Scan barcode
bookswithmybulldog's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal death, Infertility, Child death, Pregnancy, and Animal cruelty
Moderate: Medical content, Death of parent, Infidelity, Car accident, and Violence
Minor: Abortion
hollybearhouck's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Moderate: Violence and Miscarriage
Minor: Animal death, Car accident, Infertility, Abortion, Animal cruelty, Cancer, Fire/Fire injury, Pregnancy, and Cursing
bookishaddictions's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Miscarriage
Moderate: Animal death and Child death
Minor: Animal cruelty, Sexual content, and Abortion
nordstina's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty and Animal death
Moderate: Child death
Minor: Death
dwager's review
Graphic: Bullying, Miscarriage, Death, and Death of parent
Moderate: Animal death, Abortion, Infidelity, Racism, Animal cruelty, Injury/Injury detail, and Pregnancy
Minor: Cancer, Car accident, and Suicide
backpackingbookworm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
As anticipated, Damnation Spring was a sweeping saga that centred around the Gunderson's. Rich, an experienced tree-topper following in the footsteps of his father and grandfather (both of whom died on the job), has his eye on the 24/7 ridge - a sprawling mass of giant trees that would ensure he could provide for his wife and son well into the future. But when a growing group of tree huggers show up, Rich and his fellow loggers find themselves in jeopardy - without the trees, how will they survive? How will they feed their families? Logging is ingrained in their skin, tattooed into their calloused hands - it's all they have. With both sides explored, Davidson expertly tackles the themes of environmentalism, greed, and the impact of logging on families, the community, and health.
Firstly, the rich descriptions in this book were truly transportational - you could instantly picture yourself in each character's shoes, slogging through mud, catching your breath as a tree came crashing down, feeling the strength of the rushing water as you waded chest-deep into the creek. However, there is a line you can cross with descriptions where they become overkill and unfortunately it got to that point with this book. It felt so drawn out at times and I did consider DNFing on multiple occasions because nothing was happening other than what felt like redundant descriptions. It was the slowest burn I've read in a long time and I felt like I was slogging through mud A LOT, especially in the beginning. I'm not against slow burns, in fact, I love them, but there's they need to build tension and still feel relevant - too many parts felt mundane and could have easily been edited out without affecting the story. Add to that the heavy technical language and logging jargon that the reader is expected to pick up without explanation - it was a good job I read on my phone because I used the dictionary way more than normal.
I'm still giving four stars though (4.1 to be exact) because I did really enjoy the characterisation, the narrative and the themes. It was a really interesting read and tackled a lot of sensitive subjects. It reminded me of the way Jodi Picoult lays out her books - we hear from both sides of a controversial topic and we get more than one perspective, leading us to make our own decisions rather than being heavily guided by the author. I always appreciate that in a book, especially when it could be very easy to pick a side and focus on that.
Also 10/10 for a beautiful cover 😍
Rating breakdown
- Plot/narrative - 4.1
- Writing style/readability - 3.5
- Characters - 4.2
- Diverse themes - 4.3
- Ending - 4.2
Graphic: Miscarriage
Moderate: Animal death and Animal cruelty
sophiejohn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
The first thing I have to say about this book is that it is LONG. Way longer than necessary. Like the end just kept going and the first third of the book was very drawn out. The first third though, I get that. The worldbuilding in this was totally immersive, and it had to be because PNW logging culture in the 1970s is incredibly niche. So I think that the first third to half is a character study that provides the necessary context in the fall and early winter months to understand the nuances of the actions that the characters take when the plot starts to snowball in the late winter to spring-summer months.
Emotionally, this was a roller coaster. The writing was out of this world to me, but the cover looks way too happy for this ultimately devastating book.
also the dog stuff? fucked. sick in the head. my mental health during this book was hanging on the thread that is scout the dog, most tender and loyal hound, and Ash Davidson just snipped it (like that other dog's vocal cords 😳).</spoiler
Graphic: Animal death, Miscarriage, and Grief
Moderate: Blood and Animal cruelty
Minor: Colonisation
and_opossum's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Miscarriage, Racism, Violence, Pregnancy, Infertility, and Death
Moderate: Abortion, Animal death, Animal cruelty, Blood, Bullying, Car accident, Child death, Gun violence, Infidelity, and Medical content
rivbug27's review
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Blood, Bullying, Car accident, Colonisation, Violence, Racism, Pregnancy, Physical abuse, Miscarriage, and Medical trauma
Minor: Cultural appropriation, Cursing, Death, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Grief, Infidelity, Misogyny, Sexism, and Vomit
madtnation's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
Moderate: Death, Miscarriage, and Car accident
Minor: Abortion, Animal cruelty, and Animal death