Scan barcode
dharma_s's review against another edition
4.0
This was just so beautifully written. The mastery McEwan had over the language in this book is incredible, and I felt so deeply for each of the characters.
imjustaboat's review against another edition
reflective
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This review contains unmarked spoilers.
Absolutely brilliant. I loved every sentence, perfect and formed meticulously. There are two major things I want to focus on while writing this review: Technique and Plot & Characters (though what is a book without those factors?).
Absolutely brilliant. I loved every sentence, perfect and formed meticulously. There are two major things I want to focus on while writing this review: Technique and Plot & Characters (though what is a book without those factors?).
Technique
As said by Ian McEwan, "[Atonement]'s really a book for other writers about reading and writing." Guess what, I'm a writer! This sums up why I was so drawn to a book that I wouldn't have spared a second glance at on any other day (thank you Laufey book club). The observations offered on writing intrigued me, and I sped through the pages faster than I normally would have with a book that has such acute descriptions. (Possibly also why I found Briony's point-of-views more enticing than the others. More on that later.) Every layer crafts a masterpiece that's one of the best books I'll read. However, if you stripped away all the book contains to the backbone, you would still find an enthralling novel on love, war, guilt, and forgiveness. "Atonement engages the reader on every conceivable level, with an ease and authority that mark is as a genuine masterpiece."
In the novel, Briony receives criticism on her writing, or makes her own comments, and leaves you suspicious that the writing being written about (lol) is too similar to the style of the actual text. I wondered if the author was critiquing his own writing by inserting himself into Briony. I even made the remark, "Ian McEwan definitely reads dictionaries for fun." Now, all this could be a little true, especially because this is the first work I've read by McEwan and I don't know what his style of writing is, but the feeling I had when I reached the final part and learned it was actually Briony's writing was delight. McEwan leaves hints that it is in fact Briony's writing, in everything about her fictional novel "Two Figures by a Fountain".
I've talked to some people that said they didn't like the book because of the writing style, but personally I loved the descriptions and characters, so to each their own.
Plot and Characters
Even without all the wonderful writing, the plot itself is so compelling. For me, Briony and Cecelia were the most relatable. (Part Two dragged on a bit because I didn't find Robbie that relatable, though.) I know Briony is made out as unlikeable (like damn, let your sister and her lover sext in peace), and although I wouldn't even think about doing what she did (as someone similar in age), I found her parts to be the most intriguing, especially when her writing was mentioned. As a writer myself, these were when I enjoyed the book the most. I also found a lot of parts of Cecelia's character relatable, although more so in Part One than Parts Two and Three. Having interesting characters (even if they're majorly flawed, or especially) is the most important part of a piece of writing for me. I've never read Virginia Woolf, but the descriptions about how she writes about/in streams of consciousness fascinated me (and Briony's Virginia Woolf stan era was great!), because her plots are described as perceptions and internal journeys, basically, wowie. But I digress.
Revisiting the Vulture review, Atonement's "got the three elements that make it a must: a country house, the Second World War, a love affair." I won't lie, the plot is one of the less captivating things about the book, and may steer some people away. It's pretty slow-paced, and contains a lot about war, which is, quite frankly, depressing. However, (in my humble opinion,) that makes the novel all the more better, powerful. Also I shed a tear or two on the last page of Part One and that should count for something!
Overall, I LOVE this book! I'm definitely watching the movie and reading other novels by Ian McEwan :D I'll be thinking about the characters long after today for sure, and I believe the observations and critiques on writing have in turn helped me become a better writer. Atonement will have a lasting impact on me.
P.S. My original review for this was going to be "what a bunch of prudes" before I got emotional over the final pages of Part Three and read the 1999 part (ew, who thinks of a review before finishing the last page?) and I just wanted to share because I thought it was kinda funny-ish 😓
ejpaskey's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Good book, obviously very sad. I liked the complexity of the plot but disliked the long, tangental descriptions of scenery and other irrelevant details throughout the book. The writing style is very clearly a man who thinks he will somehow be the next Jane Austen which I wasn't a fan of but overall the story was still good and worth reading.
frankikaos's review against another edition
4.0
So... It's taken me a year to actually read this book. There isn't any bad reason behind it, I just found it hard to get into the first time round then gave up and revisited many other stories and discovered even more before, finally, being handed the book by my boyfriend when I asked him to pick me something at random to read. So I got to it and I have to admit that, now, I have no idea why I struggled with it so much the first time around!
Granted, I wouldn't class this as one of ny favourite booms but I would say that it's definitely a book you need to read- it's such a brilliant story and I just can't see how the film could do it's wonderful descriptions any justice.
The best (and worst) thing about the book is that you, the reader, can already read into the events- especially the ones in the first part of the book, the main story -and the more you realise what's actually happening and the more you see the mistakes made by others, the more you feel for Robbie and Cecilia.
I'm not a fan of romantic fiction but this story isn't a love story- it's a story about love. The young lovers suddenly realise their attraction, the imaginitive teenager conjures up a fantasy on which she has to save the sister she loves so much... No one sets out to do any bad in this novel (bar one character who will remain unnamed lest it spoil the story) but so much bad, so much distress and heartbreak, is caused regardless.
I am glad I got around to reading this book eventually and I would definitely recommend it.
Granted, I wouldn't class this as one of ny favourite booms but I would say that it's definitely a book you need to read- it's such a brilliant story and I just can't see how the film could do it's wonderful descriptions any justice.
The best (and worst) thing about the book is that you, the reader, can already read into the events- especially the ones in the first part of the book, the main story -and the more you realise what's actually happening and the more you see the mistakes made by others, the more you feel for Robbie and Cecilia.
I'm not a fan of romantic fiction but this story isn't a love story- it's a story about love. The young lovers suddenly realise their attraction, the imaginitive teenager conjures up a fantasy on which she has to save the sister she loves so much... No one sets out to do any bad in this novel (bar one character who will remain unnamed lest it spoil the story) but so much bad, so much distress and heartbreak, is caused regardless.
I am glad I got around to reading this book eventually and I would definitely recommend it.
leonie_grawehr's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75