Reviews

Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics by Richard H. Thaler

jurgenappelo's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Insightful, inspiring and funny.

harryd's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny informative medium-paced

4.5

agnesperdita's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

3.0

alexriabtsev's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Чудова книга для розширення свiтогляду з сучасноï економіки!

mooseformayor's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

one of the best books so far in 2017

niharikaaaaaa9's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A fascinating book about the field of behavioral economics, though it was a little dry at times. I appreciated that Thaler had a good combination of anecdotes and data to prove his points, and described both in a way that didn't require a PhD in economics to understand. While many of the insights from the experiments he ran were interesting, what I found most captivating was the last section of the book, in which Thaler describes "nudging" and shows real world examples about the effects that it had. Overall, a good introduction to behavioral economics for someone (me) who knows very little about the field.

robthereader's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Written as a reflective journal through Thaler’s career, Misbehaving lays out the ascent of behavioral economics with anecdotes and breakthroughs. Thaler and his renegade colleagues are met with opposition to their unorthodox of applying social science principles and research by traditional normative economists who insist markets are dominated by logical axioms. Where Thaler does not necessarily disagree that markets would be best run if they followed these exulted ideas, he does disagree in that they do not accurately reflect how humans, not their theoretical counterparts, Econs, actually make fiscal decisions.

The format of the book details Thaler’s humble starts as a self described lazy graduate student through his chance encounters with expert psychologists who steer his career in the direction of challenging the long accepted tenets of economics through first identifying irregularities that are supposedly irrelevant factors (SIF). This leads to conversing with further experts and then conferences and papers that successfully inject fresh ideas into the status quo.

As a novel economics writer, I did not take interest in Thaler’s long exposes on the quirky characters and stars of economics. In fact, I thought of demoting my rating until the end when he does his best writing in connecting real solutions to real problems with the principles of behavioral economics. His writing does however add to his style and allows the reader to develop further interest if they can get through the first few sections.

All in all, I enjoyed his introductions and clarifications to economics and finance topics. In particular, he does a good job of illustrating prospect theory as sort of the scientific process of economics. His recommendations for opt out retirement plans, preferred drafting and hiring strategies and office layouts all make for simple reminders on what drives human decisions. Having read this book, I look forward to reading his more acclaimed book, Nudge, which I suspect will follow a writing pattern more similar to the end of this novel rather than its beginning.

caputon's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Solid, though not as rigorous as I would have liked.

cmhowa03's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This book is more focused on economics than behavior, but an easy read if you are into economics.

sharrypdx's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

An introduction to Behavioral Economics by one one the people who helped create the discipline. This book accounts the making of Behavioral Economics. Very interesting.

His distinction between “Econs” and “Humans” is insightful. Of course, after many years of my own observation and study, I find it hard to believe that anyone could continue to trust the “invisible hand” theory which relies upon rational agents to make decisions about control of the market. Those theories simply don’t hold up under real conditions.