Reviews tagging 'Mental illness'

Jumalat juhlivat öisin by Donna Tartt

377 reviews

annadelph's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ruusaer's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rachelnoel's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

moonbeamdmercutio's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

One of my favorite books of all time. Annoying before you realize that it's a satire on the author's past experiences and then it becomes insanely enjoyable. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

the_cat_of_mishief's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kimveach's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

This book is hard to review and equally hard to rate.  I both liked it and was annoyed by it.  It was slowly paced, but the further I got into the book, the more I wanted to finish it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kshy's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jojo_fiction_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

 The Secret History by Donna Tartt
5/5 Stars


When Richard arrives at Hampden, a college in New England, to continue his education, he is instantly intrigued by a small group of other students. Isolated from the others, these students studied Greek under the eclectic Professor Julian. As Richard joins the group, disregarding the other students at his school and the “normal” way of life, he is brought into the world of aestheticized academia in a way he had never experienced before. Which led him down a path that resulted in more death and tragedy than he could have ever expected. 

I went into this book with pretty high expectations. It seems that every time fall comes around the genre of Dark Academia comes with it, and at the forefront of the books that are recommended is The Secret History.

And I was not disappointed! From its beautiful writing style, to its suspense and mystery, to its pretentious characters, every part of this book had me wanting more. I am always a sucker for unreliable narrators and Richard truly delivers that. Half the time he's on drugs or he's ill, or just not privy to information, or he is intentionally making himself seem to be simply an observer. But how uninvolved he really is, is up for debate. 

This book pokes fun at those aspects of academia that are prevalent, especially in the liberal arts and classical studies. This sense of personal superiority over one’s peers with nothing backing up that claim. These unlikable characters somehow worm their way into our hearts to the point that we start to have pity on them, only for something to happen that slaps us with the reality of their awfulness. The suspense builds slowly, and the ending is the actualization of all the characters' worst fears. In the end, they are nothing but a group of mediocre students pretending that they were on the same level as the ancient Greeks, and then, like a Greek tragedy, they become the things they hated or feared the most. 

There is a comical amount of contradiction within this book between the characters' views of themselves vs how they really are. They talk about comparing themselves to the Greeks, to the philosophers and poets. They talk of rituals and wealth. But they drink champagne out of a teapot and eat maraschino cherries out of the jar. Richard himself says that he has always been drawn to the sublime, beauty, the aesthetic…yet he does coke in a burger king parking lot, and gets drunk at college parties, like many other young adults would in university. Appearing to be smart and wealthy is the goal of these students, but one refuses to do the SAT because it doesn't fit his aesthetic, and none of them are actually concerned when it comes to their grades, they only tried so hard in order to win the praise of their professor, whom in their eyes, is the peak of authority and aesthetic appreciation. All of this showing the difference between their make believe ideas vs the real world.


This book has many amazing themes, like obsession, isolation, social class, beauty, and it is a good critique of the elitist attitude that can occur in academia. While I don't think it perfectly encapsulated all the issues that can be found (only a brief glimpse into the issue of sexism, and no mention of racism in academia), its place as one of the most influential books within the dark academia genre is well deserved, and has paved the way for many more books with more in depth themes and critiques to be made. 

A sign of a good book for me is how often I think about it. If you want to read a book that sticks with you, for days or weeks after you finish, this is the book for you. I have not stopped thinking about it or talking to my friends about it since I finished it. Although I will say if you don't like books with long chapters, this might not be the best. I was surprised that this book only contained 8 chapters and is approx 559 pages. 

Other books that I have been told are similar in themes and style are If We Were Villains by M.L Rio and Babel by R.F. Kuang, so those are being added to my to-be-read pile immediately. And I'm planning on scouring my local bookstores for any more books by Donna Tartt. With The Secret History being an easy 5 stars for me I'm sure the rest of her books will blow me away as well. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jkull_10's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jasminn_perez's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

I think I would love to reread this book. I just know its gonna take another pass through for anything to really stick. I have so much appreciation for the character writing and just the writing in general. donna tart is the most genius like actually. I at this point in time don't believe I truly grasped a lot of what was going on in this book. but that might be the point ? idk I might come back to add to this review later bc I literally just finished it. I loved how much of an unreliable narrator Richard was. it truly was his story and his side of it and I know he liiiiied. the main hype for this book was the vibes and TRUST they are there. it did invent dark academia. its dark and mysterious and eerie and I felt so uncomfortable throughout so much of it. the way that Richard was kind of always on the outside of the group until he wasn't translated so so well onto the reader. it really felt like I was there with them but only on the level that he was. because even after they killed bunny it still felt like he was on the outside in a way. idk anyway it was good I will def be rereading and maybe ill grasp it better then.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings