Reviews with content warning for Sexual content - Double Pucked

Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

Double Pucked by Lauren Blakely

35 reviews

havenotreadinyears's review

Go to review page

funny lighthearted relaxing fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Content Warnings

carsons1996's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted relaxing medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

The flow of the storyline was very natural and made it easy to read quickly. The amount of spice to plot ratio was very balanced and thw characters felt very real. Some of the dialogue was a little simple but it got the job done! Highly recommended why choose read!

Content Warnings

cadyly's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

I didn't enjoy this book as much as I've enjoyed Lauren Blakely's other books. This was my first MFM, and to be honest, I had to look up what MFM meant. Basically, it's about a throuple consisting of two men and a woman. It wasn't a situation that I was particularly interested in, which is why the star rating for me is a 2.0 - it's ok, but not really my jam. While I typically enjoy the author's writing, I felt that this story lacked a good plot line and was basically a foil for a series of explicit sex scenes, which were very detailed. In the end of the book, it very quickly glossed over them "coming out" to their family, friends, and the general public, and I felt that this could have been explored better. The gist was that friends and family were immediately accepting; as for the public/media, there will always be trolls and people who disagree but they just ignored any negativity. I think the relationship between the guys and jealousies could have been explored more than just "both of us want to share her," but again, I feel that this was just a tool for explicit scenes vs. a real investigation of the relationship dynamics.

Content Warnings

allthecoolkidsread's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

I should really start reading plots before I commit to reading a book. But well... it was a quick read at least

Content Warnings

wildatheart1339's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Content Warnings

tuckertl's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny fast-paced

Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No

3.0

Content Warnings

mysticserenity's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative inspiring medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

ermunleybooks's review

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

rebakesl's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

This was a spicy and fun, albeit shallow read. It was a good palate cleanser, and I don’t think it was trying to be anything other than a feel-good junk food read. My primary annoyance was the author’s overuse of what I would consider incorrect colloquialisms (ie “home in” instead of “hone in”— which I now know is also used after looking it up, but since it was used several times in a short span, I found it irritating).

Content Warnings

a_eli's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Content Warnings

More...