Scan barcode
madamenovelist's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Rape, Sexual assault, Toxic relationship, Suicidal thoughts, Homophobia, Hate crime, Torture, War, Panic attacks/disorders, Murder, Blood, Lesbophobia, Pedophilia, Dysphoria, Deadnaming, Confinement, Body horror, Medical content, Injury/Injury detail, Gaslighting, Emotional abuse, Death of parent, Forced institutionalization, Medical trauma, Transphobia, Sexual violence, Grief, Gore, Child death, Misogyny, Pregnancy, Sexual content, Abortion, Ableism, Death, Violence, Sexual harassment, Physical abuse, Mental illness, Domestic abuse, and Child abuse
Sexual abuse of minors is a theme throughout this book. All the topics are very heavy but sexual abuse and gore are very prominent.reinynights's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Child death, Medical trauma, Injury/Injury detail, Child abuse, Deadnaming, Misogyny, Adult/minor relationship, Medical content, Ableism, Blood, Body horror, Violence, Gore, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Dysphoria, and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Child abuse, Transphobia, Sexual violence, Sexism, Murder, Violence, Sexual assault, and Pregnancy
Minor: Death of parent
infinite_helix's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
The desperation and fear is palpable, and I could not put this down. I would get so sucked in the world around me fell away and got replaced by the cold, dark, clinical and cruel halls of Braxton. I was cringing from phantom pains, recoiling in disgust, clenching the book in fervor.
And yet, somehow, in all the horror, I had such intense joy and satisfaction. This is the second book I've read with an explicitly autistic protagonist, and there was SO MUCH of my experiences and feelings in Silas that it was heartbreaking and cathartic in turn.
The way Silas crumples to the ground, overwhelmed and screaming and crying, upon realizing Daphne is there and real and his mirror and an ally and safe port in this madness was how I felt reading this book. Andrew Joseph White dug his authorial fingers into the brackish and bloody part of my soul with this book.
It was painful and perfect.
Graphic: Child death, Gore, Child abuse, Sexism, Suicidal thoughts, Body horror, Abortion, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, Misogyny, Confinement, Dysphoria, Emotional abuse, Blood, Medical trauma, Murder, Transphobia, Violence, Gaslighting, Bullying, Death, and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Deadnaming, Domestic abuse, and Sexual assault
This book does not hold back on the horrors committed willfully and frequently to those deemed 'other' in Victorian England. It also doesn't shy away from what those surviving under such violent oppression will do to themselves and others to continue to survive or escape.thyme_james's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Moderate: Sexual violence, Pregnancy, Physical abuse, Transphobia, Forced institutionalization, Rape, Misogyny, Murder, Emotional abuse, and Dysphoria
athlen_47_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Murder, Abortion, Body shaming, Dysphoria, Gore, Physical abuse, Transphobia, Bullying, Deadnaming, Outing, Sexism, Vomit, Ableism, Blood, Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Medical content, Misogyny, Self harm, Torture, Violence, Mental illness, Forced institutionalization, Suicidal thoughts, Grief, Death, Injury/Injury detail, and Suicide attempt
Moderate: Rape
snleck's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Miscarriage, Dysphoria, Body horror, Sexual violence, Sexual harassment, Sexism, Pregnancy, Murder, Misogyny, Hate crime, Transphobia, Suicide, Sexual assault, Rape, Adult/minor relationship, Violence, Physical abuse, Outing, Mental illness, Medical trauma, Medical content, Deadnaming, Bullying, Body shaming, Death of parent, Death, Confinement, Child death, Blood, Torture, Self harm, Lesbophobia, Injury/Injury detail, Homophobia, Gore, Forced institutionalization, Emotional abuse, and Abortion
queersubtext's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Abortion, Blood, Medical content, Injury/Injury detail, Gaslighting, Gore, Transphobia, Murder, Medical trauma, Misogyny, Violence, Self harm, Forced institutionalization, and Emotional abuse
Moderate: Torture, Sexual assault, Body shaming, Pregnancy, Outing, Dysphoria, Adult/minor relationship, Sexual harassment, Child abuse, and Domestic abuse
Minor: Pedophilia and Miscarriage
annachronistic's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Misogyny, Medical trauma, Medical content, Dysphoria, Ableism, Transphobia, Forced institutionalization, Murder, Death, Blood, Gaslighting, Pregnancy, Sexual assault, Abortion, Deadnaming, and Domestic abuse
chamomiledaydreams's review against another edition
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
"TSBIT" explores transness and autism in a different way than "HFWU," and I think that's wonderful. Both novels are similar in tone and style (sharing the theme of "trans kids biting back"), but unique in content and imagery, with very different settings (post-apocalyptic America, versus nineteenth century England). I especially enjoyed the way that Silas' anxiety manifests in a figurative rabbit inside of his chest. That ongoing metaphor culminates very nicely in the finale, and it's one of many personality traits that distinguishes Silas from Benji.
