Scan barcode
charmedonex's review
3.0
3.5 stars. It was very entertaining (dual timelines as per the norm over the last few years). The last 20% was a bit of a bore but overall, a good read.
missmac_'s review against another edition
emotional
informative
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
4.0
daybreak1012's review against another edition
2.0
I looked forward to picking up this book, but couldn't ever seem to fully engage. While I have enjoyed many television drama series focused on the British monarchy and aristocracy, I have never found myself excessively taken with it. It's interesting to me and the history is fascinating, but I've never been obsessed with it to the point of following every detail. This book might possibly have hooked me more if I were more consumed by it.
What I liked about Another Woman's Husband:
The peek into an earlier era - I do love to learn more about how things were in other times. Seeing how society operated and what the customs were fascinates me. The character of people doesn't ever seem to change that much, but what is deemed acceptable by societal standards has gone through many evolutions over time.
What I didn't care for:
The characters - I either didn't care about them or straight up didn't like them. Nearly every last one of them. (I did really like Eleanor and Ralph Hargreaves.) Some were too prone to being doormats, while others had zero moral compass at all.
A serial lack of respect for marriage - It touched nearly every character to some extent. And worse, it almost seemed a glorification of it.
The writing style just didn't seem to click for me - I can't put my finger on what exactly didn't work for me. I don't mind dual timelines, typically, but this one just read like to two separate book manuscripts fell on the floor together and found themselves printed as one. While there was an occasional fragment of detail that would appear in both storylines and there was some resolution uniting them toward the end, mostly they just told two different series of events.
This was my first venture into a book by Ms Paul, and while many seem to love her works, I don't feel inclined to delve into a second book. Perhaps her style just isn't meant for me, though I appear to be somewhat of a minority here.
What I liked about Another Woman's Husband:
The peek into an earlier era - I do love to learn more about how things were in other times. Seeing how society operated and what the customs were fascinates me. The character of people doesn't ever seem to change that much, but what is deemed acceptable by societal standards has gone through many evolutions over time.
What I didn't care for:
The characters - I either didn't care about them or straight up didn't like them. Nearly every last one of them. (I did really like Eleanor and Ralph Hargreaves.) Some were too prone to being doormats, while others had zero moral compass at all.
A serial lack of respect for marriage - It touched nearly every character to some extent. And worse, it almost seemed a glorification of it.
The writing style just didn't seem to click for me - I can't put my finger on what exactly didn't work for me. I don't mind dual timelines, typically, but this one just read like to two separate book manuscripts fell on the floor together and found themselves printed as one. While there was an occasional fragment of detail that would appear in both storylines and there was some resolution uniting them toward the end, mostly they just told two different series of events.
This was my first venture into a book by Ms Paul, and while many seem to love her works, I don't feel inclined to delve into a second book. Perhaps her style just isn't meant for me, though I appear to be somewhat of a minority here.
diannel_04's review
5.0
Gill Paul has become one of my favourite writer's. In this book for the historical sections she takes the story of Wallis' Simpson's lifelong friendship with Mary Kirk and weaves a wonderful tale. The modern part of the story centers around Rachel and Alex who happen to be in a taxi that comes upon the scene of Princess Diana's car crash. Alexis a documentary filmmaker who gets slightly obsessed but it all works out.
I have read three of Ms. Paul's books and loved every one of them. I started this one yesterday afternoon and it is now 3 am. I read 439 in one day. I don't think that has ever happened before but I just couldn't stop. I can't wait to read more.
I have read three of Ms. Paul's books and loved every one of them. I started this one yesterday afternoon and it is now 3 am. I read 439 in one day. I don't think that has ever happened before but I just couldn't stop. I can't wait to read more.
sharondblk's review
2.0
I stayed up late last night, because it was either power through to the finish or just give up. There was not a lot I liked about this book – it had two time lines, one which moved through 30 years, and one which covered three months, which gave the book an odd rhythm.
The author made up things and overlaid them over history, which is a technique that had been used by many authors, but in this case it just felt false. Mainly thought, I started noticing odd things the author wrote, and then I couldn’t stop. Things like:
"Wallis was wearing a blue wool suit with chalk stripes and a matching trilby. It could have been a man's office wear but for the tiny waist, the padded shoulders, the long slim skirt and the jaunty angle of the hat."
So, it was not at all like a man's suit at all really.
And when Rachel is cooking a stew it lists all the ingredients, and states that she will put the beans in later. Why? What does this bizarre detail add to the book? At one point Rachel one of the main characters is tipsy after a couple of drinks because, the book says, she’s not much of a drinker. And yet she’s drinking in every second scene, including ordering a jug of mojitos, complaining that her partner doesn’t top up her vodka tonic while she is cooking dinner, and a bottle of champagne on a flight from Paris – its a one hour flight.
