Reviews

Tales by Peter Straub, H.P. Lovecraft

ksjones's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

baries's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

bookishtory2665's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I'm not sure what to write in this review and that's the honest truth. In Lovecraft's fiction, various cults worshipped Cthulhu but out here in the real world, there have been cases of small cults forming based on the mythos. Books have been written in support of the idea that it wasn't just a literary device and one individual actually wrote his own Cult of Cthulhu Bible (and yes, its available for sale on the Internet).

The author, H. P. Lovecraft never earned a living from his fiction and his life was … unusual. Worth reading about if you have the time.

Okay, enough stalling. Here's what I thought.

Lovecraft is wordy and there are terms that had me searching the Internet for a definition. For me, there were two big problems. One, these stories suffered under the weight of the author's style of writing. He writes about the past and makes it abundantly clear that the protagonist has already survived the events recounted. Nothing is left to the imagination and everyone is uniformly horrified, left with a nervous condition or an outright nervous breakdown and its only afterward that you find out about the events. Maybe for some that works but for me, it tended to water down the tension. Make it all less enjoyable. The second thing that bothered me was the author's apparent bias against certain groups of people.

So, some of the stories had interesting plot lines but ultimately, I found this book a chore to finish and for the first time ever, I was actually counting the pages until it would be over.

achillea's review against another edition

Go to review page

Will probably finish at some point but I realised it's going to take me yearssssss to get through it. Picked it up because I had it on my shelf, one if the stories was set for the monthly book club, plus I wanted to see what one of the roots of cosmic horror is like (answer: boring and barely readable, at least as far as my own reading preferences go. Not even gonna bother mentioning all the bigotry)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

splahdown's review against another edition

Go to review page

Just couldn't get over the abhorrent racism. I get that it was written in 1926 but it was a huge turn off for me. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bookishwendy's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

"On the barren shore, and on the lofty ice barrier in the background, myriads of grotesque penguins squawked and flapped their fins..." ~H. P. Lovecraft in At the Mountains of Madness

"Indeed, all that a wonder story can ever be is a vivid picture of a certain type of human mood. The moment it tries to be anything else it becomes cheap, puerile, and unconvincing." ~H. P. Lovecraft in "Notes on Writing Weird Fiction"

I don't consider myself much of a reader of horror or science fiction, but I do appreciate a good, slow-burning, atmospheric story that makes me question reality, sanity, and all of human existence...at least for a little while. At at the same time, I found myself enjoying this as "pulp" in the same way I might enjoy a monster movie out of the 50's (see the first quote above!). This particular Lovecraft story collection served as a perfect introduction to early 20th century "weird fiction", and I liked the way the stories lengthened, matured, and increased in complexity as I worked my way through. The first few stories are short, somewhat confusing and dreamlike. "The Shunned House" was the first story to feel--in that signature Lovecraft style--more or less grounded in reality, while the creepiness slowly accumulates like the fungi in a damp cellar. In At the Mountains of Madness I became fully immersed in the scientific minutiae of a 1930's antarctic expedition (it's like Into Thin Air with monsters, or maybe Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull done right). "Shadow Over Innsmouth" was the most gripping and fast-paced of all the stories complete with a thrilling chase scene. Of course, Lovecraft takes his time getting to the point, so I imagine that what some people will find intriguing (all the pseudo-science and cultish history) others will find dead dull.

Lovecraft's stories are are very internal and cerebral, and as such there is very little human emotion beyond horror and fear: by that I mean his characters seem to have little, if any, interest in human relationships. There are no love interests, the few families mentioned are horribly disturbed (as was Lovecraft's own), but there is a lot of Indiana-Jonsing about in dangerous subterranean abyssi (that's the correct HPL plural, right? :) However, the stories on their own terms are certain to provoke thought and doubt about the mere shadow of reality we humans are capable of perceiving.

trash_reader_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

2.0

There was really only 5 stories in this entire collection that I actually enjoyed. And, no. One of them was NOT The Call of Cthulhu. Most of the stories were boring and were just TELLING you that you are supposed to be scared (i.e. The Call of Cthulhu). The descriptions are so lazy. You can't scare someone just by saying something is "too terrifying for your mind to comprehend." Shut up.

I understand how these could possibly be considered top horror in the time frame they were written in, but the fact that Lovecraft could only get published in obscure pulp magazines should probably be a big hint as to how unpopular his work actually was. And how shitty of a person he was, which definitely didn't help and it does show in his writing.

billyhopscotch's review against another edition

Go to review page

This book was my introduction to Lovecraft. I cannot recommend it highly enough.

pirate_jesus's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I rate it trash. This tome compiles 21 stories, each accompanied by a brief history of its publication, and upon completion I stand firm that none of you who claim to be Lovecraft fans have actually read a damn word. It’s just something cool or goth to portray. Anything resembling a decent story is buried under terrible conventions, laziness, and blatant racism. Most companies outright refused to publish him for lack of quality, many of these stories going to tabloids or being dug-up posthumously. His constant use of the “dear reader” type of first-person narrative gets old, quick, as does the extreme stretch by which he links even the most foreign of tales to his universe by mention of Arkham and/or Miskatonic University... and let me guess, the architecture of this new place will be labeled “cyclopean...” yep, there it is! But the latter are mostly sufferable complaints. I respect the 1920’s attempt at a horror universe, pre Wu-Tang or MCU. What I can’t suffer is the writer’s version of an artist’s mental block for drawing hands. His descriptions are either hidden (indescribably alien; too horrible to recount in detail; your mind couldn’t possibly comprehend the terror; the sight of which has been blacked from memory) or disgustingly overboard (3 large pages of small font used to provide precise three measurement volume dimensions of a tentacle on a tentacle on a tentacle on a tentacle on a star shaped head, plus the appendages on each and where exactly they fall on the color wheel. No eyes though). #readingrainbow #bigdumb #toomanyknuckles #yourewrong #okiknowtwopeoplewhoactuallyenjoylovecraft

onemoremolly's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced

5.0