable asshole, and then later he just sort of became nice and interesting. I don't buy that that's the same person with the same motivations.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Transphobia, Lesbophobia, Alcohol, and Classism
Moderate: Addiction, Hate crime, Incest, Racial slurs, Antisemitism, and Pregnancy
Minor: Ableism, Alcoholism, Death, Mental illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Vomit, Stalking, Murder, and Outing
transphobic slur (t slur)loveisland's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
5.0
I cannot stress this enough: it’s my favorite modern adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Most modern retellings fail because they don’t understand the satire and class commentary elements to Austen’s work. Don’t get me wrong. I love the romance between Elizabeth and Darcy in the original but that’s not the only point to Austen’s work. To reduce her work strictly to romance is to cheapen her wit and humor as a preeminent society analyst. Sittenfeld not only nails the class commentary but adds in racism, transphobia, fat phobia, and anti-Semitism to underscore the nuances of society as it currently is today. The people of color, trans folks, and folks of religious minorities are never the butt of any jokes; in fact, the naïveté, callousness, and frankly the “white, upper-middle-class”-ness of the Bennett family is what is on display all of which make sense to the class/status/habitus to which they belong.
Most importantly, Eligible retains the Spirit of the original: two deeply flawed people from stratospherically different class statuses fall in love and have to over come their pride and prejudices to do so. It tells the love story, yes, but also does a wonderful job of bringing in the other parts of the novel to the forefront.
Most importantly, Eligible retains the Spirit of the original: two deeply flawed people from stratospherically different class statuses fall in love and have to over come their pride and prejudices to do so. It tells the love story, yes, but also does a wonderful job of bringing in the other parts of the novel to the forefront.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Fatphobia, Racism, and Transphobia
Moderate: Eating disorder
tay_af's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
It is a truth universally acknowledged that just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should, and this book should not exist. It is maybe the worst book I’ve ever read. It featured an egregious misunderstanding of character dynamics and fundamental (and lovable) traits. Its attempts toward diversity were sloppy and self congratulatory at best, and more often, explicitly racist, homophobic, and transphobic in the execution, no matter how well intentioned it may have been. It’s insanely fatphobic as well: for instance, Charlotte Lucas’s undesirability which, in the original book, is principally linked to her lack of fortune and the fact that she is no great beauty, is replaced by a high paying job that cannot counter the fact she’s plus size. It’s a clear example in the need for sensitivity readers, even from authors who mean well. Beyond that, the writing is in general mediocre to abysmal, with terrible description and exposition. You have to try really hard to make Pride and Prejudice this bad, honestly. I could go on for days about it, but suffice to say, there are no redeeming qualities.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Fatphobia, Racism, and Transphobia
Moderate: Racial slurs and Pregnancy
Minor: Antisemitism and Acephobia/Arophobia
shelbybelby's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body shaming, Fatphobia, Racism, Transphobia, and Pregnancy
Moderate: Eating disorder, Homophobia, Incest, and Lesbophobia
rose10's review against another edition
2.0
This is described as a modern retelling of P&P but I had issue that many of the characters and the writing were homophobic, and had other stances which didn't sit right with me. I'm not sure whether this was the author's intention, but it felt unnecessary in the story. I also felt that Liz's and Darcy's relationship lacked the spark which is a central part of the plot.
While the setting and context of the story has certainly been updated, this book felt very uneven in its pacing, with chapters often being little more than a page and suddenly jumping from one plot point to a sudden random thing next and events being resolved very quickly. I felt this book had a lot of potential, and started out with some plot points which I thought could have been very interesting, but ultimately this book fell flat and missed the mark.
While the setting and context of the story has certainly been updated, this book felt very uneven in its pacing, with chapters often being little more than a page and suddenly jumping from one plot point to a sudden random thing next and events being resolved very quickly. I felt this book had a lot of potential, and started out with some plot points which I thought could have been very interesting, but ultimately this book fell flat and missed the mark.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Transphobia
Minor: Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, and Antisemitism
lenaricharz's review against another edition
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Body shaming, Cursing, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Infertility, Racism, Transphobia, Antisemitism, Pregnancy, and Lesbophobia
nothingforpomegranted's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Like most devoted bookworms out there, I have a particular passion for Pride and Prejudice and all that Jane Austen has contributed to the literary world over the past two hundred years.
Unfortunately, Curtis Sittenfeld's Pride and Prejudice retelling for The Austen Project just didn't cut it for me. Though Sittenfeld did an admirable job adjusting the Pride and Prejudice story to modern times in Cincinnati, incorporating characters and events in surprising but logical ways, her renditions of Liz, Darcy, and the rest of the Bennet family and cast were flat and unsatisfying.
