Scan barcode
carolinemb's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
Graphic: Excrement, Genocide, Murder, Physical abuse, Animal death, Child death, Confinement, Cultural appropriation, Cursing, Injury/Injury detail, Racism, Rape, Sexual violence, Sexual assault, Violence, Ableism, Blood, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Hate crime, Misogyny, Alcohol, Animal cruelty, Colonisation, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, War, and Xenophobia
izzyjuell's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Gore, Animal cruelty, Animal death, and Racial slurs
ciinamongiirl's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Colonisation, Gore, Hate crime, War, Pedophilia, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, Cursing, Racial slurs, Blood, Death, Genocide, Racism, and Violence
gorbon's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Gore, Body horror, Death, Racial slurs, Injury/Injury detail, and Violence
Moderate: Pedophilia, Sexual assault, Blood, Religious bigotry, Adult/minor relationship, and Alcoholism
shakita45's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
I read this book on the recommendation of a YouTuber (wendigoon) and it's so far outside my usual wheelhouse that I honestly felt kind of stupid in a way I haven't felt when trying to read a book since high school. I just didn't Get It, you know? I feel like I understand the themes and the overall message, but the more granular details and the subtleties just went right over my head.
Graphic: Racism, Animal cruelty, Violence, Racial slurs, Animal death, and Gore
Holy shit just do not read this book if you don't have a strong stomach, it's graphic as helllindsgiovannone's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Violence, Injury/Injury detail, Colonisation, Murder, Gun violence, Physical abuse, Animal death, Abandonment, Death, Gore, Sexual violence, and Animal cruelty
eabosch's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Blood, Domestic abuse, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual assault, Violence, Animal cruelty, Child death, Racial slurs, Sexual violence, Gun violence, Injury/Injury detail, Sexual harassment, Animal death, Child abuse, Genocide, Murder, Sexual content, War, Xenophobia, Torture, Alcohol, Cursing, Death, Emotional abuse, Fire/Fire injury, Gore, Pedophilia, Racism, Excrement, Hate crime, Mental illness, Rape, and Alcoholism
hatsworth's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Moral law is an invention of mankind. A moral view can never be proven right or wrong by any ultimate test. A man falling dead in a duel is not thought thereby to be proven in error as to his views. His very involvement in such a trial gives evidence of a new and broader view. For the argument is indeed trivial, but not so the separate wills thereby made manifest. Decisions of life and death, of what shall be and what shall not, beggar all question of right . In elections of these magnitudes are all lesser ones subsumed, moral, spiritual, natural.
~ Judge Holden, Blood Meridian
For whoever makes a shelter of reeds and hides has joined his spirit to the common destiny of creatures, and he will subside back into the primal mud with scarcely a cry. But who builds in stone seeks to alter the structure of the universe...
The Kid is a natural-born killer, a dead-eye in every sense of the word. Whenever the situation absolutely calls for violence, he demonstrates his profound ability for death. However, at all other times, he is resolved to take a neutral stance and subscribes to a 'live and let live' approach. In doing so, his very existence is offensive to Holden, who sees the boy as a warrior. Neither character gets any development here. McCarthy puts these two people in motion. You will have to read the novel to discover what happens when The Kid's immovable neutrality collides with Holden's unstoppable force of will.
Graphic: Murder, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Racism, and Racial slurs
Moderate: Pedophilia and Rape
ajlct's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Fire/Fire injury, Murder, Racial slurs, Racism, Blood, Colonisation, Cursing, War, Animal death, Death, Genocide, Gore, Gun violence, Animal cruelty, Child death, and Violence
Moderate: Rape, Sexual assault, and Sexual violence
lars702's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Blood, Child death, Gun violence, Violence, Murder, Animal cruelty, and Genocide