Reviews

The Midnight Palace by Carlos Ruiz Zafón

anakuyenhn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Este libro está ambientado en Calcuta de 1932, lo cual me gustó mucho, pues nunca había leído un libro ambientado en ese sitio. Nos cuenta la historia de Ben y Sheere, dos hermanos marcados por un pasado terrible que desconocen y los llevará a vivir una tragedia. En conjunto son sus amigos de la Chowbar Society buscaran encontrar un salida a la muerte que los acecha.

Esta historia está llena de misterio, donde hay mucho fuego, trenes, espíritus malignos y hasta una sociedad secreta, todo perfectamente hilado y contado con la maestría de las letras de Carlos Ruiz Zafón. Me parece que es un libro realmente excepcional, que puede llegar a mantenerte en suspenso durante toda la historia. Tiene una narrativa atrapante y maravillosa.

Si hay algo que puedo criticar de esta historia es el ritmo que tiene. El final me pareció muy apresurado para el tiempo que se tomo ir desarrollando la historia en un principio, sentí como que al final todo lo que estuvimos esperando durante muchas páginas se reveló en unas pocas, dejando la sensación de que algo no estaba bien y que era muy apresurado.

Reseña Completa: https://anakuyenhn.wordpress.com/2018/02/11/resena-el-palacio-de-la-medianoche-carlos-ruiz-zafon/

bookishagata's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

3,5/5⭐️

megstro's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Incredibly rushed. I understand that it's marketed toward a slightly younger crowd than the other Ruiz Zafon works I'd read. But there was so much unexplained, as if the reader is supposed to inherently understand what's not being said.

m_bbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

marlisphillips's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

zafón's writing is excellent as always. This just wasn't my kind of book. There were supernatural things going on that I just can't get into.

liaishiding's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

logolepsy_e's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Gli elementi tipici di Zafòn ci sono già tutti in questo libro, solo che si presentano ancora un modo molto grezzo e abbozzato.
La storia è impregnata di mistero, si sentono sottilmente angoscia e paura, e la narrazione serrata trascina il lettore nell'avventura.
Il romanzo rimane però di poco spessore, diciamo che risulta un racconto piacevole ma povero. I personaggi sono poco approfonditi, la narrazione si trascina senza intoppi ma fin troppo velocemente, il mistero non è abbastanza e la risoluzione finale è fin troppo semplicisticamente lasciata andare.
Se avessi letto questo romanzo prima de "L'Ombra del vento", dubito che avrei continuato ad esplorare le opere di questo autore.
Però il racconto non è da cestinare: regala comunque una lettura scorrevolissima e piacevole.

12dejamoo's review

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

Disappointing because I normally love Zafón so much. Maybe his adult books are just where it’s at and the young adult fall a bit flat. Anyway it does have that signature maziness and magical realism which I do love. I liked the setting but I missed the Barcelona of the Cemetery of Forgotten Books a lot more.

I didn’t really like any of the characters that much. Well maybe apart from Michael. I think it was really Ben that I didn’t like. It’s not always a necessity that readers love characters but I couldn’t tell if the book wanted us to like Ben or not. Ian insists they’re best friends but he actually seems aloof and too wrapped up in his own intelligence to actually be a good friend. Perhaps also there are too many characters introduced all at once to the point that you don’t feel you really know any of them.

The plot seemed classic Zafón and I did enjoy it. If it had been an adult book it would have had more depth but there was definitely something there. It was a bit frustrating that we acted for so long on one assumption and then things changed abruptly. I think the discovery and research could have been more natural.

Whilst I didn’t enjoy this all that much, it has had the effect of making me want to read another adult Zafón, so maybe it’s not all bad.

Also final note this book is weirdly similar to The Sibius Knot, which I don’t recommend but I wonder if that author was inspired by Zafón.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gosska's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3,5

christel_booksmart's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Struggling between a three and a four. I guess my real rating is a 3.5 I cannot understand how this book is considered part of a series along with The Prince of Mist. Where The Prince of Mist was clearly a book aimed at young teens, The Midnight Palace utilised more sophisticated language and a more adult theme. The two books neither share similar characters or a similar storyline, so that's my first "beef" with this series. This story was very interesting, the characters were well-developed; it's easy to see the Zafon that wrote the incredible The Shadow of the Wind within the pages of this story. But unlike TSOTW, in which everything tied together at the end, this book had a few remaining loose ends. For example, what was the deal with the picture the character Michael drew of the 6 friends standing near a lake? Its significance is never established, yet its apparent importance is emphasised. I also did not understand the ending, which I won't mention explicitly because it will spoil the story. Unlike books like Harry Potter for example, in which the nemesis of the story is defeated in intricate detail, I feel The Midnight Palace (and, as a side note, The a Prince of Mist) had "fuzzy" endings- i.e. It wasn't clear exactly how the bad guy was destroyed. I feel like the story was sort of unfinished in many ways, and the details not properly explained in others.

I think if I had TPOM or TMP first, I probably never would have read The Shadow of the Wind, because I feel these two books pale in comparison to its brilliance. I'm very thankful I read TSOTW first, because that book is one that will stay with me forever, and it would be a tragedy to have never read it. Don't misunderstand me, these other two books by Zafon are good reads, with great stories and intriguing, well-developed characters, but there are few annoying little details that spoil what could easily be 5 star books. If you've read these two and were disappointed, don't let that deter you from reading the truly remarkable story that is The Shadow of the Wind.