Reviews

The Sea Wolf by Jack London

galois's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective tense medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

First half is incredible; second half is disappointing.

thatgirlkorie's review

Go to review page

3.0

This book is a wild ride. A little hard to get into at first but it really started to pull me in.

italorebelo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced

4.0

bengaliyaoi's review

Go to review page

3.0

Look at me. Forget Hannigram and Sasuke/Naruto or whatever the hell you think is the prototype for toxic homoeroticism. I am going to tell you this once, and I want you to engrave this into your memory: Wolf Larsen and Humphrey Van Weyden are the ancestor of all gay and violent erotic tension.

Wolf Larsen is perhaps one of the best male characters ever conceived of, and were this novel published in the 21st century, I am convinced that young men everywhere would have modeled his behavior after him. His name is WOLF. He’s self-educated. He regularly shanghaies people into working for him. He beats the shit out of like five men at once. He beats the shit out of a shark. He engages in philosophical debates, and is described by our narrator as handsome and good-looking, and his physique has our narrator literally speechless. His eyes are beautiful. He makes his own navigational tools. At some point in the book I was expecting Hump to describe the perfect shape of his dick, such was the insanity of the descriptions that Humphrey kept laying down on him.

Humphrey is fine. He’s very much an ideological vessel, going up against Larsen’s individualistic and violent beliefs, but the great joy in Humphrey’s character lays in how utterly besotted he seems with Wolf Larsen, and how utterly he loathes him in equal measure. Larsen favors Van Weyden in a weird sadistic way, and Van Weyden hates him for it, but also takes great pride in his new duties. It’s bonkers. The first half of 60% of the book is just them being violent and tense around each other, in between discussions about mortality underpinned by intellectual sexual tension so thick you could cut a knife with it. If the entire book was just this I would’ve loved it, but unfortunately Maud Brewster arrives, and Humphrey remembers that he’s a heterosexual and that women are important, and the rest of the book is spent as Humphrey whines and tries to act masculine for Maud and Wolf Larsen is relegated to the sidelines as a boring and bland romance just…occurs in between Maud and Humphrey.

Now. Do you think this book had women in the early 1900s acting like fujoshis and saying shit like “UGH why did Maud even arrive things were sooo good between Wolf and Hump

rottenjester's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

made me appreciate the whale infodumping in Moby Dick more. at least that was interesting

mbucalo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

monta's review

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

3.75

lordchampion666's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

A gold standard for adventure books, the battle against nature and growth of the main character is wonderful to follow. Wolf Larson is one of my all time favorite characters. His unapologetic confidejce in himself and his place as the greatest impact on the firmament was so interesting and even though he was capable of extreme violence and had a very harsh set of beliefs, they never changed and he was always true to his beliefs.  Despite being the antagonist, I found myself yearning for the conversations with him and was even rooting for him at the end. The discussions of philosophy are so engaging that they get me thinking as well. 

smack_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I was planning on giving this book a 3/5 until I read the last line of the novel. This whole book was shaped as a physiological thriller, and for most of it it actually was. That was until it felt like it took a huge 180 and became some kind of romance novel. For most of the novel Humphrey was analyzing how harsh environments like on a ship affected the people on it and he was constantly trying to understand the phycology of Wolf Larson, this guy who basically has no empathy for others and also forced him to even be on the ship. Then suddenly he’s just worried about how much he’s in love with Maud. It just felt underwhelming. I also feel like it should have ended way before it did, it just felt so dragged on. Lastly, it seemed like the climax happened behind the scenes?? This part is sort of a spoiler but I feel like tue climax of the novel would have been when all of Larson’s men turned on him and he took a turn for the worst but Humphrey wasn’t even there to see it. I would’ve been way more interested in that than Humphrey building a hut on some island.

velocitygirl14's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

A complex and tense book that was both dark and engrossing at the same time. It was so weird that it could work as a deconstruction on morality and toxic masculinity.