Scan barcode
ajsmith_7's review against another edition
3.5
Another good Elementary book. I didn't enjoy this quite as much as the first book, 'Ghost Line'.
The plot that was centered around hedge funds and investments was not particularly interesting to me but as with the first book all the characters we know and love were spot on and portrayed exactly as they are in the show.
One slightly annoying thing that has stood out to me now after reading both books is the authors habit of repeating certain phrases over and over again in his writing, "in the middle distance" being far and away the worst offender.
Still very enjoyable though and would definitely recommend to any Elementary fans.
The plot that was centered around hedge funds and investments was not particularly interesting to me but as with the first book all the characters we know and love were spot on and portrayed exactly as they are in the show.
One slightly annoying thing that has stood out to me now after reading both books is the authors habit of repeating certain phrases over and over again in his writing, "in the middle distance" being far and away the worst offender.
Still very enjoyable though and would definitely recommend to any Elementary fans.
elsjls00's review against another edition
1.0
Tried starting it 4 times and never got farther than page 48. Disappointing.
momopeach's review against another edition
4.0
In all honesty this was probably a three star book but the mental image of Joan popping up from the backseat of a car and threatening a murder suspect with a jam spoon is worth a star by itself. A solid read overall, Christopher successfully transferred the characters from the screen to the page in such a way that I could see them in my minds eye as I read.
danslalune's review
funny
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
sarah1984's review against another edition
2.0
28/6 - I haven't read a good crime/mystery thriller in quite a while, unfortunately after finally finishing this book I'm still waiting.
I love Elementary and watch it religiously, especially the first two seasons. The channel it plays on in Australia has played seasons one and two about six times, only just now getting to season three (currently up to episode 18) and when it finishes they'll probably take us back to the beginning all over again. I keep watching those first two seasons because that way I can keep track of it and don't have to worry about missing it when they start showing a season I haven't seen. When I saw this book on the new and recently returned shelf at the library I was quite excited to read a new story from the Elementary world. This didn't live up to the expectations set by the tv show. Most of the story was told from Joan's point of view and if you took this book at face value I'd be questioning Holmes' faith in Watson, because being in Watson's head was quite boring and unenlightening. I think (I hope) Joan's deductive reasoning was dumbed down for the reader who couldn't quite make the deductive leaps that Joan does in the show. I've taken the below excerpt from pages 62-64 (remember that the murder weapon is a fountain pen, not a spoiler as we're told this on the back of the book)
'"Did you find something?"
Ah, alas not," said Holmes. "I was speaking purely theoretically. Our victim was fastidious in his neatness, it seems."
"Tell me about it. I've never seen a desk so tidy. But it seems our victim didn't use fountain pens."
Watson held up her discovery - a small oblong box of white card. There was an open flap at one end, with a scuff and tear indicating where a piece of tape had once sealed the opening. Watson shook the box, and it rattled. Then she peeled back the flap and turned the opening toward Holmes so he could see.
Holmes pursed his lips. "Pen refill cartridges."
"Ballpoint pen refills," said Watson, extracting a thin gold cylinder between a finger and thumb. "And the box has been opened. This looks like it's come from the office stationery cupboard - no marking or label, so probably from a bulk supply."
Holmes glanced at the desk. "But no sign of any pens, ballpoint or otherwise."
[...] Unimportant couple of paragraphs showing why they don't need to look for ballpoint pens.
Watson frowned. "But like you said, there are no pens in this office. I guess he had a favourite he carried around with him."
"And yet," said Holmes, "the only pen found at the crime scene was embedded four inches into the man's cranium."
"A pen that apparently wasn't his."
Holmes cocked his head at Watson. "Apparently so, although hardly a concrete deduction."
With this, he strode to the office door and stepped through, quickly. Watson followed, but by the time she reached the doorway Holmes was far ahead, striding out across the open-plan area of the main office.
Watson stopped in the doorway to watch. As Holmes came to each desk in the main office, he paused, casting an eye over it with a look of grim determination, before moving to the next. If there was a person at the desk, he ignored them - and their protests - even when his search involved wheeling a chair - with the workers still on it - out of the way to pull open a drawer. After a few moments of this everyone in the office was watching him along with Watson.
As Holmes completed a circuit of the office, Watson headed around the other side to head him off.
"What are you looking for?" she asked.
Holmes stopped, his arms ramrod straight by his side.
"The murderer," he said, before ducking to Watson's left to continue his bizarre mission down the centre aisle of desks. At the first he stopped a little longer to examine the contents of two drawers before moving to the next.
Then Watson realized what he was doing.'
Why did it take Watson, Holmes' protégé in the art of deductive reasoning, so long to realise what he was doing when it was clear to me from the moment he started looking? It was at this point that I started to feel like the book was written for younger readers who had zero powers of deduction and were unable to work anything out on their own. From this point on I frequently felt like the book was taking great pains to explain very obvious deductions to me and that made me frustrated with all the extra laying out of the plot that happened. I reckon 20+ pages of unnecessary explanations could have been excised from the book with hardly any effort.
I did not guess who was behind the killings until a few pages before it was revealed, but.
I might consider giving the author/series another go, but I certainly won't be searching for [b:Elementary: The Ghost Line|25017213|Elementary The Ghost Line (Elementary, #1)|Adam Christopher|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1424875836s/25017213.jpg|43012685] at the library.
