Scan barcode
simonator's review against another edition
4.0
Überraschend überzeugend, auch wenn es auf einer gewissen oberflächlichen Ebene die Schrift einer gekränkten Künstlerseele bleibt, die neuartige Kunsttechnologien nicht mag. Aber die Argumente zur Zerstreueng vs Sammlung der Gesell chaft im Angesichts der massig reproduzierbaren Kunst sind lohnenswerte Lektüre.
theaurochs's review against another edition
4.0
It’s frankly difficult to comprehend, sitting here in the closing days of the first quarter of the 21st century, quite how different my relationship with *art* is to the majority of the existence of humanity. At any time I desire, 24 hours a day every day of the year, I have access to a functionally limitless supply of paintings, books, videos, music, animation, photographs; whatever I want. And I have access to this via a device small enough to fit into my hand. The wonder of smartphones is still new enough for most of us that hopefully we don’t take it completely for granted yet, the technology still has a layer of transparency that makes it noticeable to us. But smartphones are the obvious example. I could, for example, buy a carton of milk, which has on it a photograph of some of the oat branches that went into producing it. I can take a picture, and reproduce it as many times as I want, using a printer. This “mass-production” is something that, prior to the 20th century, was completely unthinkable, and has undoubtedly shaped the ways in which we react to and interact with art, in all meanings of the word.
In the titular essay of this short collection, Benjamin takes us through some of their interpretations of the consequences of the mass availability of art, as well as the powers and implications of new art forms such as photography and film. It also explores the intersections with capitalism, in the context of mass-production and commodification. It is incredibly interesting, and asks many questions that I had never even thought to ask. Truly illuminating, and this essay by itself is a clear 5/5.
But, like many of these admittedly gorgeous Penguin Great Ideas editions (I mean, look at that cover and tell me it isn’t genius), there are other essays in here too. And frankly I was not too interested in either of them; one an overview and critical analysis of the themes and in Kafka’s work, and the other a somewhat over-effusive review of the work of Proust. Couldn’t at all find myself caring about either topic, and they drag the collection down overall.
In the titular essay of this short collection, Benjamin takes us through some of their interpretations of the consequences of the mass availability of art, as well as the powers and implications of new art forms such as photography and film. It also explores the intersections with capitalism, in the context of mass-production and commodification. It is incredibly interesting, and asks many questions that I had never even thought to ask. Truly illuminating, and this essay by itself is a clear 5/5.
But, like many of these admittedly gorgeous Penguin Great Ideas editions (I mean, look at that cover and tell me it isn’t genius), there are other essays in here too. And frankly I was not too interested in either of them; one an overview and critical analysis of the themes and in Kafka’s work, and the other a somewhat over-effusive review of the work of Proust. Couldn’t at all find myself caring about either topic, and they drag the collection down overall.
alabamakpex's review against another edition
Well written but repetitive, I liked the notions and sentiments but feel as though it’s main points and arguments are made succinctly enough in the first half, perhaps I am wrong. Will
Pick back up if and when.
Pick back up if and when.
l44l's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
1.0
Came for the titular essay of this book, which was good. Got two surprise essays which I did not ask for, did not want, and did not understand.
tcerafice's review against another edition
4.0
recommended by my teacher high key a great read. tried to capture this idea in my research paper but failed. his idea about the aura of art and how that is lost when we mechanically reproduce art is amazing.