Reviews with content warning for Death - Emma

Reviews tagging 'Death'

Emma by Jane Austen, Jane Austen

31 reviews

sirpandacat's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional lighthearted reflective

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Content Warnings

ellie_deb's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted relaxing slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

This was my first Jane Austen book. The language does take a while to get used to, but the intricacies of Austen's work are definitely worth reading! The humour and wit behind many passages makes for an enjoyable reading experience. The main downside to this book was how the plot is all character based, and a lot of gossiping which is interesting to an extent but I did get a bit sick of. I ended up loving Emma as a protagonist, though somewhat rude at the start, she had a great personality and I loved her relationship with her father and her

friendship turned romance with Mr Knightley.

Mrs Weston and Harriet were some other favourites.

Content Warnings

leanneymu's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny lighthearted reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Once I had tuned my brain to the language, I really enjoyed this. It's funny, lovely and a bit disconcerting to realise that human behaviour hasn't really changed since the early 19th century.

Content Warnings

ghostsversion's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

After many years of struggling to get through the first few chapters, only to later give up ~~and delete any previous reading entry so to not mark it as DNF~~, I have finally finished this book. On the whole I would say that this was an interesting read. Additionally, since I kinda knew what some of the twists were it was very fun when I noticed hints or scenes that foreshadowed the twists like

all the interactions of Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax.

A really big thing in this book, in my opinion at least, was the miscommunication between the characters which while it may be frustrating in other books here it was understandable as most characters were looking at things in a way that satisfies their own desires. Except a few moments that would be very controversial if added to modern books,

namely Harriet Smith being attacked by a group of g***ies and Mr Knigtley professing that he has loved Emma since she was 13 while they have a 16 year age difference,

I really liked this book.

Content Warnings

gcoulsxn's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted reflective relaxing slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

wooblatoober's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny lighthearted slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

i’m surprised to say i really enjoyed this book, especially as i got to the end. it was an exceedingly difficult read for me since it was published in 1815 (not my reading forte), & i had many complaints at the beginning, but all of them were assuaged as the book went on.

below is my spoiler-riddled feminist discussion about the book.

besides interactions with men in which emma is empowered, i really appreciate her relationship with jane—she doesn’t like her at first, a bit arbitrarily and a bit due to jealousy in ways, it seems—but they become friends at the end, & hot girls being friends instead of having a rivalry is just so sexy. & THEN, mr. knightley is dreamy lol! i suspected at the beginning that she would be wrong about everything, he would be right about everything, and they’d get married because he’s “good for her” or some shit. but i was pleasantly wrong. emma, who is much younger than mr. knightley (which i feel gives her much better reason to be wrong, rather than just being a woman lol), is wrong about a lot of things—BUT!!! mr. knightley is wrong about things, too. not only that, he seeks out harriet to get to know her and try to see emma’s side, & OPENLY ADMITS to emma that he was wrong about her. & there was something sweet to me about their convo about how emma treated miss bates—mr. knightley wasn’t mad, & didn’t think she meant to be mean. he just told her it hurt miss bates’s feelings—no unsolicited advice, just the facts he believed she would have wanted to know. not to mention mr. knightley MOVED IN WITH HER when they got married, despite being richer, having a better home, & being in a relatively higher place in society (i think), just so her dad wouldn’t be upset. even though they /did/ believe stress back then would make you die, i still believe it’s sweet, especially for the time period. i think any other man would at least just put off the wedding until mr. woodhouse died, at the least. more impatient men might even insist she moves in with him with her father, or even without mr. woodhouse.

i really liked emma. i feel like i could relate to her in a lot of ways, and i really enjoyed that. it was almost like the book was being written from my own point of view—i thought the same way as emma, like, the whole time lol. i didn’t even see a lot of twists coming that i think the reader was meant to see.

the classism bothered me, the belief that your blood firmly cements you into what kind of person you can be, and i understand that it would have been even more feminist for emma to never get married,

let alone to a man who was an adult when he fell in love with her when she was 13.

but i also want to acknowledge first that

she was an adult when he confessed to her and when they got married,

and again that this was written in 1815, and how much we don’t understand about the culture of england in that time period unless we’re scholars who study it. there are so many subtleties that go over our heads, that were outrageously feminist for the time. i can’t ask for a woman growing up in the late 1700s—not only growing up with those ideologies and understandings of society, but writing her books for other people living in the early 1800s who have those ideologies and understandings of society, and living with the consequences of what she publishes, or what she can even get published—to be completely politically correct for 2024. like she was wrong in those aspects—the classism, the

power relationship mr. knightley would have more realistically had over her,

the fact that she could have stayed single. it was 200 years ago. she was right in a lot of other ways, and that’s what i enjoyed.

not to mention austen purposely wrote it as a romance, so emma might as well fall in love with the one man who ever admits he’s wrong lmao.

i just wanted to add this to my review after seeing so many reviews that complained about those things. it’s still a book written 200 years ago, & that’s something to keep in mind so you can enjoy it in its context.

Content Warnings

machenn's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

linnylionheart's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

bessadams's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

readingwithcoffee's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny hopeful lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

There’s a lot of classism in the book but we have narrator so I wouldn’t say the book fully believes any of it though probably some give. The context and times the book was made in and class of the author and so forth. But the only racism it is not five stars is the random but very explicit racism to Romani people in like chapters 39 to 42 out if 55 where a begging child is seen as some danger to this delicate white wealthy women and just popping out of bushes to ambush them god forbid for money. Incredibly ridiculous and racist.

It had some weird age gap stuff not even the age gap itself but like complimenting the male interest for watching and participating in her childhood which never of as grooming per se but was kinda creepy and and screamed father issues to me. Otherwise a lot of fun with a spoiled unreliable narrator.

Content Warnings

More...