You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
It’s been 30 plus years since I’ve read about Alice. I was a stage hand in a school production of it when I was about 15, so I knew the story quite well.
It’s a great book. Quite unique in that although it’s Victorian (first published 1865) it doesn’t have any moral undertone - it’s just written for fun. I really enjoyed revisiting it and I must dig out my copy of Through the Looking Glass to read soon!
It’s a great book. Quite unique in that although it’s Victorian (first published 1865) it doesn’t have any moral undertone - it’s just written for fun. I really enjoyed revisiting it and I must dig out my copy of Through the Looking Glass to read soon!
adventurous
funny
mysterious
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
N/A
I have never liked this story, and reading it again now (audio read by Geoffrey Giuliano, couldn't find the edition on Storygraph) at 2x speed) has confirmed that for me once and for all. It is too nonsensical and conveys no meaning for me, nor the charm that I usually love about classic children's literature. However, I've given it 2 stars instead of 1 because I know it is beloved by many, has stood the test of time, and I get the feeling that there must be something I'm missing, even some deeper meaning perhaps.
funny
lighthearted
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I was impressed by the wit on display. Half the book seems to be Alice getting into arguments with other characters haha
fast-paced
adventurous
lighthearted
medium-paced
adventurous
hopeful
adventurous
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No