The main issue was that I didn’t like any of the characters – seriously, if you sleep with another woman’s husband, I don’t think how she treats him has anything to do with it – you are not blameless. And the main couple in the modern day timeline are just nasty to each other. So, generally a frustrating book, because it is almost a good read, but the unlikability of all the characters, and the lack of internal consistency, and the ending, made it less than satisfactory. Even the things that are taken directly from real life feel fake. Maybe it was the author trying to tie the fiction and facts together that doesn’t work well?
It did make me interested in that bit of history, and I read a Wikipedia article about Wallis Simpson, so that's a positive thing.
I was given a free ARC from NetGalley and this is my (obviously) honest review.
The author made up things and overlaid them over history, which is a technique that had been used by many authors, but in this case it just felt false. Mainly thought, I started noticing odd things the author wrote, and then I couldn’t stop. Things like:
"Wallis was wearing a blue wool suit with chalk stripes and a matching trilby. It could have been a man's office wear but for the tiny waist, the padded shoulders, the long slim skirt and the jaunty angle of the hat."
So, it was not at all like a man's suit at all really.
And when Rachel is cooking a stew it lists all the ingredients, and states that she will put the beans in later. Why? What does this bizarre detail add to the book? At one point Rachel one of the main characters is tipsy after a couple of drinks because, the book says, she’s not much of a drinker. And yet she’s drinking in every second scene, including ordering a jug of mojitos, complaining that her partner doesn’t top up her vodka tonic while she is cooking dinner, and a bottle of champagne on a flight from Paris – its a one hour flight.
The main issue was that I didn’t like any of the characters – seriously, if you sleep with another woman’s husband, I don’t think how she treats him has anything to do with it – you are not blameless. And the main couple in the modern day timeline are just nasty to each other. So, generally a frustrating book, because it is almost a good read, but the unlikability of all the characters, and the lack of internal consistency, and the ending, made it less than satisfactory. Even the things that are taken directly from real life feel fake. Maybe it was the author trying to tie the fiction and facts together that doesn’t work well?
It did make me interested in that bit of history, and I read a Wikipedia article about Wallis Simpson, so that's a positive thing.
I was given a free ARC from NetGalley and this is my (obviously) honest review.
snazzybooks's review
4.0
Book reviews on www.snazzybooks.com
I didn't read up much about this novel before I started it, and I'm so glad I didn't. It really surprised me - both in the plot (I'd forgotten that one of the narratives is set just after Diana's death in 1997, but find the entire subject so interesting) and the way certain parts seemed unconnected but then came together in unexpected ways.
I loved reading both timeframes; the 1997 narrative is something I can very vaguely remember happening - I was only 7 at the time, but remember where I was at the time as I remember my grandparents and parents being so shocked. It was so interesting to read about - both the parts that were fact, and those that the author fabricated to great effect (And still, despite some exaggeration in some aspects - which the author explains at the end - it's still completely believable!). I also really enjoyed reading the 1911 timeframe, as that's a fascinating era to me and always so shocking as it reinforces how different life was back then, especially for women.
The main female characters in Another Woman's Husband are interesting and likeable, though some of the people around them are definitely not nice people! I felt that Gill Paul did a great job of evoking a real sense of time and place in both storylines. Although it's not a jam-packed, action-adventure storyline, I still found it gripping; it's a very well-written, intriguing novel which I'd definitely recommend!
Many thanks to Headline Review and Netgalley for providing a copy of this novel on which I chose to write an honest and unbiased review.
I didn't read up much about this novel before I started it, and I'm so glad I didn't. It really surprised me - both in the plot (I'd forgotten that one of the narratives is set just after Diana's death in 1997, but find the entire subject so interesting) and the way certain parts seemed unconnected but then came together in unexpected ways.
I loved reading both timeframes; the 1997 narrative is something I can very vaguely remember happening - I was only 7 at the time, but remember where I was at the time as I remember my grandparents and parents being so shocked. It was so interesting to read about - both the parts that were fact, and those that the author fabricated to great effect (And still, despite some exaggeration in some aspects - which the author explains at the end - it's still completely believable!). I also really enjoyed reading the 1911 timeframe, as that's a fascinating era to me and always so shocking as it reinforces how different life was back then, especially for women.
The main female characters in Another Woman's Husband are interesting and likeable, though some of the people around them are definitely not nice people! I felt that Gill Paul did a great job of evoking a real sense of time and place in both storylines. Although it's not a jam-packed, action-adventure storyline, I still found it gripping; it's a very well-written, intriguing novel which I'd definitely recommend!
