Reviews

Delta of Venus by Anaïs Nin

cbxtherine's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

if you weren’t into women before reading this, you will be after you’ve finished it [speaking from experience]

abbyistrying's review against another edition

Go to review page

Eve needed it back and I cba to chase up a new copy.

lorydory's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

sallysivan's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

doggerdog's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot

5.0

“…We reviled him, because he almost caused us to take vows of chastity, because what he wanted us to exclude was our own aphrodisiac - poetry.”
- Anaïs Nin, December, 1940

Despite being forced to subdue the “language of sex” by her client, as she states in the postscript, Nin’s voice as a sexually embodied woman is still prevalent throughout her stories. Allowing her to often beautifully express the dichotomy of woman’s sensuality: to be loved/worshipped and to be ravished. 

These two sides of sensuality can also be divided into gendered categories, with the former largely being represented as a traditionally female perspective in literature (especially in the 1940s). Whereas the latter appeals heavily to men, and has been bastardised within culture as an act that only involves the man taking pleasure, without understanding the nuances of the act that allow women to seek out this form of sex. To be ravished is to be worshipped. To be ravished is to be loved.

In some of these stories, we see Nin be influenced by her client, taking a more male approach to the idea of ravishing women, in a way that is almost tongue and cheek to the women reading. Whilst it may seem undoubtedly erotic and factual to some men reading (particularly contextual men). They want to take from us, that’s the role we serve in sex. Yet Nin still plays with this idea even in these moments, using language to suggest that these women are enjoying this merely because they were worshipped prior to this act. Nin let’s us know that this dichotomy is symbiotic. A woman will not let you ravish her if you do not court her.

egomaxima's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Not even slightly erotic, but surprisingly witty. Love how the characters from one story reappear in others down the line. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

itsprobable's review against another edition

Go to review page

tried to give it a chance but I just can't handle it. I likd the backstory of this more than the actual thing. I don't think it's the author herself just the content (see warnings). I think I'll try another one of her books though because the little preface from her diary was quite interesting

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

apleiades17's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

"Talking together is a form of intercourse."

jediprincess's review against another edition

Go to review page

Read the content warnings… too much for me

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mednyaan's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75