Reviews

The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu

lych's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.25

The science was interesting but the book was so so boring to read 

gossamerwings's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

and_abigail's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Too much science explanation, zero character development and not that much plot either. Very disappointing considering how popular it is

petrusten's review against another edition

Go to review page

inspiring mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

glynnbear's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No

4.75

super chewy sci-fi. fantastic read, scientific explanation and exploration can be dense to wade through as a layperson but concepts are very rewarding and unique. 

maxgreene666's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

mybookhaven's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense

3.0

eddasm's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.75

rj_readsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

1.0

This book was so boring and lacked a cohesive plot with a reason to care about it. This is the exact type of 'hard sci-fi' that I don't enjoy because it uses very big words and intellectual concepts to hide the lack of plot and plot holes while also failing to provide us with a reason for the characters to care all that much. I can see why people love it -- it's built in a lab to make people who only sort of understand science feel smart, while the author throws out scientific words and language to create a smokescreen in front of the two-dimensional characters and plot holes.

tabularasa's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5