Take a photo of a barcode or cover
adventurous
lighthearted
reflective
relaxing
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
On the whole I liked more than I disliked about Hearn's annotations.
He gives a refreshingly appropriate amount of credit to that one perennially brought up monetarist view of Oz: very little! (except iirc there is one annotation where Hearn credits one particular insight as plausible)
As a former teen Oz buff but latecomer to the Judy Garland movie and someone who doesn't ...like certain adaptational choices there, I also appreciated that Hearn doesn't adulate the movie here.
Personally I enjoyed the fact that the annotations kept bringing up stuff in the Russian "translation" (it would seem adaptationally akin to but less extreme than the Icelandic "Dracula") though I suppose ymmv.
I do have reason to suspect some of the witch related annotations involve ahistorical ideas about the eras of witch hunts, although the fact that Victorians/Edwardians, including Gage, with an eye toward feminist revisionism drew those conclusions is certainly relevant to Baum's outlook.
If I remember correctly, I think there's also an inaccuracy in the annotation describing gingham but I am a fiber crafts nerd and cannot realistically expect everyone to share my knowledge there (ala the xkcd about geologists... anyway, I didn't feel like it was as clueless a description as some very minor craft details in Wicked ).
He gives a refreshingly appropriate amount of credit to that one perennially brought up monetarist view of Oz: very little! (except iirc there is one annotation where Hearn credits one particular insight as plausible)
As a former teen Oz buff but latecomer to the Judy Garland movie and someone who doesn't ...like certain adaptational choices there, I also appreciated that Hearn doesn't adulate the movie here.
Personally I enjoyed the fact that the annotations kept bringing up stuff in the Russian "translation" (it would seem adaptationally akin to but less extreme than the Icelandic "Dracula") though I suppose ymmv.
I do have reason to suspect some of the witch related annotations involve ahistorical ideas about the eras of witch hunts, although the fact that Victorians/Edwardians, including Gage, with an eye toward feminist revisionism drew those conclusions is certainly relevant to Baum's outlook.
If I remember correctly, I think there's also an inaccuracy in the annotation describing gingham but I am a fiber crafts nerd and cannot realistically expect everyone to share my knowledge there (ala the xkcd about geologists... anyway, I didn't feel like it was as clueless a description as some very minor craft details in Wicked ).
I don't have any idea how to give this a star rating. It's a classic, and it's completely unhinged.
adventurous
lighthearted
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
medium-paced
Muy simple y constante. Lleno de una reflexión muy predecible. Cuando lo leí, no esperaba mucho, solo una lectura ligera más.
adventurous
funny
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I like the movie more, but there are parts of the book I wish had made it into the movie.
adventurous
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
adventurous
funny
inspiring
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
adventurous
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No