640 reviews for:

Spoonbenders

Daryl Gregory

3.87 AVERAGE


Believe the descriptions that tell you this is lit-fic with speculative seasoning. It struck a decent balance, in my opinion.

I thought it was an engaging family story with some deft plotting and solid (if realistically frustrating) characters. It’s a fine read and well worth the time. It isn’t my favorite of Gregory’s books—but, really, that fact isn’t anything to sneeze at.

Wavered between 3 stars and 4 stars. Had great heart and some truly farcical humour I enjoyed. The meaningful naming of characters also nice touch
dark funny mysterious medium-paced
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

This was a really fun book to read! I am a sucker for Chicago-based books anyway and it delivered. I enjoyed the way the family story was told and was wondering until the end how the story lines would resolve. It was a book that ended and I thought, "oh, no. It's done!"

Violence, love, humor, ridiculousness. It's all there.

O tipo de história tão bem construída, com personagens tão diferentes entre si e mesmo assim tão cativantes, que não existe outra escolha senão dar 5 estrelas. Teria lido muito mais rápido não fosse a ressaca literária desse mês.

I got about a third into it and couldn't finish it. Most of the Telemarchus family are scummy, abusive grifters and I lost interest in their doings. Others may enjoy it more.

A Worldcon recommendation that didn't work out.
funny mysterious medium-paced
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I don't know what it is about this book, but I just could not seem to get in to the story. It had interesting characters, a well thought out plot line, and was well written. However, it never really clicked for me. It could have been that I could not connect with any of the characters; they all seemed selfishly focused on themselves, with the guise of it being for others. I think the character I most enjoyed, and could empathize with, was silent, stalwart Buddy; who worked behind the scenes cryptically. He genuinely loved his family and was working with their best interests in mind, not his own.

It could also have been the mob story line, as I am not a fan of organized crime fiction. Just seems so dry, and the problems that lead to dealing with the mob completely avoidable. Yes, I understand how these interactions might come to be, but it seems like a simple lack of communication between family that leads to trouble. Again, the family being too proud, or to mighty, to ask for help. Or thinking this is the only way, and that their family has pushed them into this terrible scenario.

Read more at www.onemamassummer.weebly.com/bookreviews/spoonbenders

The Amazing Telemachus Family were about to reach dizzying heights of fame and fortune in the 1970s, when a live television magic display went all wrong and they were revealed as nothing but tricksters. Now, two decades on the family are still dealing with the fall-out from what happened then. Only they weren't tricksters, they really do have powers, as Matty has just learned for himself with his astral projection.


Told from the viewpoint of the different family members; Teddy, a master conman, heads up a clan who possess gifts he only fakes: Irene, the human lie detector; Frankie, gifted with telekinesis; and Buddy, the clairvoyant, and the next generation is represented by Matty.


It's an interesting story. One I almost gave up on because I have this thing where I ignore chapter headings even when I know they are important and so had to keep double checking who exactly was telling the story. But that's my fault, not the books. Because really it is quite easy to tell who's narrating what, they all have their own quirks and mannerisms.


I picked this on up because Simon Mayo ((who I follow on account of wittertainment. Hello to Jason Isaacs)) tweeted about it when I was considering my next read. I guess I'm suggestible like that. So I requested it and it came in ((people of Ireland, use your libraries, the new request system is totes amazeballs)) and I read it. And I enjoyed it.


It isn't my usual sort of book, and I don't think I would have picked it up without that rec, but it is always good to try new things from time to time. How else will you learn what you like and don't like? It is an easy read, but not altogether a fluff read. It brings up plenty of interesting topics, how women end up having to do the heavy lifting in families ((see also Metafilter threads on emotional labour)) and what happens when you can see the future and it is something you don't want to happen. How do you deal with that when you know that if you've seen it *that* has to happen, but maybe some fuzzy things can be changed, and if they can how do you do that?


As I said, I quite liked this book, it was entertaining, humourous, and is worth a read.


It is also one of those books that shows how useless it is to categorise books by genre. It features a magical family, therefore it is fantasy. Only I wouldn't say that many bookshops or libraries ((if they have these sections)) would market it as such, it goes with the general fiction. And non-fantasy fans would have no problem reading and enjoying it, never once thinking that it might be a fantasy book, because they don't like that sort of thing :) Well, maybe they just don't like epic fantasy... after all, all fiction is fantasy when you think about it because it is all made up.


3.5

I read this since it's a Nebula finalist. I would have recommended this as a good vacation read, but the author needs to seek out and listen to feedback from more women. The female characters were poorly written enough that 20% of the way into the book I actually flipped to the acknowledgements to see if *any* women were listed as having read it before publication.