madoko's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

2500 year old toilet humor

patixclusive's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

S E T T E X T S S U C K. P E R I O D.

rakhas's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective fast-paced

2.5

emmyawards's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

2.75

saralasara's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny fast-paced

3.0

saramaryy's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

cinaedussinister's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is not my favourite play by Aristophanes, which is a shame, because I was expecting it to be what The Frogs ended up being instead: a witty critique of the philosophical debates (which essentially amounted to petty schoolchild arguments) of his day. Really, I do find it disappointing that the character of Socrates (Socrates!) is so mediocre here. Now, when I say mediocre, I in no way am saying this in reference to all comedy ever made, otherwise this would be at least four stars. What I am saying is that, with Aristophanes’ talent and a character with so much potential as Socrates, I did expect better. To reiterate, that does not mean that this is a bad play. Not at all; this play is miles better than a surprising amount of comedy by other writers (yes, including Shakespeare), it’s just that my standards for a play written by Aristophanes are very high, and this play does not reach those standards.

maaikemieke's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Klassieke billenkletser met een misverstand. Het zou F.C. De Kampioenen kunnen zijn, maar dan één van de laatste seizoenen m.i.

luds's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

saraf7990's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0