Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.17 AVERAGE
3.17 AVERAGE
read this for uni, i thought it was very interesting regarding colonialism and religion
adventurous
slow-paced
Okay, so Crusoe would be in no way a sympathetic or likable character by modern standards (you'd hope anyway). He's an asshole, to put it simply.
Worth reading if you are interested in the development of the novel in English or similar subjects, otherwise, if you can stomach the racism, slavery, misogyny, moralising and sanctimonious philosophising, there are a few good bits.
Worth reading if you are interested in the development of the novel in English or similar subjects, otherwise, if you can stomach the racism, slavery, misogyny, moralising and sanctimonious philosophising, there are a few good bits.
Sebenernya baca buku yang terbitannya Balai Pustaka, tahun 1982.
daaaaan...
seperti biasanya:
*drum rolls*
TERJEMAHANNYA ITU LOOOH!!!
(terpaksa pake caps lock, maaph)
Baru baca 3 halaman pertama rasanya hati kayak diiris-iris pake silet tumpul, dilumurin jeruk nipis, ditaburin garam, dibakar, dimakan pake kecap dan saos sambel botolan.
Tapi..
GOD BLESS GOODREADS! GOD BLESS OTIS!
ternyata ada versi e-book yang bisa diunduh uh uh di goodreads!!
iyeiyy!
daaaaan...
seperti biasanya:
*drum rolls*
TERJEMAHANNYA ITU LOOOH!!!
(terpaksa pake caps lock, maaph)
Baru baca 3 halaman pertama rasanya hati kayak diiris-iris pake silet tumpul, dilumurin jeruk nipis, ditaburin garam, dibakar, dimakan pake kecap dan saos sambel botolan.
Tapi..
GOD BLESS GOODREADS! GOD BLESS OTIS!
ternyata ada versi e-book yang bisa diunduh uh uh di goodreads!!
iyeiyy!
adventurous
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
I think this is a book that will always be for more influential than it is nice to read in modern times.
I can appreciate the impact this had on modern literature as a whole while also recognizing this book can be a bit of a slog to get there. In particular the middle.
I was happy with it in the beginning, my attention slowly began to wane and in the middle it was a straight up chore to get there. For the last 30% or so it does redeem itself and become wildly more interesting (only judging by this book’s standards) and I felt it ended at the strongest point in the novel. That being said, as a whole, I never thought that an adventure novel aboutsailing, getting taken as a space, escaping, getting shipwrecked, surviving, running into cannibals, and mutineers, and fighting off bears and wolves could be so utterly boring at times that I would struggle to make it through but here we are.
It’s written in a diary format which I soon grew tired of but I found it did have some charms.
To me the most interesting part of the novel was his spiritual journey along the way. He wrestles with questions of the soul and I can appreciate that even over 300 years later.
That being said, can I say I recommend this book? No, not really. The only way I would is if someone is really into classic literature and wants to complete it then dig in. I don’t mind the story and its influence is undeniable but it’s a bit of a slog for the modern reader. I’m glad I read it to say I’ve read it but I won’t be returning or reading on to the sequels.
I can appreciate the impact this had on modern literature as a whole while also recognizing this book can be a bit of a slog to get there. In particular the middle.
I was happy with it in the beginning, my attention slowly began to wane and in the middle it was a straight up chore to get there. For the last 30% or so it does redeem itself and become wildly more interesting (only judging by this book’s standards) and I felt it ended at the strongest point in the novel. That being said, as a whole, I never thought that an adventure novel about
It’s written in a diary format which I soon grew tired of but I found it did have some charms.
To me the most interesting part of the novel was his spiritual journey along the way. He wrestles with questions of the soul and I can appreciate that even over 300 years later.
That being said, can I say I recommend this book? No, not really. The only way I would is if someone is really into classic literature and wants to complete it then dig in. I don’t mind the story and its influence is undeniable but it’s a bit of a slog for the modern reader. I’m glad I read it to say I’ve read it but I won’t be returning or reading on to the sequels.
adventurous
lighthearted
relaxing
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
adventurous
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I see the value in a historical context, but it just isn't a book that speaks to me.
adventurous
lighthearted
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
2 1/2 stars. There are two main ways I could view [b:Robinson Crusoe|2932|Robinson Crusoe|Daniel Defoe|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1403180114s/2932.jpg|604666] - firstly, as a reader who reads for enjoyment and entertainment, and secondly, as someone offering a more critical analysis of historical attitudes. To be honest, though, the book doesn't fare too well under either microscope.
As a novel for enjoyment, it's about the titular character being shipwrecked on an island many believe to be based on Tobago, near Trinidad. There's a whole lot of survival skills going on (but a modern reader will likely have read more compelling accounts of survival) and Crusoe finds himself facing native cannibals and captives. The style is distant and emotionless, only marginally more readable than Swift's [b:Gulliver's Travels|7733|Gulliver's Travels|Jonathan Swift|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1427829692s/7733.jpg|2394716], but that is largely due to the more simplistic narrative.
The parts where Crusoe turns to his knowledge of European agriculture to survive are particularly tedious for any reader not interested in production theory, trade and economics.
Looking at this book through the eyes of history, it's something of an advocate for colonialism and European superiority. Crusoe arrives on this island and quickly attempts to adjust it to his own expectations of civilization, even to the point of wanting the prisoners as slaves. It should also be pointed out that Crusoe is shipwrecked during a voyage to acquire African slaves. He survives by using his European knowledge, adapting very little, killing off natives, and embracing Christianity.
Crusoe is the intelligent European and the natives, including his one friend - Friday, are savages. He becomes a "king" figure of this "colony" and the conclusion appears to be that he brings civilization to these backward peoples. Perhaps interesting as a view of European mentality in the 18th century, but frankly quite nauseating to sit through today.
Blog | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Youtube | Store
As a novel for enjoyment, it's about the titular character being shipwrecked on an island many believe to be based on Tobago, near Trinidad. There's a whole lot of survival skills going on (but a modern reader will likely have read more compelling accounts of survival) and Crusoe finds himself facing native cannibals and captives. The style is distant and emotionless, only marginally more readable than Swift's [b:Gulliver's Travels|7733|Gulliver's Travels|Jonathan Swift|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1427829692s/7733.jpg|2394716], but that is largely due to the more simplistic narrative.
The parts where Crusoe turns to his knowledge of European agriculture to survive are particularly tedious for any reader not interested in production theory, trade and economics.
Looking at this book through the eyes of history, it's something of an advocate for colonialism and European superiority. Crusoe arrives on this island and quickly attempts to adjust it to his own expectations of civilization, even to the point of wanting the prisoners as slaves. It should also be pointed out that Crusoe is shipwrecked during a voyage to acquire African slaves. He survives by using his European knowledge, adapting very little, killing off natives, and embracing Christianity.
Crusoe is the intelligent European and the natives, including his one friend - Friday, are savages. He becomes a "king" figure of this "colony" and the conclusion appears to be that he brings civilization to these backward peoples. Perhaps interesting as a view of European mentality in the 18th century, but frankly quite nauseating to sit through today.
Blog | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Youtube | Store