340 reviews for:

Échopraxie

Peter Watts

3.67 AVERAGE

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Such an awesome combo of Reddit atheism and dismissal of free will 
adventurous dark reflective tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

What a mind expanding novel. Like Blindsight you need to pay real close attention. I think a reread will give me many more answers.
But you get so much out of this book. A dense story, a realistic and at the same time fantastical universe and a real different view on things.
challenging dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

What a dense read! Highly technical even for hard sci-fi. Rich with unique concepts and philosophical musings on consciousness.
adventurous mysterious tense medium-paced
adventurous challenging mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
challenging informative mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I liked the character and the evocation of the earth setting better than Blindsight. Watts remains too pleased with how hard his, um, hard sci-fi… is. The incoherence and chaos of the narrative is largely from the science dumps, rather than the intentional incoherence. Like, I’m a PhD candidate in literature. I have bizarre chart-topping reading comprehension and have my whole life (plus lots of training). I think the bad info-dumping is tricking people into thinking their reading comprehension is bad when the problem is the writing. Could really stand to be a teeny bit more interested in the interpersonal dynamics and emotional experiences around vampires instead of just repeatedly, gleeful returning to the details of how he’s made them evolutionarily and biologically plausible. And, “hard” sci-fi jokes aside, Watts really keeps putting characters in all sorts of life and death tension and discomfort and bizarre intimacy and stress and nobody ever even kisses? Come on, man
dark reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes