5wamp_creature's review

5.0

More of the human side of WW2 than other books I've read. Letters and other personal accounts put me there. Deep. Well researched. Fascinating/horrifying. Little to no discussion of troop movements and strategy. You might think it's long but none seemed unnecessary to me.

Very highly recommended.

xinganthony's review

5.0

A great assessment of the practicals of the War from a distance above the passions of ideals.

Pretty decent overview of WWII. my only complaint is that it can at times be too much of an overview, skipping a lot of the crucial events or not delving as deep as I would have liked into certain things. Hastings does a good job of putting forth the history in a very readable way. It's definitely not a dry or boring read. I liked it a lot but fell a bit short of loving it.

This book is huge, overwhelming, stuffed full of 658 pages of facts, and totally absorbing. It took me over a week to read it, but I'm glad I did. I am astonished at how much I did not know about WWII. I thought I was pretty widely read in the area for an American housewife. :-) But I discovered things constantly that I had NO IDEA about. 2 or 3 million Bengals starved to death in India because no one would send them food supplies to end a famine? Had NO idea. The war in northern Africa was more publicity-propaganda stunt than strategic advantage? Had not a clue. We really didn't need to invade Okinawa, the Philippines or Japan at all? Wow. And I knew that the Eastern Front was monumental in size to anything that happened in Western Europe. Really I did. I just had no idea of the magnitude, the scope of Russian suffering, the paltry insignificance of anything contributed by Americans. The author seems very middle-of-the-road politically, sometimes excoriating Roosevelt and Churchill for cynicism and manipulation but in all believing the "standard story" that the war had to be fought, the US had to be involved, and it's a good thing we did it. (He blew off with one dismissive sentence any idea that Roosevelt manipulated us into Pearl Harbor.) But in all I enjoyed this very much; I especially appreciated the quotes from real people of nearly every place and part of the war telling about their experiences. If someone wants an overview of the entire huge war, this would seem to me to be a pretty good place to start.

Inferno is similar to the last [a:Max Hastings|31233|Max Hastings|http://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1269308046p2/31233.jpg] book I read, [b:Retribution: The Battle for Japan, 1944-45|1960034|Retribution The Battle for Japan, 1944-45|Max Hastings|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1320531980s/1960034.jpg|1963073]. It's an overall history of WWII, covering all theaters, although spending more time in Europe (both Eastern and Western fronts) than any other. Like Inferno, it's not really a military history--while the book necessarily revolves around campaigns and battles, it doesn't go into depth--this book is more about the attitudes and political environments of both sides in the war. The author seeds the book liberally with first-hand accounts taken from original source material.

The book was a long read, but was very good. I especially appreciated the attention the author paid to home-front issues, such as the "Rosie the Riveter" effect, or the trials of civilians and soldiers in Budapest. It's always great to read WWII history that isn't part of the standard narrative.

Overall hugely informative and very interesting. Anyone interested in WWII should read it.

Nice broad overview of WWII. I wanted more detail on some critical events, but it's hard to put too much detail into one book. I liked how he talked about the conflict from the point of view of the victims you don't hear much about. Millions of people were affected by this horrible worldwide event. The U.S. was one of the least affected in terms of casualties. Interesting book for those not that familiar with the history of World War II--or those who just think they are.

This history of the Second World War focuses less on the sweep of events and more on their effects upon individuals and their perceptions of events. If you are interested in WW II this does provide a unique point of view. By focusing on the concerns of individuals, Hastings manages to bring home the horrific costs of the war, particularly the high cost in lives lost in Eastern Europe. He also provides some interesting identification of key strategic elements of the war as compared to some of the more well-known. For example, among the more strategically important factors were:


- American use of submarines to destroy Japanese shipping lines (far more important than the "Battle for the Atlantic")
- Germany's blunder in engaging in strategic bombing of Britain, perhaps the only arena of battle in which the English could prevail in 1940.
- The extraordinary willingness of Russia to accept (and use) mass casualties in battle in the service of tactical and strategic objectives as compared to the U.S. or U.K.

Finally, although the Holocaust itself is not an area of particular emphasis, I found his documentation of the depth and breadth of anti-Semitism to be a poignant reminder of our continuing struggles with religious, racial, and cultural intolerance. Their pursuit of a "Final Solution" to the detriment of a war effort that was obviously struggling from 1942 onwards beggars any rational explanation. And lest we forget, every single country (Denmark excepted) gave up their Jews to be interned, converted to slave labor, and killed. Nor does the U.S. escape some measure of culpability

When Americans were polled in November 1938 about whether they believed Jewish fugitives from Hitler should be granted special immigration rights to enter the United States, 23 percent said yes, 77 percent no.

It is perhaps of measure of progress that recent polls indicate Americans reject allowing Syrian refugees fleeing conflict and persecution, albeit by a narrower margin (56% to 41%).


Wow.