books_are_magical's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective sad tense slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

annatha_belle's review

Go to review page

inspiring reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tatumm's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

royalmilktea's review

Go to review page

informative reflective fast-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

builtonbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative inspiring reflective sad medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

astrid421's review

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cass_lit's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

There is a certain category of nonfiction that doesn’t work for me. This started off like that and I was worried. 

I had no idea where this was going for most of this book. It seemed in the beginning like a stream of consciousness about “chaos” as the author worked through some thoughts on dependency (her dad, her ~curly haired~ ex-boyfriend). (All of her thoughts there are totally valid, I just don’t get a lot of enjoyment out of reading them.) I did not understand her obsession with David Starr Jordan at first, but then she started telling us all of the shitty things he did and I REALLY did not understand why he deserved a book that wasn’t focused on setting his reputation straight. When someone uses his power to cover sexual assault with threats and potentially murders someone (and definitely gaslights the hell out of her after her death), I’m simply not interested in the psychology behind why he did it. He did it and he was wrong. In my opinion, the author’s desperation to find out why Jordan was like this felt like she was trying to find an excuse for him. 

The last ~1/4 or so of the book truly saved it for me. Miller felt like she was unequivocally calling Jordan a bad person, and she even got a little vindictive - deservedly. The threads of the story finally started to make some sense and I could find a point to why she wrote this. I am in awe of Anna and Mary’s strength for getting through what they did; they’re a great model of what women (and all humans!) can be, no matter what depraved narcissists have said. I also didn’t know that “fish” wasn’t considered a scientific classification any longer, so it was equally as interesting as it was satisfying.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

imstephtacular's review

Go to review page

challenging informative mysterious reflective sad medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emilily's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced

5.0

Wow... this is one of those books that cannot be described in a way that does it justice. 

On the surface, this book may seem like it's about David Starr Jordan, and his dark legacy as an ichthyologist-turned-eugenicist (and maybe also murderer?). But in truth, it is so much more. This book is about human knowledge, its limitations, and the evolution of how we understand the world around us. With traces of philosophy, memoir, nature writing, historical critique, and sociology,  there is something in this beautifully hopeful book for everyone. And yes, it will make you reconsider if fish actually exist (I have been converted to believing they don't).

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

avrowland96's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny hopeful informative medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings