Scan barcode
nickoliver's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Temporarily, I've lowered the rating from my original 4 stars to 3.75, because unfortunately, upon re-reading it, I haven't enjoyed it the same way anymore? But I'm not sure what I do want to rate it, but 3.75 stars sounds reasonable, so it'll stay this way for now.
Anyways, the reasons why I didn't have quite the same joy reading this book that I had back in 2018 were:
1. I didn't really like the characters. Josh was mean (I know it was said that he was actually just ~shy~, but personally, that doesn't really excuse treating other people like shit and making them scared to come to work and talk to you) and oftentimes just ignored what Lucy wanted, and his jealousy really got on my freaking nerves. Like, the way he acted around Danny drove me insane. And Lucy's horniness made me honestly just exhausted. I'm a sex-indifferent asexual, so I'm usually completely fine with people being horny (even if I can't fathom feeling that way myself), but her attitude reminded me of that time period in my life when I thought I was sex-repulsed, and overly horny people made me want to bash my head in with a tire iron. Go to horny jail, Lucy.
2. I didn't enjoy the romance as much as I thought I would. I didn't like the way both Lucy and Josh treated Danny and used him, and especially the beginning of the relationship just ... didn't sit right with me. Josh didn't apologise for his shitty behaviour until literally the end, and while I'm glad they got that out of the way, I wished that happened sooner. Lucy basically just let Josh treat her kind of badly (he wasn't abusive per se, but very dismissive and cruel at times) and accepted it because of her own feelings or him. In turn, she objectified the crap out of Josh, even after she learnt that a lot of his exes were only with him because of his looks and didn't actually like his personality.
3. Lucy, for some reason, seemed to come to the same conclusions several times? Like, there were two separate times when she realised that Josh didn't actually hate her. I found that a bit annoying and repetitive. It stalled the plot sometimes, which always confused me, because I thought we'd already been over that at that point.
4. Speaking of repetitiveness, the way Thorne hammered home that Lucy and Josh were obsessed with each other's eyes was way too much.
5. The book was focusing a lot on masculinity, and calling things masculine that weren't actually inherently so, and using feminine as an almost negative descriptor? Coming from Lucy, it was just weird. If it came from Josh, I'd just assume he had a fragile masculinity and was afraid to be seen as anything but, but since everything was in Lucy's POV, it was just ... weird.
6. The hetero- and allonormativity of it all made me tired. Like, no, Thorne, not every single woman who has and will ever meet Josh will want to climb him like a tree. And no, just because two people had dated for a year doesn't automatically mean they'd had sex. And why do straight people always act like cavemen the moment their crush or significant other has someone from the opposite sex obviously fawning over them?
7. I know Mr. Bexley wasn't exactly the best person, but you can talk about what a useless CEO he is without constantly making fun of his weight and that he likes to eat. Like, maybe concentrate on how creepy and gross he was for constantly looking down Lucy's shirt, which was the way bigger issue in my opinion.
What I did enjoy, however, was Thorne's writing. It felt really out of control, and she phrased things in a way that both fit Lucy's personality perfectly and sometimes made me laugh incredulously, just because they gave me really funny visuals. I also didn't mind the smut (though I would've preferred a bit more of it if it meant I got a bit less of horny Lucy). There were definitely a lot of funny scenes that made me crack up, though I think it wasn't quite as many as on my first read.
Anyways, the reasons why I didn't have quite the same joy reading this book that I had back in 2018 were:
1. I didn't really like the characters. Josh was mean (I know it was said that he was actually just ~shy~, but personally, that doesn't really excuse treating other people like shit and making them scared to come to work and talk to you) and oftentimes just ignored what Lucy wanted, and his jealousy really got on my freaking nerves. Like, the way he acted around Danny drove me insane. And Lucy's horniness made me honestly just exhausted. I'm a sex-indifferent asexual, so I'm usually completely fine with people being horny (even if I can't fathom feeling that way myself), but her attitude reminded me of that time period in my life when I thought I was sex-repulsed, and overly horny people made me want to bash my head in with a tire iron. Go to horny jail, Lucy.
2. I didn't enjoy the romance as much as I thought I would. I didn't like the way both Lucy and Josh treated Danny and used him, and especially the beginning of the relationship just ... didn't sit right with me. Josh didn't apologise for his shitty behaviour until literally the end, and while I'm glad they got that out of the way, I wished that happened sooner. Lucy basically just let Josh treat her kind of badly (he wasn't abusive per se, but very dismissive and cruel at times) and accepted it because of her own feelings or him. In turn, she objectified the crap out of Josh, even after she learnt that a lot of his exes were only with him because of his looks and didn't actually like his personality.
3. Lucy, for some reason, seemed to come to the same conclusions several times? Like, there were two separate times when she realised that Josh didn't actually hate her. I found that a bit annoying and repetitive. It stalled the plot sometimes, which always confused me, because I thought we'd already been over that at that point.
4. Speaking of repetitiveness, the way Thorne hammered home that Lucy and Josh were obsessed with each other's eyes was way too much.
5. The book was focusing a lot on masculinity, and calling things masculine that weren't actually inherently so, and using feminine as an almost negative descriptor? Coming from Lucy, it was just weird. If it came from Josh, I'd just assume he had a fragile masculinity and was afraid to be seen as anything but, but since everything was in Lucy's POV, it was just ... weird.
6. The hetero- and allonormativity of it all made me tired. Like, no, Thorne, not every single woman who has and will ever meet Josh will want to climb him like a tree. And no, just because two people had dated for a year doesn't automatically mean they'd had sex. And why do straight people always act like cavemen the moment their crush or significant other has someone from the opposite sex obviously fawning over them?
7. I know Mr. Bexley wasn't exactly the best person, but you can talk about what a useless CEO he is without constantly making fun of his weight and that he likes to eat. Like, maybe concentrate on how creepy and gross he was for constantly looking down Lucy's shirt, which was the way bigger issue in my opinion.
What I did enjoy, however, was Thorne's writing. It felt really out of control, and she phrased things in a way that both fit Lucy's personality perfectly and sometimes made me laugh incredulously, just because they gave me really funny visuals. I also didn't mind the smut (though I would've preferred a bit more of it if it meant I got a bit less of horny Lucy). There were definitely a lot of funny scenes that made me crack up, though I think it wasn't quite as many as on my first read.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Sexual content, Fatphobia, and Vomit
Minor: Alcohol, Acephobia/Arophobia, and Body shaming
More...