The weakest point in this book, for me, is the worldbuilding. AJW mentions in a video of his that he doesn't feel equipped to write in more detail about what a revolution against Speaker society would look like, and he adds lightheartedly that his worldbuilding probably wouldn't withstand such a heightened level of scrutiny anyway. I agree with this.
The fantasy elements added to nineteenth century England allow for 1) frequent eye imagery and eye-related horror; 2) characters to recognize others with spiritual powers; and 3) dramatic parallels of how colonialism and misogyny operate in the real world. I enjoyed a lot of these fantasy elements. Eye imagery is neat, and I appreciate the concept of vengeful spirits wreaking havoc on their oppressors in death. The line where the ghosts say that their privileged abusers never thought they'd end up in the ground like their victims was bone-chilling and, quite frankly, awesome.
But there's still so much that I don't understand about how the Speaker system works. Silas isn't allowed to pierce the Veil, and he doesn't seem very interested in trying, so it makes sense that our protagonist doesn't give us much insight into these fantasy powers. We hear allusions to how Speakers use ghosts to gain intel, especially during military campaigns. But I understand very little about the afterlife, which is surprising, considering how every unique fantasy element in this story revolves around the dead.
Is the Veil a kind of purgatory where spirits are trapped? Do any spirits get to "move on" to someplace better? Are they miserable in death? And if the afterlife is a freezing cold hellish landscape (which it certainly seems to be), then why aren't more Speakers and those with supernatural abilities concerned about it? The explanation could be that the men in power often think that death will never happen to them, but I don't think this is a satisfying answer for how all of a fictional society seems to ignore the horrific implications of their powers.
Then, there's the detail that these powers miraculously appeared several decades ago. I wonder if there's some parallel that I'm missing in the real world, some revolution or change in society that is represented by purple eyes and ghost powers. Industrialization, perhaps, or the age of empires?
Still, what's trickiest for me to reckon with is the decision to denote ghost powers with purple eyes. I imagine that AJW wanted an unnatural eye color to reflect the characters' supernatural abilities. But as someone with ocular albinism, I know very well that purple eyes are possible, and they have a clear scientific explanation. (If you lack enough pigmentation in your irises, then you can see the red color of the blood vessels beneath: hence the prevalence of red and purple-tinted eyes among people with albinism.) I can tell myself that the purple eyes in this novel are more jewel-toned and fantastical than real purple eyes, and perhaps with more range and variety, but I can't fully get over the odd correlation of eye color with magic, especially considering the harmful stereotype of PWA as mystical or otherworldly.
There was a moment in this novel where Silas reiterates that there is nothing special about purple eyes; they are no different from any other eyes. While this is true in one sense, there is a tangible difference in pigmentation that has a clear scientific explanation (and a very interesting one at that, in my opinion). I wish that that portion had been worded differently, to emphasize that purple eyes are different from other eye colors, but not inherently magically. Still, I don't know if that's correct in this universe, since there is a 1:1 correlation of purple eyes and magic powers that I quite honestly don't know what to do with.
How many people actually have this eye color in the novel, by the way? What percentage of the human population has inexplicable ghost powers, and did these powers suddenly awaken in adults, or only in newborns? I accept that Silas is able to go into hiding, because I want that for him. But just how much do his eyes stand out, even once he's left his old identity behind and can safely pass as a man?
There are a few topics I'm very picky about when it comes to fiction: depictions of albinism, aromanticism, asexuality, and romance itself. My thoughts about eyes in this novel, therefore, are complicated and still forming. But I must say, all of the romances were amazing (and if I'm saying that, then it's a high compliment indeed). Silas and Daphne have my whole heart, and I enjoyed Mary and Frances' relationship, as well, even if I don't quite understand the physics/logic of ghosts. The idea that hauntings can be gentle and formed out of love makes me very happy and emotional.
The non-romantic relationships were phenomenal, as well. I loved Silas' dynamics with Isabella and the groundskeeper especially, the way that they care for one another and see themselves reflected in each other. These relationships didn't have to be romantic to be important to the story, and they are just as emotional and captivating as the two main romances. Silas' relationship with his brother George is more complicated than heartwarming, but I still appreciate the attention and nuance given to non-romantic connections such as theirs.
All in all, this is an amazing book, and I'd highly recommend it for anyone with the stomach to handle its many content warnings. (There is plenty of gore, misogyny, violence, abuse, body horror, rape, forced pregnancy, etc. etc. Seriously, look up a list of content warnings if you have any triggers to avoid.) I may have lingering questions about the worldbuilding and its implications, but the story itself is solid and compelling, and I will happily read any other novels that AJW puts out in the future. Plus, his covers look awesome!
Graphic: Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Pregnancy, Sexual assault, Abortion, Physical abuse, Animal death, Blood, Deadnaming, Forced institutionalization, Dysphoria, Injury/Injury detail, Ableism, Medical content, Body horror, Death, and Gaslighting
toto8's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Sexism, Ableism, Abortion, Body horror, Physical abuse, Medical content, Misogyny, Confinement, Deadnaming, Injury/Injury detail, Blood, Death, Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Pregnancy, Dysphoria, and Adult/minor relationship