You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
idrilcelebrindal's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Graphic: Body shaming, Bullying, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Mental illness, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Alcohol
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders, Vomit, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Minor: Sexual assault and Pregnancy
tobyw's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
What I was warned about going in was that it was very heavy on smut and pretty light on plot, so I wasn't really expecting too much to actually happen. I find it kind of weird that people complain about "plotless" romances where... the romance... is the plot, you guys. Two people meeting, falling in love, and starting a relationship is the basic structure of a romance novel. Expectations should be set according to genre; that's the whole point of genre conventions.
Anyway, this was a very conventional romance, but it ticks the boxes really well. I appreciated that the author decided to write from both Anastasia and Nate's perspectives, because reading from Nate's perspective endeared me a lot to him. Something that puts me off from romance novels is that the male love interest is usually just tropes in a trenchcoat. Nate was still kind of a fluffy too-good-to-be-true golden retriever, but he had some stuff going on inside his head, and that was a relief.
A lot of the low reviews complain about Anastasia, but I didn't really have a problem with her. She was a nice break from a typical romance heroine of not-so-long-ago. I'll take 1000 Anastasia Allens over a Tessa Young or an Anastasia Steele any day. Her annoying traits just served to humanize her. Yes, she's preachy about how everyone should go to therapy, but I know half a dozen people just like her.
Another thing I heard from multiple people was that the cast is bloated with side characters. I think that's both true and... not true, if that's possible. The cast is much more fleshed out than that of your typical romance novel, but it suited my taste fine. I prefer Bridgerton the TV show with its many subplots and secondary characters, compared with the narrow-minded novels. I was also aware that this is a series where Hannah Grace intends to give major side characters (Russ, Henry, etc) their own moment in the sun, so I was happy to get a taste of their characterization while they also served their own purposes in the Icebreaker plot. The Bridgerton comparison is apt in that respect too. If the only thing you care about is Anastasia and Nate getting together, then I understand why you'd feel like all the side characters detract from the story. For me, seeing Nate's friendships with Robbie, JJ, and Henry, and Anastasia's with Lola, Henry, and Russ helped add dimensions to them as romantic leads.
The areas the book missed were not so significant as to ruin the reading experience, but here they are nonetheless:
As always, this book would've benefited from a more stringent editor. Sometimes Grace formed sentences in a way that was truly baffling or just completely out of order. I learned at the end that she's British writing Americans, which explains a couple mangled expressions that a stricter editor could have corrected.
I'm pretty sure Grace has never watched a game of hockey in her life, given how obviously glossed over every game that Nate played had to be. "He scored" and you can't even throw in a mention of it being a wrist shot, or going five hole, or something? I also believe the only two mentioned final scores are 8-3 and 9-3, which are just on the edge of ridiculous. I'll let it slide because it is collegiate hockey. My uni's team beat another one 13-0 last season, so I guess anything's possible. Anyway, that lack of either research or interest made Nate's characterization as a hockey player suffer. You're telling me he LOVES hockey and he's on the verge of going pro, and yet he's not excitedly giving a play by play of his best moments in his own internal monologue right after games? Sure.
The smut was fine -- not so metaphorical as to become soppy, and not so explicitly detailed as to become distasteful -- although as I was warned, the dirty talk is pretty over the top. It's great that Nate is so explicit about consent, but consent is also necessary before you tell her that you own her pussy, bud. My criticism for the sex scenes is the lack of variation in how their feelings were explored. It's basically All Horny, All The Time. The purpose of the scenes was solely sexual gratification and it didn't develop their relationship with each other at all. Especially because something as significant as body shaming and disordered eating is brought up in other parts of the novel, but all of that switches off as soon as Anastasia is having sex, somehow.
A major misfire for me is the scene near the end
The biggest fail of the novel is actually how Grace manages scene vs summary, or showing vs telling. A shitton of information, scenes, dialogue, and characterization is delivered in summary instead of proper, written-out scenes, and the book is a lot weaker for it. It does allow Grace to get across a lot quickly, but that writing style risks trying to cram in unearned characterization, and there were points where that cropped up as a real flaw in the storytelling.
And my nittiest pick -- the nicknames... Someone should have flagged to Grace that "Stassie" is waaaaay too close to "Stasi", and Staatssicherheit is not a cute nickname for your girlfriend. Multiple characters refer to each other by their last names, which makes perfect sense for hockey players, since that's what's on the back of your jersey, but doesn't make sense for Anastasia and Lola. It would be fun if they picked it up from Nate and Robbie, but it starts at the beginning of the novel and just never stops. Also, Anastasia's last name is ALLEN. THAT'S JUST A DUDE'S NAME. Every time Nate called her Allen, I flashed into an alternate universe where Nate's love interest is some dude in a flannel button down with a receding hairline who works in IT.
Anyway, it was great to finally be able to turn my brain off and just enjoy a light book like this. Obviously as I've enumerated, there are lots of problems in the writing, but overall, it was a fun time. I'll check out Wildfire.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Body shaming and Eating disorder
margaret_k30's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Graphic: Eating disorder, Sexual content, Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Body shaming, Emotional abuse, and Alcohol
Minor: Blood, Grief, Death of parent, Pregnancy, and Injury/Injury detail
alicesbookcorner's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
4.25
Graphic: Body shaming, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Sexual content, Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Pregnancy
whitneys_bookstack's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Moderate: Eating disorder
Minor: Sexual harassment
miafoster44's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Moderate: Eating disorder
Minor: Infidelity, Death of parent, Toxic friendship, and Sexual harassment
becxaa's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Eating disorder
Moderate: Toxic relationship
k8lynn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Graphic: Ableism, Body shaming, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Misogyny, Sexual content, Violence, Pregnancy, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Alcohol
_tannel's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Body shaming, Eating disorder, and Sexual content
coffaeandpages's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Eating disorder, Sexual content, Toxic friendship, and Sexual harassment