I love Elementary and watch it religiously, especially the first two seasons. The channel it plays on in Australia has played seasons one and two about six times, only just now getting to season three (currently up to episode 18) and when it finishes they'll probably take us back to the beginning all over again. I keep watching those first two seasons because that way I can keep track of it and don't have to worry about missing it when they start showing a season I haven't seen. When I saw this book on the new and recently returned shelf at the library I was quite excited to read a new story from the Elementary world. This didn't live up to the expectations set by the tv show. Most of the story was told from Joan's point of view and if you took this book at face value I'd be questioning Holmes' faith in Watson, because being in Watson's head was quite boring and unenlightening. I think (I hope) Joan's deductive reasoning was dumbed down for the reader who couldn't quite make the deductive leaps that Joan does in the show. I've taken the below excerpt from pages 62-64 (remember that the murder weapon is a fountain pen, not a spoiler as we're told this on the back of the book)
'"Did you find something?"
Ah, alas not," said Holmes. "I was speaking purely theoretically. Our victim was fastidious in his neatness, it seems."
"Tell me about it. I've never seen a desk so tidy. But it seems our victim didn't use fountain pens."
Watson held up her discovery - a small oblong box of white card. There was an open flap at one end, with a scuff and tear indicating where a piece of tape had once sealed the opening. Watson shook the box, and it rattled. Then she peeled back the flap and turned the opening toward Holmes so he could see.
Holmes pursed his lips. "Pen refill cartridges."
"Ballpoint pen refills," said Watson, extracting a thin gold cylinder between a finger and thumb. "And the box has been opened. This looks like it's come from the office stationery cupboard - no marking or label, so probably from a bulk supply."
Holmes glanced at the desk. "But no sign of any pens, ballpoint or otherwise."
[...] Unimportant couple of paragraphs showing why they don't need to look for ballpoint pens.
Watson frowned. "But like you said, there are no pens in this office. I guess he had a favourite he carried around with him."
"And yet," said Holmes, "the only pen found at the crime scene was embedded four inches into the man's cranium."
"A pen that apparently wasn't his."
Holmes cocked his head at Watson. "Apparently so, although hardly a concrete deduction."
With this, he strode to the office door and stepped through, quickly. Watson followed, but by the time she reached the doorway Holmes was far ahead, striding out across the open-plan area of the main office.
Watson stopped in the doorway to watch. As Holmes came to each desk in the main office, he paused, casting an eye over it with a look of grim determination, before moving to the next. If there was a person at the desk, he ignored them - and their protests - even when his search involved wheeling a chair - with the workers still on it - out of the way to pull open a drawer. After a few moments of this everyone in the office was watching him along with Watson.
As Holmes completed a circuit of the office, Watson headed around the other side to head him off.
"What are you looking for?" she asked.
Holmes stopped, his arms ramrod straight by his side.
"The murderer," he said, before ducking to Watson's left to continue his bizarre mission down the centre aisle of desks. At the first he stopped a little longer to examine the contents of two drawers before moving to the next.
Then Watson realized what he was doing.'
Why did it take Watson, Holmes' protégé in the art of deductive reasoning, so long to realise what he was doing when it was clear to me from the moment he started looking? It was at this point that I started to feel like the book was written for younger readers who had zero powers of deduction and were unable to work anything out on their own. From this point on I frequently felt like the book was taking great pains to explain very obvious deductions to me and that made me frustrated with all the extra laying out of the plot that happened. I reckon 20+ pages of unnecessary explanations could have been excised from the book with hardly any effort.
I did not guess who was behind the killings until a few pages before it was revealed, but
Spoiler
it had to be who it was, unless Christopher was going to introduce a completely new character to take the part of the big boss, because all the other secondary characters had already been ruled out or killedI might consider giving the author/series another go, but I certainly won't be searching for [b:Elementary: The Ghost Line|25017213|Elementary The Ghost Line (Elementary, #1)|Adam Christopher|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1424875836s/25017213.jpg|43012685] at the library.
hdegrave's review against another edition
4.0
I received this book through a giveaway here on Goodreads.
I really enjoy the Elementary TV series, so I thought this book would be good as well. This book is not written by the same the creator of the TV series and the author has another book for this series.
The book was good. It really helped to understand Holmes per the TV show. His mannerisms and accent helped when reading. I think the book followed the story line that the show would have followed as well. I would read more from this author.
I really enjoy the Elementary TV series, so I thought this book would be good as well. This book is not written by the same the creator of the TV series and the author has another book for this series.
The book was good. It really helped to understand Holmes per the TV show. His mannerisms and accent helped when reading. I think the book followed the story line that the show would have followed as well. I would read more from this author.
tardislibrarian's review against another edition
3.0
Murder by . . . . a vintage fountain pen?
There were a couple of errors in this book, the major one being a date continuity error (unless I'd been utterly confused, especially since it'd been written on the same page.)
But I think Holmes could have been more, well . . . Holmes. I think the writing of his character could have been pushed to its usual level as it is on the show.
Still, not a bad read. It was an interesting and twisted mystery. Money is almost always the cause.
There were a couple of errors in this book, the major one being a date continuity error (unless I'd been utterly confused, especially since it'd been written on the same page.)
But I think Holmes could have been more, well . . . Holmes. I think the writing of his character could have been pushed to its usual level as it is on the show.
Still, not a bad read. It was an interesting and twisted mystery. Money is almost always the cause.
geohiker's review against another edition
3.0
I loved this TV show. The books aren't quite as fun, but still enjoyable.
More...