784 reviews for:

Universality

Natasha Brown

3.48 AVERAGE

momof4borum's review against another edition

DID NOT FINISH

Just wasn't interesting
funny informative mysterious reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: N/A
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

This was such a fascinating take on class and storytelling. I very much enjoyed the structure and seeing the narrative unfold one layer at a time as we watched the fallout, for several characters, of the first sections long-form article. The characters were well-written and believable and it brings up interesting thoughts about the power of words, language, and stories. 

Medan jag läser Universality funderar jag på vad jag egentligen gillade med Assembly. En kvinna med cancer som … tänkte…? I min recension har jag dessutom skrivit att det är för akademiskt och för rasismcentrerat och för mörkt. Jag gissar att det var det sistnämnda som fick mig på fall…?
Den här boken har precis samma DNA, men blir ännu mer för-för mycket av allt. Brown försöker för mycket, använder omvänd psykologi (eller omvänd politik, om det finns nåt sånt?) och missar alla känslomål på vägen. Jag brydde mig om Assemblys huvudperson, här finns inte en enda sympati. Och då blir det ”akademiska” (smarta?) plötsligt bara pretentiöst. Jag läser redan The Observer varje söndag, så den här omvända, omständliga versionen av brittisk kultur var helt överflödig.
Sorry-not sorry. (Hon får ju en extra stjärna för begåvat språk.)
challenging fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I am not smart enough for this author. I know she writes really well, but I never get what she’s doing with her books. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
funny reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

a sharp, funny exploration of class, privilege, and the power of language. the writing here is thought-provoking and snappy and the characters, though unlikeable, are compelling. liked the book's structure a lot and thought the inclusion of the full article that is the focus of the book was smart. overall, liked this one a lot




medium-paced
Loveable characters: No

It’s quick and stimulating. It’s capitalism, consumerism, climate change, politics, equal rights -- and is there anything else?

The story started when Jake grabbed a solid gold bar worth a half million just sitting on the mantel. He used it to strike an activist down. He had enough of Pegasus who formed a self-sustaining farm community: the Universalists. This leader was striving to create change with equal rights for everyone except he was in control.

The characters made it seem like a TV series with the billionaire, Richard Spencer, the journalist, Lenny Leonard, the interviewer, Marin Bass, and the runaway with the gold. I could see similarities with politics and greed.

The story touched on real-life news stories related to class divisions and racism with the power of words. This short book had a lot to say. It was set up to send readers into a storm of thoughts.

My thanks to Random House and NetGalley for allowing me to read an advanced copy of this book with an expected release date of March 4, 2025.

I'm not against a book being more commentary and ideas than plot, but it was like this tried a load of different loose plot lines until it just ended up following one of them at random to the end, and for me the social commentary got lost along the way too. It started off with an attack at a hippy rave during the Covid lockdown, and seemed to be going down the mystery route, but ended up with a 50 page breakdown of a controversial journalist giving her take on politics, society and culture. I don't even remember what happened in the middle but it was barely related to either of these things. I just felt a bit lost throughout and couldn't connect to any of the characters or plot lines.