Scan barcode
fetterov's review against another edition
Need to do this one in print rather than audio
rgesme's review
challenging
informative
reflective
slow-paced
4.5
Clark demonstrates the complexity involved in the First World War with a thematic focus narrative. Not for the faint hearted as it delves deep into specific historical actors, events, and moments in time.
josemoya's review against another edition
dark
informative
reflective
slow-paced
5.0
¿Cómo se llegó al Armagedón de 1914? Tradicionalmente se ha buscado culpables con la pistola humeante en la mano, pero este libro nos muestra que, como en las obras de Agatha Christie, todos los personajes tienen su parte de culpa. Conscientes del peligro de una guerra total, confiaban en que la amenaza de sus alianzas defensivas fuera suficiente para mantener la paz. La opacidad del sistema y la falta de un organismo realmente independiente donde dilucidar sus disputas hicieron el resto.
"Los protagonistas de 1914 eran como sonámbulos, vigilantes pero ciegos, angustiados por los sueños, pero inconscientes ante la realidad del horror que estaban a punto de traer al mundo."
El libro narra los sucesos aunando el vertiginoso ritmo de las novelas con el cuerpo crítico propio de una monografía científica.
"Los protagonistas de 1914 eran como sonámbulos, vigilantes pero ciegos, angustiados por los sueños, pero inconscientes ante la realidad del horror que estaban a punto de traer al mundo."
El libro narra los sucesos aunando el vertiginoso ritmo de las novelas con el cuerpo crítico propio de una monografía científica.
susanhecht's review against another edition
5.0
It look me months to get all the way through this book, because it wanted to read it carefully, and I found it very rewarding.
The overall thrust of the book is that the outbreak of WWI was not inevitable, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Josef was not merely a pretext for a war everybody (*cough* Germany) wanted to happen. Clark takes Serbian nationalism and irrendentism very seriously, and thinks that Austria-Hungary was probably right to want to punish the Serbs over the assassination. But the Great Powers of Europe, in an era of strengthening alliances (esp. the one between France and Russia), military buildup, and hawkish leadership (all of which were fairly recent occurrences and may well have waned over the next few years) decided it was worth going to war over.
The book goes deep into the weeds of the various people who were involved in decision making in the UK, France, Russia, Germany, Serbia, and Austria-Hungry, a cast of characters (monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, Foreign Ministers, War Ministers, etc.) that changed over the last couple of decades before 1914. There are lots of arguments about colonies and borders within Europe (esp. in the Balkans) which contribute to the conditions of 1914, as well as power struggles inside each country. Laying out these struggles takes a lot of pages, and serves the overall argument that assigning blame for the war's outbreak to any one country or person doesn't make sense--there were a lot of moving parts that could have moved a different direction.
The overall thrust of the book is that the outbreak of WWI was not inevitable, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Josef was not merely a pretext for a war everybody (*cough* Germany) wanted to happen. Clark takes Serbian nationalism and irrendentism very seriously, and thinks that Austria-Hungary was probably right to want to punish the Serbs over the assassination. But the Great Powers of Europe, in an era of strengthening alliances (esp. the one between France and Russia), military buildup, and hawkish leadership (all of which were fairly recent occurrences and may well have waned over the next few years) decided it was worth going to war over.
The book goes deep into the weeds of the various people who were involved in decision making in the UK, France, Russia, Germany, Serbia, and Austria-Hungry, a cast of characters (monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, Foreign Ministers, War Ministers, etc.) that changed over the last couple of decades before 1914. There are lots of arguments about colonies and borders within Europe (esp. in the Balkans) which contribute to the conditions of 1914, as well as power struggles inside each country. Laying out these struggles takes a lot of pages, and serves the overall argument that assigning blame for the war's outbreak to any one country or person doesn't make sense--there were a lot of moving parts that could have moved a different direction.
crowningtesla's review against another edition
Really comprehensive, but the writing is too dry for me. I'm not gonna force myself to read 700 more pages
fox_noises's review against another edition
Too dense and slow paced, I have other library books to read.
oisincleere's review against another edition
challenging
dark
informative
reflective
sad
slow-paced
4.0