Scan barcode
mugsandmanuscripts's review
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This novel is an astute exploration of grief with a side of shrewd commentary on the art and life of a writer.
The unnamed narrator, a writer, spends months working through her acute grief after her mentor and best friend commits suicide. Her complex and often muddled feelings toward him complicate her journey. The narrator is well-developed and entirely believable; she is unsure of herself, unsure of her feelings, not always completely honest with herself (although, I think, strives to be), and deeply engulfed in her grief (but, with dry humor, also still indignant at her late mentor's incessant womanizing).
As she processes her loss, she also processes her relationship with her mentor and what he meant to her. She also ruminates on the academic field of writing itself as well as many of the difficulties inherent to working in the field. Given that her friend was also her writing professor many years ago, it seems natural that processing her loss also causes these tangental reflections to surface.
The narrator is joined in her grief by the dog of her late mentor, as his wife isn't interested in caring for the heartbroken animal. The relationship complicates her life significantly, since the dog is huge (a great dane), old (and therefore ailing), and not allowed in her apartment. She faces eviction and the well-meaning, though seemingly heavy concern of her friends.
I really loved this one, which surprised me a little bit. I normally like books that are a little more plot-focused, but this one was just so well-done and engaging. I honestly wouldn’t change anything at all.
The unnamed narrator, a writer, spends months working through her acute grief after her mentor and best friend commits suicide. Her complex and often muddled feelings toward him complicate her journey. The narrator is well-developed and entirely believable; she is unsure of herself, unsure of her feelings, not always completely honest with herself (although, I think, strives to be), and deeply engulfed in her grief (but, with dry humor, also still indignant at her late mentor's incessant womanizing).
As she processes her loss, she also processes her relationship with her mentor and what he meant to her. She also ruminates on the academic field of writing itself as well as many of the difficulties inherent to working in the field. Given that her friend was also her writing professor many years ago, it seems natural that processing her loss also causes these tangental reflections to surface.
The narrator is joined in her grief by the dog of her late mentor, as his wife isn't interested in caring for the heartbroken animal. The relationship complicates her life significantly, since the dog is huge (a great dane), old (and therefore ailing), and not allowed in her apartment. She faces eviction and the well-meaning, though seemingly heavy concern of her friends.
I really loved this one, which surprised me a little bit. I normally like books that are a little more plot-focused, but this one was just so well-done and engaging. I honestly wouldn’t change anything at all.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Grief and Suicide
This book reads like an astute exploration of grief with a side of shrewd commentary on the art and life of a writer. The nameless female narrator spends the book working through her acute grief after her mentor and best friend commits suicide. The grief is complicated by her complex feelings toward her mentor, including possibly romantic feelings for him (which she herself isn’t sure about) as well as anger toward him for his womanizing.materiality's review
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Grief
Moderate: Suicide attempt, Suicide, Suicidal thoughts, and Death
leefox's review
emotional
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide attempt, Suicide, and Grief
brinnavirginia's review
emotional
hopeful
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Suicide attempt, Death, and Grief
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Misogyny, and Infidelity
Minor: Excrement and Vomit
ahorowitz25's review
dark
emotional
sad
slow-paced
1.0
Unfortunately, this book is a great example of misleading blurbs. I thought this was a tale about how a woman copes with her friend's suicide by taking in the man's dog, Apollo, and how both animal and human help each other grieve of the unexpected death. Instead, I got a middle-aged woman’s long-winded, wandering pontifications and justifications of her friend's repeated adultering and infidelities with his students and colleagues because he insisted that "a college setting encourages such behavior."
Gross.
Is it well written in a profoundly literary (read: pretentious and grating) style? Yes. But I just couldn’t get past how nauseous the male prof made me. I shouldn’t have bothered finishing it.
Gross.
Is it well written in a profoundly literary (read: pretentious and grating) style? Yes. But I just couldn’t get past how nauseous the male prof made me. I shouldn’t have bothered finishing it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Grief, and Infidelity
Moderate: Rape, Sexual assault, Trafficking, and Kidnapping
Minor: Animal death
reshusky's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I think the subjects could have been handled better. Felt less like it was focusing on grief, and more on complaining about new authors/students. The bits about the dog and grief were good, the book feels intimate but it also felt like a complaint more than a novel.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Grief and Suicidal thoughts
Minor: Animal death and Animal cruelty
jodibee's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Grief and Suicide
sonjs's review
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
I loved Sigrid Nunez’s intimate writing style. The narrator felt like a close friend telling me a story. A Harlequin Great Dane is a major character in this story about love, friendship , the mystery and pain surrounding suicide , and grief. I rarely read books a second time but this one I will . I’m also going to read her new book The Vulnerables .
Content Warnings
Moderate: Grief and Suicide
kaitidid's review
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Not a classic dog book. More about grieving a flawed individual, and about writing itself. If you’re looking for “Marley and Me”, this isn’t it. But what it is is strange and wonderful.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Grief
Moderate: Misogyny, Rape, Toxic relationship, Animal death, Death, Suicide attempt, Animal cruelty, Sexism, Sexual violence, Slavery, Suicide, and Trafficking
Minor: Ableism, Toxic relationship, and Dementia
icarusandthesun's review against another edition
funny
hopeful
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
charming—i'm pleasantly surprised! i impulse-bought this book even though the synopsis didn't particularly speak to me, and i'm honestly really glad i did.
- there was lots of talk about books and the act of writing and writing as a form of art (a given since both main characters are writers), which i, as a writer myself, throughly enjoyed, but i can definitely see how that's not a relatable topic for everyone.
- the book's quite funny at times, and what i found especially entertaining was the upbeat writing style constantly being paired with incredibly grave topics.
- the characters weren't lovable at all imo (except for the dog, ofc), but rather just plain interesting to observe.
- the feminist commentary (if you can call it that?) was confusing as hell. like it was sort of feminist but then some lines weren't at all—quite the opposite. idk, it was confusing.
- the feminist commentary (if you can call it that?) was confusing as hell. like it was sort of feminist but then some lines weren't at all—quite the opposite. idk, it was confusing.
- the plot... was basically non-existent. no plot, just vibes is all. i guess there was a plot twist, but that one was just really unnecessary. it wasn't impactful at all, because it didn't actually change anything. it wasn't some sort of great revelation that would make the reader feel betrayed, it didn't make the reader feel anything, really.
another point of criticism i have is that most of the book's depth comes from quoting other authors. the narrator references other authors and works like every other page and i found that most of the lines i underlined/annotated were just said quotes. so i'm wondering a little bit—how much did nunez actually add to the depth and grade of profundity of her own book?
something i also want to mention, even though a few other reviews have already done so, is that the book doesn't live up to its synopsis... so if you expect the things in the synopsis it's invariably going to be a little underwhelming, if not disappointing.
but i personally really enjoyed it nevertheless—perhaps even *because* it was so different from what i had expected (since, as i've already said, the synopsis didn't really speak to me anyway.)
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide, Grief, Death, and Mental illness
Moderate: Animal cruelty and Animal death