Many thanks to Headline Review and Netgalley for providing a copy of this novel on which I chose to write an honest and unbiased review.
alliecat's review
3.0
Torn between 3 & 4 stars. The 1920s-1940s storyline of the book is totally intriguing, and the 1997 storyline is interesting, but the latter feels almost unnecessary, and gets a bit annoying.
msoblong's review against another edition
4.0
**I received a free digital copy via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review**
I was very young when Diana died so I had only very basic knowledge of her. I knew a little more of Wallis Simpson but still not much. The idea of the book really intrigued me once I started, I was absolutely hooked on this from the start. The dual timeline was executed perfectly. While of course this is a fictionalization, it left me wanting to learn more. I’ve done some light internet reading on these two women and am looking forward to checking out some of the reference materials the author mentions.
I was very young when Diana died so I had only very basic knowledge of her. I knew a little more of Wallis Simpson but still not much. The idea of the book really intrigued me once I started, I was absolutely hooked on this from the start. The dual timeline was executed perfectly. While of course this is a fictionalization, it left me wanting to learn more. I’ve done some light internet reading on these two women and am looking forward to checking out some of the reference materials the author mentions.
mishale1's review
4.0
I loved this. I find the royal family interesting, I love historical fiction and have always found Wallis Simpson interesting.
This book is about Rachel, Mary Kirk and Wallis Simpson more than anything. Ironically the Princess Diana story isn’t a huge part of the story. No harm there.
Rachel gets engaged to her film maker boyfriend, it’s 1997 and they are behind Princess Diana after she gets into her infamous fatal accident.
Rachel’s fiancé finds a piece of jewelry on the scene and gives it to her for safe keeping.
Soon afterwards, he decides to make a film about Princess Diana’s death.
He becomes completely obsessed with conspiracy theories and starts to neglect Rachel.
They don’t know much, they do know that she was coming from the former home of Wallis Simpson.
The other timeline in the story begins in 1911 when Wallis Warfield and Mary Kirk meet as teenagers. They begin an immediate friendship. Mary was the closest friend Wallis every had and their friendship went on for many years. Wallis married first and moved away. This was the first fracture in their friendship. But their relationship persisted. Soon after, Mary got married too. They went from a childhood friendship to adult friends, dealing with the dramas their lives brought. Sometimes Mary could be jealous of Wallis and her unique personality. Wallis could charm anyone. If Wallis wanted something, she would make absolutely sure that she got it.
When husband #1 turned out to be a loss, Wallis decided husband #2 would be Ernest Simpson. The problem? Ernest was already married to Mary’s friend. But Wallis still got what she wanted.
This put another fracture in her relationship with Mary for several reasons.
And when Wallis had her chance to charm the future king of England, well, she was up to the challenge.
With no real knowledge of the situation, I used to just see Wallis and the King’s relationship as romantic. A kind abdicating the throne to marry his true love? What could be more romantic than that? But as I’ve learned more about the story (divorced? Not exactly. Nazi sympathizers? What?!) it has felt less so.
That said, it’s still incredibly interesting!
It makes for a great book, whether told as historical fiction or true.
I enjoyed the way this book was written. I was even interested in all the afterwards and historical notes. The author made it all feel so real that you didn’t know which parts were fact or fiction.
This book is about Rachel, Mary Kirk and Wallis Simpson more than anything. Ironically the Princess Diana story isn’t a huge part of the story. No harm there.
Rachel gets engaged to her film maker boyfriend, it’s 1997 and they are behind Princess Diana after she gets into her infamous fatal accident.
Rachel’s fiancé finds a piece of jewelry on the scene and gives it to her for safe keeping.
Soon afterwards, he decides to make a film about Princess Diana’s death.
He becomes completely obsessed with conspiracy theories and starts to neglect Rachel.
They don’t know much, they do know that she was coming from the former home of Wallis Simpson.
The other timeline in the story begins in 1911 when Wallis Warfield and Mary Kirk meet as teenagers. They begin an immediate friendship. Mary was the closest friend Wallis every had and their friendship went on for many years. Wallis married first and moved away. This was the first fracture in their friendship. But their relationship persisted. Soon after, Mary got married too. They went from a childhood friendship to adult friends, dealing with the dramas their lives brought. Sometimes Mary could be jealous of Wallis and her unique personality. Wallis could charm anyone. If Wallis wanted something, she would make absolutely sure that she got it.
When husband #1 turned out to be a loss, Wallis decided husband #2 would be Ernest Simpson. The problem? Ernest was already married to Mary’s friend. But Wallis still got what she wanted.
This put another fracture in her relationship with Mary for several reasons.
And when Wallis had her chance to charm the future king of England, well, she was up to the challenge.
With no real knowledge of the situation, I used to just see Wallis and the King’s relationship as romantic. A kind abdicating the throne to marry his true love? What could be more romantic than that? But as I’ve learned more about the story (divorced? Not exactly. Nazi sympathizers? What?!) it has felt less so.
That said, it’s still incredibly interesting!
It makes for a great book, whether told as historical fiction or true.
I enjoyed the way this book was written. I was even interested in all the afterwards and historical notes. The author made it all feel so real that you didn’t know which parts were fact or fiction.
disruptivepj's review
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75