Scan barcode
maxain_kelsier's review against another edition
5.0
Si queres empezar a leer sobre comunismo o socialismo, este es el libro indicado como primera lectura, Engels hace 25 preguntas con sus respectivas 25 respuestas, desde que es comunismo o que es el proletariado etc
yahyaelkinani's review against another edition
4.0
Guiding book. Basically explains what communism entails and what communists strive for.
maozetinna's review against another edition
5.0
The essential introduction to communism. It very briefly covers the conditions which have lead capitalism and why communism is necessary as the next step.
brechtian's review against another edition
Perhaps controversial, but I actually think this is an even stronger, more accessible, and more concise beginner introduction to Communism than Marx’s Manifesto, though obviously they both cover many of the same ideas. Great recommendation for someone who has not read any theory and wants to take their very first step into Marxism.
odutty's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
4.0
1 star as Engels, similar to all leftists in history, has failed to account for human nature rendering this work a poorly written children's fantasy novel. smh
andredias's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
tense
fast-paced
1.5
"The Principles of Communism" by Friedrich Engels is a tedious and intellectually deficient work that fails to provide a coherent and convincing argument for the merits of communism. Engels, in his attempt to elucidate the principles of this ideology, falls short in several crucial aspects.
Firstly, Engels displays a lack of consideration for the inherent flaws in the implementation of communism. His utopian vision fails to acknowledge the human tendency towards self-interest and the potential for abuse of power in a society where the state holds immense control. History has shown that attempts to establish communism have often resulted in authoritarian regimes that suppress individual freedoms and stifle innovation.
Furthermore, Engels' economic analysis is simplistic and unrealistic. His advocacy for the abolition of private property neglects the importance of incentives in driving productivity and innovation. The absence of a competitive market, as proposed by Engels, undermines the dynamism and efficiency that capitalism fosters.
Engels also overlooks the diversity of human needs and aspirations. His insistence on the uniformity of social conditions and the elimination of social classes neglects the rich tapestry of human experiences and motivations. The one-size-fits-all approach advocated in "The Principles of Communism" disregards the complexity of individual preferences and talents.
Additionally, Engels' vision lacks a practical roadmap for the transition to communism. The absence of a clear and feasible plan undermines the credibility of his proposals, leaving any person with common sense skeptical about the practicality of implementing such a radical societal shift.
In conclusion, "The Principles of Communism" is a misguided and impractical treatise that fails to address the fundamental flaws of communism. Engels' lack of consideration for human nature, economic realities, and the diversity of human experiences weakens the overall argument and renders the book unconvincing and irrelevant in the face of historical evidence and practical considerations.
Firstly, Engels displays a lack of consideration for the inherent flaws in the implementation of communism. His utopian vision fails to acknowledge the human tendency towards self-interest and the potential for abuse of power in a society where the state holds immense control. History has shown that attempts to establish communism have often resulted in authoritarian regimes that suppress individual freedoms and stifle innovation.
Furthermore, Engels' economic analysis is simplistic and unrealistic. His advocacy for the abolition of private property neglects the importance of incentives in driving productivity and innovation. The absence of a competitive market, as proposed by Engels, undermines the dynamism and efficiency that capitalism fosters.
Engels also overlooks the diversity of human needs and aspirations. His insistence on the uniformity of social conditions and the elimination of social classes neglects the rich tapestry of human experiences and motivations. The one-size-fits-all approach advocated in "The Principles of Communism" disregards the complexity of individual preferences and talents.
Additionally, Engels' vision lacks a practical roadmap for the transition to communism. The absence of a clear and feasible plan undermines the credibility of his proposals, leaving any person with common sense skeptical about the practicality of implementing such a radical societal shift.
In conclusion, "The Principles of Communism" is a misguided and impractical treatise that fails to address the fundamental flaws of communism. Engels' lack of consideration for human nature, economic realities, and the diversity of human experiences weakens the overall argument and renders the book unconvincing and irrelevant in the face of historical evidence and practical considerations.