We begin with the arrival of Chip Bingley, one-time star of find-love reality show Eligible in Cincinnati, where Liz and Jane Bennet have been visiting from New York after their father's heart attack only to discover the family house and financial situation in near ruin. While Liz prioritizes her job as a writer for a women's magazine and trying not to worry about her fourteen-year affair with her married best friend, Jasper Wick, Jane is pursuing motherhood through artificial insemination, which gets complicated when she enters a whirlwind flirtation with Chip Bingley himself.
Of course, the true star of a Pride and Prejudice retelling should be one Fitzwilliam Darcy. Sittenfeld's Darcy is an accomplished neurosurgeon with massive California estate and a seeming commitment to bachelorhood. In fact, I quite liked this version of Darcy, and I appreciated Sittenfeld's acknowledgement of how much Darcy smiles in the original book (I certainly like him more than Sittenfeld's whiny, clueless Liz); however, as the book reached its climax, so much happened so quickly, and Darcy's sudden confession felt so much more unexpected and dramatic than the original.
In short:
Jasper Wick sucks and the fact that Liz pined over him for over a decade is a shame, particularly for a character based on one of the most independent, feisty women in literature.
Bingley and Jane were done very well. I loved Jane's modernized storyline, and I thought they both exhibited their characteristic naive sweetness in a charming way.
Lydia and Ham were intriguing and sympathetic, which is a bold move given the drama surrounding Lydia's storyline in the original. It's not clear to me whether Sittenfeld wanted this partnership to be as damning as Austen's, so I want to give her the benefit of the doubt and accept this as an interesting shift in the retelling.
Mary weirdly got the last word, and I don't really understand what she did to deserve it.
The discriminatory language--racist, homophobic, body shaming--was appalling, especially given this book's relatively recent publication date. Nearly every page had some sort of inappropriate comment or language, and it poisoned me against so many of the characters.
Unfortunately, Curtis Sittenfeld's Pride and Prejudice retelling for The Austen Project just didn't cut it for me. Though Sittenfeld did an admirable job adjusting the Pride and Prejudice story to modern times in Cincinnati, incorporating characters and events in surprising but logical ways, her renditions of Liz, Darcy, and the rest of the Bennet family and cast were flat and unsatisfying.
We begin with the arrival of Chip Bingley, one-time star of find-love reality show Eligible in Cincinnati, where Liz and Jane Bennet have been visiting from New York after their father's heart attack only to discover the family house and financial situation in near ruin. While Liz prioritizes her job as a writer for a women's magazine and trying not to worry about her fourteen-year affair with her married best friend, Jasper Wick, Jane is pursuing motherhood through artificial insemination, which gets complicated when she enters a whirlwind flirtation with Chip Bingley himself.
Of course, the true star of a Pride and Prejudice retelling should be one Fitzwilliam Darcy. Sittenfeld's Darcy is an accomplished neurosurgeon with massive California estate and a seeming commitment to bachelorhood. In fact, I quite liked this version of Darcy, and I appreciated Sittenfeld's acknowledgement of how much Darcy smiles in the original book (I certainly like him more than Sittenfeld's whiny, clueless Liz); however, as the book reached its climax, so much happened so quickly, and Darcy's sudden confession felt so much more unexpected and dramatic than the original.
In short:
Jasper Wick sucks and the fact that Liz pined over him for over a decade is a shame, particularly for a character based on one of the most independent, feisty women in literature.
Bingley and Jane were done very well. I loved Jane's modernized storyline, and I thought they both exhibited their characteristic naive sweetness in a charming way.
Lydia and Ham were intriguing and sympathetic, which is a bold move given the drama surrounding Lydia's storyline in the original. It's not clear to me whether Sittenfeld wanted this partnership to be as damning as Austen's, so I want to give her the benefit of the doubt and accept this as an interesting shift in the retelling.
Mary weirdly got the last word, and I don't really understand what she did to deserve it.
The discriminatory language--racist, homophobic, body shaming--was appalling, especially given this book's relatively recent publication date. Nearly every page had some sort of inappropriate comment or language, and it poisoned me against so many of the characters.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body shaming, Infidelity, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, and Pregnancy
Moderate: Deadnaming, Fatphobia, Infertility, Medical content, and Medical trauma
diana_barv's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
medium-paced
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
I can’t decide whether I liked this or not. It was fun I think, mostly the first half. But Mrs. Bennet was WAY too much and the way the book treated some issues... yikes.
The Chip and Jane romance was... okay. And Liz and Darcy had their moments but the part where “Darcy saves Lydia” just didn’t accomplished it like the original or other retellings.
Overall, I read it way faster that I thought I would and it was enjoyable most of the time
The Chip and Jane romance was... okay. And Liz and Darcy had their moments but the part where “Darcy saves Lydia” just didn’t accomplished it like the original or other retellings.
Overall, I read it way faster that I thought I would and it was enjoyable most of the time
Content Warnings
Minor: Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Racism, and Transphobia