Reviews

A Guilty Thing Surprised by Ruth Rendell

katieinca's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I started reading these because I wanted some cozy English mysteries. Rendell writes about manors and sherry and so on, but then we end up with things like unhinged repressed lesbians, knife-wielding sexual sadists, and wackadoodle incest affairs. These things wouldn't happen to Peter Wimsey! I don't think they'd even happen to Dalgliesh.
I'm not sure I'm complaining, per se, I've just been surprised.

laila4343's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Did NOT see that ending coming! I can't even tell you why I'm addicted to these Inspector Wexford mysteries, but I just really enjoy reading them. I guess they're my not-so-guilty pleasure.

emjay2021's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A perfectly fine mystery. The audiobook narrator was good, and the story clipped along at a satisfying pace. I had sort of figured it out partway through, but it wasn't super obvious at the beginning, and there were a few good red herrings in there.

emma_fukar's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

hpuphd's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This author sets an incredibly high standard with her many novels, and while this one may not be among her masterpieces, it is awfully good. Rendell excels at keeping the reader off balance in a pleasing way. You see that throughout this novel about a woman killed while on a late-night walk. All the things that come out when the police look into it . . . yikes! (The victim’s brother, who is a Wordsworth scholar, is a fine touch.)

davidlz1's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Not a bad read. Ms. Rendell apparently improves over time with each subsequent writing. One of the nice things about her writing style is that she incorporates a number of obscure adjectives which is wonderful in expanding one's vocabulary. The story itself was full of twists and turns. The ending was completely unexpected (at least by me) and it actually provoked a combination of sadness and repulsion at the same time. Definitely worth the read. A bonus in that it is a short novel which means it will not cannibalize all your time.

nichola's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

So I feel stupid about being so chuffed with this one but I pegged this one in about the first 20 pages. 

Not sure why, but I just knew. Maybe because the incest trope is so common in UK murder mysteries. *shrugs* 

Either, quite liked the possibility of guessing this one. Didn't love the narration about Wexford and the little Dutch girl. There were some very weird statements in there, which make me uncomfortable.

vsbedford's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Sets a great tone, but is a bit disappointing in the resolution of the central mystery. I'm always frustrated when a revelation arrives out of nowhere and the murderer revealed in the last chapter - though in this case, if the reader had familiarity with the life of Wordsworth the story may have resolved from the third chapter!

bucherca49's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Wordsworth's "Ode: Intimations of Immortality" provides the epigraph, title, and theme of this novel.

High instincts before which our mortal Nature
Did tremble like a guilty thing surprised:
But for those first affections,
Those shadowy recollections,
Which, be they what they may
Are yet the fountain-light of all our day, . . .

parablesarah's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.5

It is a tidy psychologically motivated mystery.