Smith of Wootton Major was weird and boring.

Farmer Giles of Ham was cheesy but entertaining.

Fun little stories, even farther on the "just for fun" scale than The Hobbit.

2/100 - 1949 - Farmer Giles of Ham by J.R.R Tolkien

This little story was a fun and quick read. It reminds me of old English stories but is filled with Tolkien’s humor. And I love this old copy I found. It’s in the same style of my dad’s old copies of The Hobbit and LOTR. I’m glad I bought a copy, for I think it’ll be a fun tale to read to my boys when they’re older.
adventurous funny lighthearted relaxing medium-paced
adventurous funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted relaxing fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
adventurous funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Smith - 2.75
Farmer - 4.0

FYI, these books are available individually also. 

Note to self - read and own a different edition with only Smith in it.

A couple of shorter pieces of "fairy tale" fiction by J.R.R. Tolkien (quite unrelated to his Middle Earth legendarium) , which I read with my 4th grade kids (11 and 9 years old). I love Tolkien! "Farmer Giles of Ham" also has a fair bit of Latin in it, which is always nice!

I was inspired to take another look at these two short tales because of how they were described by John Hendrix in his book [b:The Mythmakers: The Remarkable Fellowship of C.S. Lewis & J.R.R. Tolkien|208512484|The Mythmakers The Remarkable Fellowship of C.S. Lewis & J.R.R. Tolkien|John Hendrix|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1709091493l/208512484._SX50_.jpg|214638198] . I remember not thinking much of them when I read them originally, and, while Hendrix swears Smith of Wooten Major is an allegory (while Tolkien swore he didn't write allegories) I still don't see much in either tale. Smith is the stronger of the two, and the more entertaining.
For Tolkien scholars, you can see a lot of his interests and scholarship in these tales, but they lack the inventiveness of his other works.
adventurous fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Good read, especially the second short story. Funny ending but it shows its age a bit