Reviews with content warning for Blood - Anansi Boys

It was a bit hard for me to get through, i didnt like the writing style much and (this is the nicest way i can say this) its very obviously written by a straight man. This would all be fine but

i have trouble getting over the fact that spider raped rosie and then they live happily wver after

i like the concept and honestly if woman weren't written how they are in the book id probably rate it a star higher. I dont believe the author intended to fall into misogynistic tropes but growing up in a sexist society he probably did it subconsciously. No hate just my opinion

Content Warnings

yrlaevelyn's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny informative lighthearted mysterious reflective

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

orlagal's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny hopeful lighthearted mysterious reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

eve_o's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny mysterious reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

Content Warnings

sauvageloup's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

tricky one to rate and i'm not sure how i feel about it really
[spoilers throughout]
Pros:
- the imagination of it really was excellent. the mythic gods were brilliantly described and creepy, with the Bird Woman lurking in the field from Charlie's train and generally being very spooky
- the characters were done well, especially Daisy and Maeve, I thought. they were brought in rather randomly and then woven in to be intricately part of the story and that was very effective and satisfying. Graham Coats was a convincing and awful villain, mundane enough to be realistic but still so uneasily disturbing at the same time. Him being the human equivalent of Tiger was clever and cool
- how the story all tied up was my favourite part, very satisfying. there was a great deal of character growth in Charlie and Spider, and to a lesser extent Rosie and Daisy too. Charlie and Spider's arc reminds me of the two sisters in that children's story I read - where one reckless sister learns to be more thoughtful, and the too-careful sister learns to be a little brave. they were two parts of the same whole (loved that reveal) and they needed to come together to balance each other out a bit.
- Charlie's magic coming into itself, and him becoming more confident with it, was great to see too. he had his own sort of magic, as long as he could believe in it he could make others believe it too. and i'm glad he wasn't totally healed, ie. he still got a bit of stage fright beforehand.
- in the interview questions, Gaiman says that he never intended for it to go as dark as it does with Maeve's muder, but I'm glad it did. I enjoyed the dark punch of the Bird Woman's sinister awfulness, Tiger's violence, and Graham being frighteningly terrible. it definitely upped the stakes and gave the book a real bite - the gods felt like convincingly powerful and also callous beings.

cons:
- so I hated the start and middle of this book. Charlie was painful to read, Spider I loathed and Rosie frustrated me (and continued to throughout the book). I understand that there was a satisfying arc for the brothers' characters and Spider definitely got his comeuppance, but I still wanted to DNF it because i was so fed up with them.
- and the biggest part of why I hated it, and the point that was never dealt with, was how Spider raped Rosie. She never wanted sex with Charlie and she knew him and planned to marry him. Spider had sex with her under false presences (legally rape) and using his "miracle" magic on her. He influences her to go away or do as he wishes with no compunction and there's no consequences for this except him being a bit sad he lost her for a spell. She slaps him and its forgotten about. Charlie also makes little to no effort to save Rosie from getting duped and influenced by Spider and is only pissed that *he's* losing his fiancée. he gives absolutely no shits that she, a woman who would never have had sex with Charlie when she's herself, got magicked into having sex. Really disgusting
- I know this was written in 2005, but there are some horrible little asides or so called jokes. One I remember was saying something derogatory about people who see things, ie. making a mean-spirited joke of schizophrenia, another about cross-dressing, and there were many other places I winced. Gaiman says Anansi is meant to be about 'the revenge of the weak', but the book is still cruel to people already trodden on by society, and it's treatment of Rosie was shit as hell
- Gaiman also says in the interview notes at the back that it's a comic book. I found very little in it funny. There was one point I chuckled and that was it, I think. the jokes just didn't land for me.

so... very mixed feelings. Hated the start and middle, but the end was very satisfying and I stayed up late to finish it.

Content Warnings

elizlizabeth's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny lighthearted mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

It's a Neil Gaiman book, I don't know what else you want me to say.

Content Warnings

bluejayreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

This book is listed as "American Gods #2," but the only thing it really has in common with American Gods is the idea that gods live among people and the god Anansi, who shows up briefly in American Gods and is the father who drops dead at the beginning of Anansi Boys. That's it.

Aside from Anansi/Mr. Nancy himself, there's a whole new cast of characters - Fat Charlie, his newly-discovered brother Spider, Charlie's fiance Rosie, Rosie's mother, Charlie's boss Grahame Coats, Daisy who gets involved purely by accident, and a few others with supporting roles who only show up briefly.

Before I go too much farther, this series of texts I sent to my husband pretty much sums up my experience reading this book.

Anansi Boys: Don't like the main character as much as I liked Shadow, but it's still pretty good

Towards the beginning, about an hour in

Anansi Boys update: I hate all these characters

Somewhere in the middle

Probably going to finish Anansi Boys after all, there's finally something interesting

About 70% in

Not nearly as good as American Gods

After finishing it

Shadow in American Gods wasn't really a fully fleshed-out character, but more of an audience surrogate that we could follow around through the world. The characters in Anansi Boys are a lot more fleshed out, and I disliked every single one of them.

Charlie was spineless, ambitionless, and upset that things in his life are going badly while at the same time doing next to nothing about them. You could probably find his picture in the dictionary next to the entry for "pusillanimous."
Spider is an asshole. He's an incredibly charming asshole, partly due to god-powers from being the son of a god, but he has no regard for other people's feelings. Not really in the sense that he enjoys hurting people, but more in that he'll take what he wants and it won't even cross his mind that other people might have feelings about it.
Rosie is a do-gooder in the most derogatory sense, the kind of person who wants to feel like she's helping people but she does the deciding about what helps and if it actually makes your situation worse, too bad, she thinks she did good and she's very proud of herself about it.
Rosie's mother is every evil mother-in-law and controlling mother stereotype and actually supposed to be unlikeable, so I don't feel too bad about disliking her.
Grahame Coats is a slimy weasel of a financial advisor and he's supposed to be unlikeable too.

To be fair, "I hate all these characters" was not entirely accurate. I didn't hate Daisy, but she wasn't in enough of the book for me to particularly like her, either. And Charlie had some major character growth in the last 15% of the book and ended up being not so bad. Spider also got better in the last 15%. Before that, though, it was a struggle. Spider shows up on Charlie's doorstep and decides he's going to live with him for a while, they clash and Rosie gets caught in the crossfire, Spider screws up Charlie's life, and about 60% through Charlie tries to find a magical way of throwing Spider out since non-magical ways weren't working and that's when things finally get going.

Women in general really get the short end of the stick in this book. There are some old ladies Charlie knew growing up who know things that might help but aren't telling him because reasons, there's Rosie's mother the horrid old crone, there's Rosie herself (who I'll talk about in just a second), and there's Daisy whose main role seems to be "Charlie's happy ending needs a girl and this one is convenient." Those are all the female characters in this book. The older women get some agency (even though it's to either be withholding information for who-knows-why or being a horrible and miserable person), but the two younger women don't. Rosie especially gets screwed over - Spider spends one day pretending to be Charlie, falls for Rosie, and uses his god powers to keep her thinking he's Charlie so he can keep having a relationship with her. There is absolutely rape by deception in this book, even though none of the characters seem to notice or care.

There are a few twists towards the end, and as I'd expect from Neil Gaiman they are pretty good. But they don't cover over the multitude of things I dislike in this book. I really only picked this up because A, my husband owned a copy, and B, I loved American Gods so much I was hoping for more. I did finish it, and the end was good, but I'm not really sure it was worth going through the beginning and the middle to get there.

Content Warnings

More...