absolutely enjoyable

* 2.5 Stars *

I already find conan-doyle's work a little hard to read and the short story format made it even worst. The story's were enjoyable but felt like they were in a rush to finish.

I do think that may have rated the book a little low, but it doesn't reach 3 stars for me. Maybe a 2.5.
While there were 12 different cases in this book, at least the first five pages of every single one was the same. The way a client arrived, where they sat, what Watson did, what Sherlock Holmes said. Now while I understand that this was an attempt to showcase a routine, but it was too much. And the cases themselves were somewhat poorly told. We don't see any kind of evidence until Sherlock points them out, while some are not things only he would notice. So in a lot of ways, the reader is stuck in the dark until the entire thing is explained by Holmes, which I think takes the fun of these things out of the book. The book would be so enjoyable if it were more generous in providing details and letting the reader have their own go before everything was explained. This is attempted throughout the book, but it's worked only a handful of times. Like in the case "A CASE OF IDENTITY" or "THE BOSCOMBE VALLEY MYSTERY". These two were my favourites of the book.
All in all, I wouldn't say it was a bad book, just maybe not a book for nowaday mystery readers. It is rather old and it is perfect in many ways for its own time.

I really enjoyed this. There’s something very cosy and homely about the world of Baker Street. And despite being so short they’re excellently crafted to keep your attention.
adventurous mysterious reflective relaxing slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous funny informative mysterious relaxing tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous funny mysterious relaxing fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous mysterious relaxing medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Yo siempre, siempre, siempre voy a amar a Sherlock a través de los ojos de Watson.

Mis favoritos:
- Escándalo en Bohemia
- Un caso de identidad
- La banda de lunares
- El aristócrata solterón

P.S. Esto va a arruinar mis stats, porque lo empecé en Septiembre 2024, leí la mitad. Lo dejé sólo todo este tiempo, y ahora lo acabé en dos días.
adventurous dark informative mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes