Scan barcode
christopherward's review
adventurous
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
livingdeadenby's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
_viscosity_'s review
adventurous
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
pamwinkler's review
3.0
Well, occasional racism and a lot of stereotypes. Overall, entertaining in a pulpy way. You could compare it to Lovecraft; both pulpy in their way. Lovecraft occasionally has the 'holy crap!' sort of outlier though; the ones that are just fantastic. In my opinion as a Lovecraft fan, let's admit that. This guy doesn't have the same sort of occasional brilliance to me.
jeremyjfloyd's review
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
cthuwu's review against another edition
5.0
as someone who loves both pulp novels and sherlock holmes this one was a definite treat! i can't wait to start the next one!!
distgenius's review against another edition
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
arachan's review
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Disclaimer: The Jules de Grandin stories were written for the Weird Tales Magazine, famous for publishing H.P Lovecraft, Robert Howard and others. A certain level of racism/sexism/general-isms is to be expected. There are a couple of howlers but honestly, nothing as pervasive as Lovecraft.
I will say that these stories are significantly more readable than those of Lovecraft. Seabury Quinn was far and away the most popular writer for Weird Tales and these were the most requested and beloved stories. It's really obvious why. Quinn owes an obvious debt to Conan Doyle - Jules de Grandin also puts me in mind of Christie's Poirot but I don't think the time-line is quite right.
The stories are fun. Not super serious and formulaic in a way that can get repetitive if you read the whole book in one sitting. They work better if read one at a time but they are well-paced and fun. Definitely intended to be published in a periodic magazine.
Jules de Grandin is a lot of fun. A little stereotypical but full of energy and confidence. He's also (as I read him) coded as transmasc. Dr. Trowbridge, our relentlessly materialistic narrator, constantly talks about de Grandin's womanly proportions and habits. Not intentional, given the times it was written, but it makes more sense to me.
I will say that these stories are significantly more readable than those of Lovecraft. Seabury Quinn was far and away the most popular writer for Weird Tales and these were the most requested and beloved stories. It's really obvious why. Quinn owes an obvious debt to Conan Doyle - Jules de Grandin also puts me in mind of Christie's Poirot but I don't think the time-line is quite right.
The stories are fun. Not super serious and formulaic in a way that can get repetitive if you read the whole book in one sitting. They work better if read one at a time but they are well-paced and fun. Definitely intended to be published in a periodic magazine.
Jules de Grandin is a lot of fun. A little stereotypical but full of energy and confidence. He's also (as I read him) coded as transmasc. Dr. Trowbridge, our relentlessly materialistic narrator, constantly talks about de Grandin's womanly proportions and habits. Not intentional, given the times it was written, but it makes more sense to me.
Moderate: Ableism, Racism, Xenophobia, Sexism, Body horror, Classism, Colonisation, and Racial slurs
thevultureeye's review
Couldn't hold my attention, started falling asleep during the first 3 stories. Don't think I'll go back to it any time soon.
yambooks's review
adventurous
dark
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
More...