Scan barcode
alextbrouwer's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
lauraborkpower's review against another edition
3.0
I was hoping to like this more than I did. The idea of it--of starting a zombie apocalypse story when society has started rebuilding its bureaucracy and is cleaning up the city zone by zone--is interesting. But that framework made this story different from other Z.A. stories in another respect: for most of the story there didn't feel to be a very serious threat. It's quiet. And that is, in this type of book, a little disappointing.
In other Z.A. stories, the zombies are there and a force to be reckoned with, but the real threats are the other groups of people fighting for survival. And they're threatening because society has lost its structure, its rules. It's anarchy, and we follow the survivors as they try to piece together a life within that lawlessness.
But in Whitehead's story, the structure is being rebuilt, there are rules, and people seem to follow them. The zombies ("skells") are few, and there are even skell "stragglers" that seem to pose no threat at all. And that's where I was having a problem with this book; it's a bit low-stakes. There are, though, many flashbacks that our protagonist, Mark Spitz (a nickname), goes through to explain the night of the apocalypse and his fight for survival following it. But, and this might be because I listened to the audiobook, I found these to be confusing and hard to follow. He slipped in and out of present and flashback that I had trouble following where we were and who the narrator was talking about. I'd have had an easier time with it in hard copy, but there shouldn't have been that much of a difference.
I also never felt too close to Mark Spitz. He had a good story, and I liked him--and I really liked that we finally have a black hero in a Z.A. story--but I never really felt connected to him. The narrator, Beresford Bennett, does a good job, and it's an interesting addition to the genre. But it's atypical, for better or for worse, so be warned.
In other Z.A. stories, the zombies are there and a force to be reckoned with, but the real threats are the other groups of people fighting for survival. And they're threatening because society has lost its structure, its rules. It's anarchy, and we follow the survivors as they try to piece together a life within that lawlessness.
But in Whitehead's story, the structure is being rebuilt, there are rules, and people seem to follow them. The zombies ("skells") are few, and there are even skell "stragglers" that seem to pose no threat at all. And that's where I was having a problem with this book; it's a bit low-stakes. There are, though, many flashbacks that our protagonist, Mark Spitz (a nickname), goes through to explain the night of the apocalypse and his fight for survival following it. But, and this might be because I listened to the audiobook, I found these to be confusing and hard to follow. He slipped in and out of present and flashback that I had trouble following where we were and who the narrator was talking about. I'd have had an easier time with it in hard copy, but there shouldn't have been that much of a difference.
I also never felt too close to Mark Spitz. He had a good story, and I liked him--and I really liked that we finally have a black hero in a Z.A. story--but I never really felt connected to him. The narrator, Beresford Bennett, does a good job, and it's an interesting addition to the genre. But it's atypical, for better or for worse, so be warned.
hirvimaki's review against another edition
2.0
I'm of two minds. The writing is beautiful, artful, almost...luscious. And yet...the story just isn't interesting. You get glimpses of how the story really could be something more, but then it gets washed under wave upon wave of this too-pretty, self-important prose. Like a Tennyson poem without any substance. And really, in the end, if there's no substance what's the point? Another reviewer wrote that this book was a "thinking man's zombie novel", but in reality it's just dressed up as a thinking man's zombie novel; a caricature. Because it remains completely unaware of it's own shortcomings it ends up more sad parody than clever pastiche.
mrpetej's review against another edition
dark
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
heidipolkissa82's review against another edition
challenging
dark
funny
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
acanthae's review against another edition
slow-paced
1.0
The last 75% of this did not get better.
Also, overwritten =/= literary and I am tired of that style of writing. This book isn't good. Colson Whitehead seems like he sniffs his own farts.
Also, overwritten =/= literary and I am tired of that style of writing. This book isn't good. Colson Whitehead seems like he sniffs his own farts.
sarahphoenix's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
penguin428's review
adventurous
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0