Reviews

Re: Colonised Planet 5, Shikasta by Doris Lessing

nikolai_k's review

Go to review page

1.0

Maximum Tedium

(DNF)

faintgirl's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

As an academic exercise, Shikasta is extraordinary. As a novel, I've got to admit it was hard going. It imagines that evolution on earth was coerced at every stage by the interference of beings from another planet. As part of an experiment in colonizing new planets, they directed every stage of our development from the early humans to the Century of Destruction, beginning with World War I. It has huge amounts to say about the rule of white races over darker ones for much of our modern history, is ridiculously prescient when it comes to talking about the future world economy and even to some extent, the effect of social media as propaganda tool. But my word...it reads like a lab book at some points. I get it, I get it, that's the whole point, this whole planet that means everything to us is little more than an experiment in the eyes of being detached from it. But I feel like I could read the lab books running up to the discovery that neurons communicate with both chemicals and electricity (RIP Professor Paul Greengard, incredible person, huge loss) and to be honest, it would be a bit dull till I sat back and pondered and exactly what that meant. This piece is a triumph, but it didn't grip me as a work of literature. I'm not sure I've ever felt quite that way about a book before.

arrienne's review

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.0

sam_bizar_wilcox's review

Go to review page

5.0

There's really nothing else like it. I revisited Shikasta wondering if its unusual structure, its otherworldly framing, and its spiritualist/sufiist undercurrents would hold up now that I'm (marginally) more familiar with postmodern literature. And it still stuns.

Lessing writes a novel that achieves monumental greatness as its colossal scope and ambition allow for rich, profound critique of 20th century culture and society. The novel itself, conceived as an assemblage of artefacts, defies classification. Lessing addresses her contemporary subjects obliquely, the multifold texture of her writing and the speculative fiction aspects of the novel allow refract the angle of her judgment. But judge she does. And often with more aplomb and precision than she is given credit for (a tall order: Lessing was, after all, a Nobel laureate).

In truth, there's no way to fully review or apprehend this novel. It exists as a sort of experiment that upends expectations of serious fiction, science fiction, philosophy, religion, and art. It is a deeply political text - that is clear - but what else it is, well, it's impossible to say. Shikasta is a chimera, a vividly evolving mosiac that can only be experienced...and experienced again.

paromita_m's review against another edition

Go to review page

Dullest thing I have read in SF at least. I think if I continued, I would lose the will to exist so DNF. 

sarihelikopter's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Yorum yapmak için birkaç saat düşünmek istedim önce, şimdi toparladım fikirlerimi.

Öncelikle ben bir Doris Lessing hayranıyım, onu söylemem lazım. Lakin bilim-kurgularından hiç okumamıştım daha önce. Beşinci Çocuk, Büyükanneler, İyi Terörist gibi kitapları benim tüm zamanlar favorilerimde illa yer buluyor kendine.

Özellikle bilim-kurgularından birine başlamak istedim. Başlangıçta okuduğum her şeyden çok keyif aldım. Kırkyama gibi bir kitap. Gerçekten arşiv belgelerinin art arda dizilmesinden oluşuyor, alışık olduğumuz gibi bir plot yok. Daha önceden karşılaştığım "insanlıktan önceki kadim güçler" üzerine kurulu bir alternatif dünya yaratılış hikayesi var burda da. Yetkin ve kadim güçlerin elini çekmesiyle ya da bir şekilde bağlarının kopmasıyla açıklıyor dünyanın bugünkü halini. Bu kısımlar, dünyaya görevli olarak gönderilmiş bu kadim kişilerden birinin raporları hep.

Daha sonra dünyanın bugününden kişilerin günlükleri ve mektuplarına geçiyoruz. O noktada hikaye Lessing'in marksizm ve sufizm arasında bir yerlerde duran dünya görüşüne kayıyor. Bana kalırsa ikinci kısım bilim kurgunun artık sadece bir araca dönüştüğü kısım, çünkü oradaki perspektifini bilim kurgu olmayan kitaplarında da görüyoruz zaten yer yer. Yazarı tanıyan biri için bazen tekrar gibi olsa da, tanımayanlar için iyi bir giriş olurmuş orası ayrı.

Yarı çok memnun, yarı memnuniyetsiz kapadım kitabı. Ama seriyi okumaya devam edicem. Özellikle Evlilikler isimli ikinci kitabı çok merak ediyorum.

senthil_krishna's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

terrypaulpearce's review

Go to review page

3.0

I eventually gave up on this one. It had some great ideas, but by about a third of the way through I felt I'd absorbed them, and the style, while beautiful occasionally, was often dry and slightly alienating. Which I guess was maybe the effect she was going for to some extent -- it's supposed to be a collection of reports and found notes about Earth written by another race whose minds are on higher levels, but it got quite tedious to read. As contrast I read A Canticle for Liebowitz straight afterwards, which has some similar values and is similarly aged classic sci-fi, but has aged very much better, I found.

fayalite's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.0

ebokhyllami's review

Go to review page

2.0

I am done.. Nå trengs noe som bygger opp leselysten igjen! Nuff said.