Reviews

Ancestral Night by Elizabeth Bear

bookph1le's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Though this was a long book, two weeks is far longer than it would normally take me to read a book like this. Even one would have been longer than usual.

There are a couple of reasons why it took me so long to read this book. For one, I wasn't devoting much time to reading in general because I was caught up in other things. For another, I read a bunch of middle grade graphic novels while also reading this, which ate into what little time I did spend reading. But the other thing that contributed to what took me so long to read this was that I kept walking away from it, not because I didn't like it, but because I'd find myself getting impatient with it. It was strange, because when I was reading it, I really liked it, but I didn't feel compelled to pick it up once I'd put it down.

The biggest reason for this was because this book meanders. I loved the writing and really enjoyed the characters, but sometimes they just dithered and I was impatient for them to get on with it. When they didn't, I'd walk away from the book for a while. So for as much as I did like this book, I think it had pacing problems. I think it could have been shorter. I think some of the dialog and plot choices made it meander more than was necessary.

My more serious problem with this book, though, is I hated the Haimey and Farweather dynamic and just plain didn't get it. I won't give details away other than to say I didn't find Farweather redeeming in the least, and I thought Haimey was far, far too tolerant of the things Farweather did. I also felt like part of why Haimey is so tolerant is because her tolerance made it possible to drag the book out longer. In my opinion, she should have dealt with Farweather once and for all. I get what the book was saying, that the ideas of forgiveness and tolerance and how to live in a civilized society were caught up in the dynamic between Haimey and Farweather, but Farweather was more or less a sociopath, and it's hard for me to have any sympathy for someone like that. Sue me.

Still, I think I'd like to read the next book in the series, though I'll probably take a break and read a bunch of other books first.

jenniferkowash's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Took me a bit to get into the story, but was wonderful after I did

archaeomancer's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional inspiring mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

This book is absolutely incredible, except in the middle where it starts to drag quite a bit, but the ending hits home, and the cleverness and research that has gone into the rest of the book was enough for me to rate it highly!

The author has seemingly researched an endless array of topics; anthropology, psychology, quantum mechanics, linguistics, computer science, sociology, governmental science, it was absolutely incredible. The depth of psychological awareness and group behavior in particular was astounding! Even just in little throwaway sentences there would be just such exquisite scientific facts rolled into their every day lexicon, but not in a way that hit you over the head. It felt like natural speech patterns and educational parameters had evolved in such a way that such things were just commonplace now. I highly enjoyed that. And I really enjoyed the discussions about sense of self and agency, and how it all came together in the end. 

However, the middle portion dragged so much I almost stopped reading. While I'm glad I didn't, and this is slight spoilers but very vague, the main character and another person are in a situation together, and while the main character is trying to take the lead in psychological manipulation, it is patently obvious they will not do well at that and in fact be manipulated themselves. This is fair for this character; she has a history of being extremely receptive to such things and has very few protective boundaries in place to prevent this, despite her best efforts. While I don't think it was out of character, that doesn't mean it wasn't frustrating watching her and this person talk themselves in circles for in-story weeks. It worked for the story and the characters, I just wish it had been a little shorter. 

caterina_1212's review against another edition

Go to review page

Couldn't finish the first chapter. I can't figure out the terminology and the homophone word replacements feel so unnecessary.  Also really dry, and the sentences don't flow together and I can't figure out what I'm supposed to be picturing.

ndmetal's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Plot and setting were great but the prose was not for me. The technobabble was not easy to pick up on, and for a standalone scifi novel, I spent too much time looking up words.

zarhara's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nekopersona's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

being_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

I quit at 30%.  Stream of consciousness character study requires the prose to do a lot of heavy lifting, and I wasn’t feeling it.  The problem with being inside the mind of someone with unresolved trauma, like Haimey, is that thinking is circular and repetitive.  Bear captures that extremely well, but it turns out it’s just as boring to watch as it is to experience.  Add to that Connla and Singer’s flatness, and i just couldn’t go on.  

Loved Machine, the next book in the series.

smallstories's review against another edition

Go to review page

i'm sure this is a lovely book if you aren't a biopsych major but i am and where are you getting the hormones and neurotransmitters, elizabeth? your main character is in a spacesuit on a starvation diet, elizabeth. where are the things to alter neurochemistry coming from.

stellarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The most interesting thing about this book was all the psychology discussions. The plot got a little muddled, but I did in general like the protagonist. There were a few too many small winks at classic literature and "quaint" notions of the societies of the past, but I found it an okay social SF book.