You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.17 AVERAGE
3.17 AVERAGE
adventurous
funny
informative
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
adventurous
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Feels so passé to say like “this classic novel was underwhelming.” It’s a perfectly fine text, I read it for a course on theories of space, so that was my frame of reference. Lots to think about, but the narrative and style I thought were ok. Maybe I’ll appreciate it more with time and discussion.
DNF at some relatively early point.
You know the kind of writing where you're exhausted and praying for death by the end of each sentence because they're just so tedious and bland? This is that kind of writing. I know it's old; I've read plenty of old stories. That's not my problem with it.
I don't intend to rate based on politics, mostly because anyone can read this book and see it's painfully racist and anyone can also understand that it's from a different time. But I just want to make a note of the fact that yes, this is indeed very racist, and also very stupid. Crusoe is duuumb. Resourceful, I guess, but not predisposed to learning lessons from experiences. Not when they might challenge his view on something, anyway. Maybe this changes over the course of the book, but I can't be arsed getting there.
You know the kind of writing where you're exhausted and praying for death by the end of each sentence because they're just so tedious and bland? This is that kind of writing. I know it's old; I've read plenty of old stories. That's not my problem with it.
I don't intend to rate based on politics, mostly because anyone can read this book and see it's painfully racist and anyone can also understand that it's from a different time. But I just want to make a note of the fact that yes, this is indeed very racist, and also very stupid. Crusoe is duuumb. Resourceful, I guess, but not predisposed to learning lessons from experiences. Not when they might challenge his view on something, anyway. Maybe this changes over the course of the book, but I can't be arsed getting there.
adventurous
funny
mysterious
fast-paced
adventurous
dark
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
This book seems to be a protonovel, a progenitor to the idea of a today's modern novel. It is an adventure story meant to excite the imagination and satisfy the need for a suspenseful plot denouement. But you can't expect a novel written almost 3 centuries ago to follow the genre conventions established today. Stick with it.
This novel, an adventure of a type only possible in the 1600s and 1700s, reflects a real historical period of human development. For a book which was exploring the possibilities of how to write about an adventure as much as describing a story, this is a damn good ripping story. I don't care what anybody says, I loved it. And it's not just about a shipwreck on an island - there's cannibals, Spaniards, mutineers, pieces of eight, and 300 wolves in the Alps surrounding our hero armed only with single shot pistols and swords.
'Robinson Crusoe' is a snapshot of England during a time when the most of the world was a blank area on maps, which didn't stop these brave ruffians from going exploring and death literally was a minute away whenever travel was undertaken. It was fascinating to read those parts about how business paperwork and legal instruments of property transfer occurred, and how the various European aristocrat powers were crumbling under the rising power of the individual merchants and plantation entrepreneurs. Class and politics mattered, but brave ordinary men seeking adventure AND wealth were taking charge of their own particular destinies, which was not an option a few centuries earlier in feudal Europe. Business was becoming an energy force of society. Members of the lower classes could actually bump up the scale of society if they were prepared to risk everything by taking ship to Africa, South America and the United States.
This stage of novel exposition was cool, far superior to the century's previous poetry, religious instruction, and romantic adventure writing of what then was passing as an exciting book. Try to pay more attention to the details of Crusoe's Europe, the one Jack Sparrow would have really lived in, and not the book's deficiencies as a modern novel. It increases the value of reading this historic game changer in writing novels.
This novel, an adventure of a type only possible in the 1600s and 1700s, reflects a real historical period of human development. For a book which was exploring the possibilities of how to write about an adventure as much as describing a story, this is a damn good ripping story. I don't care what anybody says, I loved it. And it's not just about a shipwreck on an island - there's cannibals, Spaniards, mutineers, pieces of eight, and 300 wolves in the Alps surrounding our hero armed only with single shot pistols and swords.
'Robinson Crusoe' is a snapshot of England during a time when the most of the world was a blank area on maps, which didn't stop these brave ruffians from going exploring and death literally was a minute away whenever travel was undertaken. It was fascinating to read those parts about how business paperwork and legal instruments of property transfer occurred, and how the various European aristocrat powers were crumbling under the rising power of the individual merchants and plantation entrepreneurs. Class and politics mattered, but brave ordinary men seeking adventure AND wealth were taking charge of their own particular destinies, which was not an option a few centuries earlier in feudal Europe. Business was becoming an energy force of society. Members of the lower classes could actually bump up the scale of society if they were prepared to risk everything by taking ship to Africa, South America and the United States.
This stage of novel exposition was cool, far superior to the century's previous poetry, religious instruction, and romantic adventure writing of what then was passing as an exciting book. Try to pay more attention to the details of Crusoe's Europe, the one Jack Sparrow would have really lived in, and not the book's deficiencies as a modern novel. It increases the value of reading this historic game changer in writing novels.
There's a kind of economical simplicity to the narrative and prose in Robinson Crusoe (another way to say I found it flat). I recall hearing somewhere that this volume represents an early fiction of liberal capitalist ideology.