tommy_g's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

writtenbypoets's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

So. It's complicated. 
In the first half of the book, I was mesmerized by the poetic writing style and descriptions. I can only speak for the German version and its writing. I loved to see Aschenbach come to terms with his struggle and finally realize that he needed a change. I was convinced that it would be a 5-star read. 

 
Then the pedophilia entered the subtext, at first very subtly, but quickly added very clearly into dialogue and the plot. His obsession with the 14-year-old little Polish boy took me aback. It pulled me completely out of the story and I couldn't ignore it or just observe it from afar. 
Aschenbach's behavior gets criticized by the story through the boy's family trying to keep him away from Aschenbach. But still. 
Maybe I'm just very sensitive when it comes to pedophilia. 

If you like poetic writing and can read about the themes listed above I would recommend it. It just wasn't for me in that regard.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

welkinvault's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Dense, beautiful prose.  I was merely enjoying the prose (just wash over me until the first time the object of Gustav's obsession, a beautiful older child (and the all descriptions is of a child in his apparal and interactions with his family in the earlier part of the book).  I have difficulties getting beyond the descriptions of his 'gratification', his stalking, his desire to continue to observe and to devise ways to touch the boy's hair, etc. 

I felt it was very fitting that this desire, and the inability to leave Venice, brought about his mortal destruction.

Not really for me.   This is in many way, a very unemotional book, stunningly descriptive, often reflective, but passive. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lauraetlabora's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bazzie101's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

A self righteous author has a midlife crisis and stalks and lusts after a prepubescent boy on vocation with his family. So gross 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

shrewdbard's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
Reading Death in Venice, it got me thinking about how biographers of Mann thought him to be a pedophile, based on diary entries he wrote about his feelings towards his own sons. Thinking about how Vladimir Nabokov thought Mann was a hack. Thinking about how, although it escapes many people’s reading comprehension, Lolita is not a romance. Thinking about The Enchanter, the novella Nabokov wrote as a precursor to Lolita, where the pedophile narrator stops short of assaulting his victim, and is so wracked with guilt he kills himself. Thinking about, in Lolita, how Humbert Humbert meets a pedophile who targets young boys, and is disgusted by him. Doesn’t seem to realize they are ultimately the same. Thinking about the person reading the introduction, saying this was a more sympathetic translation, when it came across as quite damning to me. Thinking, thinking, thinking.

I loved the imagery where Venetian gondolas are compared to Death’s boat on the River Styx. Also, Tadzio as the sunrise itself lighting outside Aschenbach’s window every morning. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alisylvi's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

eviebryant's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

This was violent, truly. The way that tadzio is not only based on a real boy, but also the way mann describes the fourteen year old boy within the book as nothing more than a statue of absolute perfection really makes your spine tingle. Aschenbachs devotion to watching tadzio on his trip to venice is truly disturbing.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lunalyce's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

paulathepudding's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings