Reviews

Tout ce qu'on ne s'est jamais dit by Celeste Ng

dearreader_booktok's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

the_readingkoala's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

msmagoo502's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful reflective sad
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

faeriesparks's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Wow, this was a phenomenal book.
It's a quite short book which took me almost a month to read but right from the beginning I realised I wanted to take my time with this story. When I wasn't reading it, I found myself thinking about these characters throughout the day.
Everything I Never Told You was so interesting - with the 70s setting, the Chinese-American family, their struggles, the circumstances of some family members. Loved it and definitely recommend this!

klhammy's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Really enjoyed the story and plot, but found that I wasn't very attached to any of the characters.

noriam_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This is what we call "showing instead of telling" I loved it.

gelination's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character

4.5

sabsfil's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

slentz97's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.75

Could be artificially low because I listened to audiobook on a long car drive. Maybe would have liked it better if I read it and not all at once

carlyxdeexx's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I guess my love for Celeste Ng has been confirmed. This book feels more micro than LITTLE FIRES EVERYWHERE, but both books share some key similarities: starting from a central event near the end, exploring familial complexities and discomforts and how people are shaped by them, jumping between third-person limited perspectives of each character. In both books, we’re given a simple tragedy, like a single line on a page, and then we are gradually provided with the nuance surrounding the tragedy, the many other lines and shading that form a large, hyperrealistic sketch.

I will agree with some of the other reviewers who mention the book’s downward spiraling, its saddening and maddening trajectory. It can be difficult to read, seeing the signs coming together, desperately wanting the characters to talk candidly with each other, knowing they can’t or won’t for some reason or another, which is always how that works. I was surprised at the small burst of hope in the ending, the hope that comes with time and patience and the careful peeling away of layers. Is that a spoiler? I dunno. Better safe than sorry I guess.

I hope to see more novels by Ng, or a short story collection—I noticed she has some short stories under her belt. Her writing is compelling, poetic, lucid, and I love how deeply rooted her work is in the personal and in relationships.