Scan barcode
izzyw's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
1.5
paulcowdell's review against another edition
3.0
A day after finishing I might be revising my rating - not a vast amount (3.5, say), but for a not altogether satisfying book it's still with me. I didn't like it as much as Wieland, but there's definitely something here. (And it isn't just the absolutely excellent character name Clithero Edny).
One of the most pleasing things in Brockden Brown is his determination to forge a distinctly American Gothic. He cheats slightly in one of the story strands, which has some rather Italian-sounding rooms in Dublin, but the attempt to supplant mittelEuropäische landscape grandeur with American deserts and mountains is intriguing.
Brockden Brown was also determinedly opposed to the supernaturalism of Gothic fiction, so here (as in Wieland) there's a rationalist argument that somewhat undermines the mood he's aiming to create, even though that also leads to the elaborate description of one character's motivations and story being deflated rather abruptly.
Mostly, though, I liked it precisely because it just doesn't quite hang together: one story is wrapped up in such a way as to make it almost a McGuffin, which is intriguing, there are teasing plot lacunae which he doesn't really resolve well (the resolution works, it's just not very good) ...
I like the gaps in it, to be honest, but they're not going to appeal to everyone.
One of the most pleasing things in Brockden Brown is his determination to forge a distinctly American Gothic. He cheats slightly in one of the story strands, which has some rather Italian-sounding rooms in Dublin, but the attempt to supplant mittelEuropäische landscape grandeur with American deserts and mountains is intriguing.
Brockden Brown was also determinedly opposed to the supernaturalism of Gothic fiction, so here (as in Wieland) there's a rationalist argument that somewhat undermines the mood he's aiming to create, even though that also leads to the elaborate description of one character's motivations and story being deflated rather abruptly.
Mostly, though, I liked it precisely because it just doesn't quite hang together: one story is wrapped up in such a way as to make it almost a McGuffin, which is intriguing, there are teasing plot lacunae which he doesn't really resolve well (the resolution works, it's just not very good) ...
I like the gaps in it, to be honest, but they're not going to appeal to everyone.
katy7648's review against another edition
3.0
i think this is arguably one of the most batshit insane books i’ve ever read, and it’s only because of the last quarter or so of the book. i read it for an american lit class.
adunnells's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
eab7680's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
tiniestmite's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
1.0
thesydda's review against another edition
4.0
I loved it! It does take some getting used to the writing style, but is totally worth it. I had to write a conference paper on it, and the argument I made, that Edgar had multiple personalities, certainly made the story more interesting.
Outside of an English class, I'm not certain how successful this story would be.
Outside of an English class, I'm not certain how successful this story would be.
sobertyger's review against another edition
3.0
An early entry into American gothic (published in 1799), Edgar Huntly or Memoirs of a Sleep-Walker is a strange and interesting read but could have benefited from extensive editing. I liked the story, but I was frequently confused by who was speaking and what exactly was going on.
verkisto's review against another edition
2.0
I added this book to my to-read list after reading The Monk, and seeing it mentioned in the foreword as another example of a Gothic novel. So, of course, I expected it to be, you know, Gothic. Instead, what I found was a book that had some Gothic leanings, but was mostly long-winded and rambling and took a long time to get to the point. I suppose I should grant it some leeway, since it was published in 1799, but The Monk was published just three years earlier, got to the point faster, and was a much easier read.
This book contains some of the most stilted language I've ever read.
In other words, "Dude, she doesn't like you." Again, yes, this is from 1799, not 2016, but again, The Monk didn't read like this. Did this guy get paid by the word or something?
The novel starts out with the narrator, Edgar, explaining who he is. Interminably. Then we get the next section, where he confronts the guy he saw digging under the tree, named Clithero.
(Vulgar side note: I kept reading this character's name with the break between the T and the H. It was ... somewhat distracting.)
In the next section, we get another interminable description of who Clithero is. Then we get some adventure, as Edgar pursues Clithero into a cave on one of his sleepwalking jaunts. There's some back-and-forth throughout, as Edgar has to keep returning home, and later Edgar finds himself in the caves, lost, in the darkness, and starving. The story picks up, and it's easier to manage Brown's melodramatic narrative, which takes us through to the end of the novel.
The thing is, between the time when he follows Clithero into the caves, and later finds himself lost in the same caves, he runs across a guy named Weymouth who says that Waldegrave was holding money for him. He has no proof of any of his claims, though the evidence supports it, and Edgar believes him.and wants to give him the money. I get the feeling Brown is trying to show Edgar as a generous, honorable character, but the interaction is random, and doesn't serve the story at all.
There are some redeeming features of the story: Edgar is an unreliable narrator, which adds a layer of interest; Native Americans are referred to by Edgar as "savages", when Edgar is the one who kills them; and it seems to be a parallel to life in early America after the Revolutionary War. Unfortunately, the novel is a bit of a chore to read, it repeats itself quite a bit, and it takes too long to get going. It's certainly a book that's better suited for analysis than entertainment, which makes it an odd book to recommend to a casual reader. While I don't mind stories that engender analysis, what I look for in a novel above all is story, and the one in Edgar Huntly isn't sufficient enough to entertain.
This book contains some of the most stilted language I've ever read.
It was natural to suggest to my friend, when expatiating on this theme, an inquiry as to how far subsequent events had obliterated the impressions that were then made, and as to the plausibility of reviving, at this more auspicious period, his claims on the heart of his friend.
In other words, "Dude, she doesn't like you." Again, yes, this is from 1799, not 2016, but again, The Monk didn't read like this. Did this guy get paid by the word or something?
The novel starts out with the narrator, Edgar, explaining who he is. Interminably. Then we get the next section, where he confronts the guy he saw digging under the tree, named Clithero.
(Vulgar side note: I kept reading this character's name with the break between the T and the H. It was ... somewhat distracting.)
In the next section, we get another interminable description of who Clithero is. Then we get some adventure, as Edgar pursues Clithero into a cave on one of his sleepwalking jaunts. There's some back-and-forth throughout, as Edgar has to keep returning home, and later Edgar finds himself in the caves, lost, in the darkness, and starving. The story picks up, and it's easier to manage Brown's melodramatic narrative, which takes us through to the end of the novel.
The thing is, between the time when he follows Clithero into the caves, and later finds himself lost in the same caves, he runs across a guy named Weymouth who says that Waldegrave was holding money for him. He has no proof of any of his claims, though the evidence supports it, and Edgar believes him.and wants to give him the money. I get the feeling Brown is trying to show Edgar as a generous, honorable character, but the interaction is random, and doesn't serve the story at all.
There are some redeeming features of the story: Edgar is an unreliable narrator, which adds a layer of interest; Native Americans are referred to by Edgar as "savages", when Edgar is the one who kills them; and it seems to be a parallel to life in early America after the Revolutionary War. Unfortunately, the novel is a bit of a chore to read, it repeats itself quite a bit, and it takes too long to get going. It's certainly a book that's better suited for analysis than entertainment, which makes it an odd book to recommend to a casual reader. While I don't mind stories that engender analysis, what I look for in a novel above all is story, and the one in Edgar Huntly isn't sufficient enough to entertain.
eviltidings's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
funny
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0