You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.84 AVERAGE
3.84 AVERAGE
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
sad
medium-paced
challenging
dark
informative
medium-paced
dark
informative
mysterious
sad
medium-paced
challenging
dark
informative
sad
medium-paced
dark
tense
As a true crime enthusiast, I was immediately intrigued by the premise of Murderland. I’ll read just about anything that dives into serial killers and their actions, and this book promised an interesting twist: the idea that industrial lead pollution in the Pacific Northwest could help explain why so many notorious killers emerged from the region in the 1970s and ’80s. Unfortunately, while the theory is compelling on the surface, the book ultimately falls short of delivering.
Murderland is broken into three topics throughout the entire book. The primary focus of Murderland was on the retelling of infamous cases like those of Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgway, and others. Caroline Fraser details stories about both the killers and their victims. The secondary focus is of Caroline's theory that lead poisoning and other heavy metal exposure fueled the rise of serial killers in the Pacific Northwest during that time period. The third focus, and the less interesting parts of the book, are about Caroline herself during this time period.
The ultimate problem with Murderland is that the book was having an identity crisis. It attempts to function as a scientific analysis, a true crime narrative, and a memoir all at once, and the result feels scattered. The central theory about lead poisoning remains just that, a theory. Caroline provides no hard evidence, comparative data, or broader analysis to support her claims. Her theory raises questions such as why this would only affect a handful of men and why women and other regions did not have a similar impact. These questions and more were left unanswered. Caroline's argument ultimately comes across as speculative rather than scientific.
Additionally, the memoir elements throughout the book don't help. Since Murderland wasn't marketed as a memoir, the personal anecdotes feel disconnected from the book’s premise. At best, they offer a glimpse into life in the Pacific Northwest during the 70s and 80s, but they add little to the larger discussion of serial killers or the pollution theory.
For me, the strongest parts of Murderland were the true crime sections, where Caroline recounts the crimes and lives of the killers and their victims. Beyond that, the book felt unfocused and unfinished.
In the end, Murderland raises an intriguing question but fails to provide convincing answers. True crime fans may appreciate the killer profiles, but readers looking for a well-supported exploration of the pollution-violence connection will likely walk away disappointed.
Murderland is broken into three topics throughout the entire book. The primary focus of Murderland was on the retelling of infamous cases like those of Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgway, and others. Caroline Fraser details stories about both the killers and their victims. The secondary focus is of Caroline's theory that lead poisoning and other heavy metal exposure fueled the rise of serial killers in the Pacific Northwest during that time period. The third focus, and the less interesting parts of the book, are about Caroline herself during this time period.
The ultimate problem with Murderland is that the book was having an identity crisis. It attempts to function as a scientific analysis, a true crime narrative, and a memoir all at once, and the result feels scattered. The central theory about lead poisoning remains just that, a theory. Caroline provides no hard evidence, comparative data, or broader analysis to support her claims. Her theory raises questions such as why this would only affect a handful of men and why women and other regions did not have a similar impact. These questions and more were left unanswered. Caroline's argument ultimately comes across as speculative rather than scientific.
Additionally, the memoir elements throughout the book don't help. Since Murderland wasn't marketed as a memoir, the personal anecdotes feel disconnected from the book’s premise. At best, they offer a glimpse into life in the Pacific Northwest during the 70s and 80s, but they add little to the larger discussion of serial killers or the pollution theory.
For me, the strongest parts of Murderland were the true crime sections, where Caroline recounts the crimes and lives of the killers and their victims. Beyond that, the book felt unfocused and unfinished.
In the end, Murderland raises an intriguing question but fails to provide convincing answers. True crime fans may appreciate the killer profiles, but readers looking for a well-supported exploration of the pollution-violence connection will likely walk away disappointed.
challenging
dark
informative
reflective
sad
fast-paced
challenging
dark
informative
slow-paced
dark
medium-paced
dark
informative
mysterious
reflective
fast-paced
challenging
dark
medium-paced