Scan barcode
vezreads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Racism, Religious bigotry, and Violence
Moderate: Transphobia
evilyn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Transphobia and Racism
savvylit's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
The congregants at the center of this novel are righteous and certain of their own goodness. Throughout Pew, their one-sided conversations with the stranger uncover the truth; that good intentions do not beget good actions. In a slow and foreboding fashion reminiscent of the horror genre, Lacey portrays the manipulative side of charity. When generosity was never asked for, who does it really serve and who does it harm?
Furthermore, Catherine Lacey has created a narrator who is unknown and ambiguous to both the book's characters and to readers. In doing so, Lacey has deftly revealed modern society's reliance on forcing individuals to conform to specific ways of being. Readers discover that this form of projection and pressure only creates opportunity for harm and animosity.
Pew is truly a masterwork of a novel that I will never forget. This particular copy was a library loan but I look forward to owning my very own copy. I think Pew would fit perfectly and seamlessly alongside books by Carson McCullers, Flannery O'Connor, and Shirley Jackson on my bookshelf.
Graphic: Racism, Xenophobia, Religious bigotry, Toxic relationship, Dysphoria, Outing, Transphobia, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Violence, Hate crime, and Confinement
rosalind's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Animal death
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail, Grief, Religious bigotry, Racism, and Xenophobia
Minor: Transphobia, Medical content, and Violence
annarose_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
content/trigger warnings for transphobia, racism and xenophobia, mentions of lynching and sexual assault and (idk how to word this but) wanting to force a person to get undressed so they can 'understand what sort of person they are' (basically a sickening mix of assault and transphobia)
Graphic: Transphobia, Xenophobia, Racism, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Sexual assault and Sexual harassment
solenekeleroux's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Racism, Transphobia, Alcohol, and Emotional abuse
astronut's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Transphobia
serendipitysbooks's review against another edition
4.5
Pew was a short but special read that cleverly threw doubt at the practise of Christian kindness. It also looked at constructs like race, gender, nationality and sexuality and how they can be used to divide, as an excuse to treat some people as less worthy than others.
When a family arrives at church one Sunday they find a stranger asleep in their pew. The person seems unwilling or unable to speak and their race, age and gender are all unclear. The family “kindly” takes the stranger in and give them the moniker Pew. Despite assurances that Pew is welcome it becomes clear they aren’t. The family and the church community at large are simply unable to cope with not knowing whether Pew is male or female, how old they are, what race they are or where they come from. They claim they need to know for reasons of safety but the links between that information and safety is never really made clear. Additionally the church folk believe that accepting their charity obliged Pew to conform to their wishes. Racial divides in the town are evident and after being locked in a room (to keep others safe) and refusing to cooperate with a medical exam, Pew is sent to stay with a Black family on the other side of town where it is claimed Pew will be more comfortable.
The story ends with a very creepy Forgiveness Festival, which seems to be a way for residents to feel forgiven for all their wrongdoings without actually having to apologise or do anything in the way of redress.
I really liked the writing style all. The fragmentary sentences effectively conveyed snippets of overheard conversation.
Pew could have been an immigrant, a refugee, transgender, male, female, Black, White, Asian, Latinx...In the construct of this story it didn’t really matter. Pew was a person, a person in need of help and hospitality. And yet this white church community could not be genuinely welcoming and hospitable because they could not be sure who Pew was. Pew’s humanity was not enough to warrant more than a facade of kindness.
Moral of this story is don’t be like the residents of this church community.
Moderate: Bullying, Racism, and Transphobia